Does Ruth Bader Ginsburg Support Eugenics?

Reader Comments
Back to blog

Of course she supports eugenics. This was the goal, of mainly liberal elites but not exclusively liberal, from the beginning, to destroy the lives of all blacks, jews and poor whites. She's only telling what she actually thinks and not surprisingly the state run media is silent because it is their goal as well. There's not enough blood that can be drained from these babies that will satisfy their thirst.

Michael Finley of VA 2:58PM March 03, 2010

As all may know, Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger Harris in 1916, who believed stongly in eugenics. Contreception in her day meant ABORTION. Her interests were to rid society of the "unwanted". Hitler, used as a blueprint for his exterminations of the disabled, "inferior races", marginalized, etc. that were promoted by eugenics and it's followers. Now it is time to ask yourself, who is to decide who will be the next "inferior race", marginalized, disabled, or to quote Ms. Ginzberg "those we do not want too many of"
Per Planned Parenthood’s own records fiscal year records of 2007-2008 they have preformed over 305,310 Abortions and they DO NOT handle Adoptions but instead refer
patients to centers that do handle adoptions. How many did they refer to adoption agencies? Only 4,912. They do not list any adoption agencies on their website.
Our government health care plan is not including any monies to be expended on adoptions. Why? I thought we were talking about choice. Or are we talking about
“those we do not want too many of”?

Helen of CA 7:22PM December 28, 2009

Ruth Baden Gingsburg: I've heard sometime ago that you had cancer and have had a few set backs but you always pull thru...and thats what really galls me. You rank as one of the worst, if not the worst judge, we ever had on the supreeme court and i always wish for the worst whenever i hear that you going back to the hospital...I'm sure you know your really no good, and you really know there never was a judge as terrible eas you, and yet you strugle to remain....Why??? Please do the United States a great favor...Quit the Supreeme Court..or at least die so we don't have to listen to your stupidity..We need judges that judge by the constitution...Not judges that make laws at the bench,,Like yourself...I should be ashamed but i'll tell you why i'm not..I'm an American that loves this country and i really hate people like you that hates this country and its constitution..You know that as well as me...

Dan of NY 11:17PM October 15, 2009

At her age and the effects of the possible on set of alzheimer's...she was releasing information held by a select few.
Fear and hate, no nation is safe from fascism.
Why aim to remove an entire race such as the black race?
Those that take evolution to the extreme and see it as their obligation to mankind to exterminate an entire race of people...even with a holocaust museum in our nations capitol, and yet abortion and sterilization is the norm?
How ironic that she is a supreme court justice...and unable to judge others by the content of their character but only by the color of their skin. ( Pray for deliverance )

E Daly of MD 9:35PM September 26, 2009

Abortion is used in this country to keep minorities in the minority. Sanger was a racist. Planned Parenthood and the 1973 Supreme Court Justices who voted to allow abortion are guilty of more murders than Hitler, Stalin, Mao, & Saddam put together.

Rio of CA 1:15AM July 18, 2009

As a reporter, you ought to research the full quote. Here is the rest of it:
"...Which some people felt would risk coercing women into having abortions when they didn’t really want them. But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way. And then I realized that my perception of it had been altogether wrong."
So actually, Justice Ginsburg was just explaining that her initial fears about Roe v. Wade were unfounded. The excerpt is misleading.

Lance Menthe of CA 2:14PM July 17, 2009

I don’t know how anyone can say she is talking about other’s opinions or opinions of the time Roe was instated because she says “…there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that WE DON’T WANT to have too many of.
If she had been expressing the opinion of the times, she would have stated “…there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that THEY DIDN’T want to have too many of.
Liberal fascists always slip up at some point and reveal their true intent. When they realize what they have done, they try to back peddle by stating their words are out of context or misunderstood. We all know the truth, and so does anyone who heard it or read what she said. Add to this the notion that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, is on record as being an advocate of eugenics particularly as they apply to blacks, I think Ginsburg’s comments are all too clear.

Melissa of IN 12:36PM July 17, 2009

I don’t know how anyone can say she is talking about other’s opinions or opinions of the time Roe was instated because she says “…there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that WE DON’T WANT to have too many of.
If she had been expressing the opinion of the times, she would have stated “…there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that THEY DIDN’T WANT to have too many of.
Liberal fascists always slip up at some point and reveal their true intent. When they realize what they have done, they try to back peddle by stating their words are out of context or misunderstood. We all know the truth, and so does anyone who heard it or read what she said. Add to this the notion that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, is on record as being an advocate of eugenics particularly as they apply to Blacks, I think Ginsburg’s comments are all too clear.

Melissa of TX 12:34PM July 17, 2009

Looking at history, I think it is a fact that evil people run the world and probably always will unless good people do something. It doesn't matter what they call themselves-liberal, Democrat, Republican, conservative, fascist, capitalist, communist, socialist, environmentalist, or whatever. They are in power because they lust after it and/or are brainwashed “useful idiots” and most importantly, the existing powerful, rich people want them there. They tell us what we want to hear and make excuses for previous "mistakes" and give people "good" reasons for laws they want passed, etc. but they are just manipulations used for control. Of course, there is the rare exception but the rest of them directly or indirectly (via ignorance) represent the true power and greed that runs the world.
They have claimed for decades that abortion was about women’s rights and if you said anything different then you were anti-woman or a religious freak or both but really all it was about was eugenics and population control-people sacrificing their first born to the king-our system. There are thousands of examples of the population control religion from billionaires talking about it and meeting about it (“Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation”-Times of London) to John Holdren, Obama’s science advisor, who wrote “It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions” on p.786 of his book "Ecoscience" to George HW Bush’s Family Planning Act and the sterilization of Native American women according to former US Senator Abourezk to many other examples. Sorry, all were honest mistakes. Now, what do you think is the true aim of all the corporate-sponsored climate change propaganda? Perhaps, it is a way to get people to accept there are too many of us so we need to reduce the world’s population because we are killing the earth so it's for our own good. How about them apples? Or, them “Green” apples?
Also, could this have something to do with government provided and controlled healthcare? I predict that shortly after it is implemented that it will become clear that there are not enough resources to provide for everybody, but of course, this will not include the rich, etc. so what is the difference between this and the one we have today? It actually could be worse because it may become illegal to provide healthcare to certain individuals. Negative eugenics done positively, that is, we care so much about everybody but we just can't provide for everybody and we're sorry but at least it will be good for the environment. Also, if they cared so much about human rights and life, why is the US always bombing one country or another whether or not a Democrat or Republican is in office? And you think they care about you and poor people and want to provide healthcare for everybody? I know they will definitely universally provide a few medical treatments-abortions, sterilizations, and euthanizations. Good luck to all of us, we are going to need it.

Ray B. of WI 12:46AM July 16, 2009

It is clear what she is saying to me and it speaks volumes. It is also clear that if people truelly read up on who and what the PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDERS were about they would see the same thing. They too believed in Eugenics and followed it...PROGRESSIVE AGENGA!!! I pray that our country moves into another direction but with all these new directions that Obama has forced us into I wonder what my kids have to look forward to. between Cap and trade the new healthcare bills all I can do is pray. And bringing the topic back to the point Jusstice Ginsberg Clearly was saying something only if people knew that California passed law before Nazi Germany did in WW2 in I think it was 1903 or 08 involving the eugenics movements.... again the progressive movement. Luckily we just didnt have Hitler as our dictator. LOOK IT UP!!!!

Mary G of MO 5:42PM July 15, 2009