Does Ruth Bader Ginsburg Support Eugenics?

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

A curious comment that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made in a weekend interview with the New York Times Magazine is getting lots of attention in the conservative blogosphere, casting a light on abortion jurisprudence just as nominee Sonia Sotomayor begins taking questions in the Senate.

I wouldn't be surprised if Ginsburg's quote was invoked by a Republican senator or a conservative witness during Sotomayor's hearing.

Ginsburg was responding to a question about access to abortion and a 1980 Supreme Court decision that upheld the Hyde Amendment, which bars Medicaid for funding abortion:

Q: Are you talking about the distances women have to travel because in parts of the country, abortion is essentially unavailable, because there are so few doctors and clinics that do the procedure? And also, the lack of Medicaid for abortions for poor women?

JUSTICE GINSBURG: Yes, the ruling about that surprised me. [Harris v. McRae—in 1980 the court upheld the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of Medicaid for abortions.] Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion....

Conservatives have pounced on the lines as evidence that Ginsburg supports eugenics, or selective human breeding. "Who might those populations be, Justice Ginsburg?" asked the Family Research Council in its daily E-mail to supporters last night. "The poor? Minorities? Persons with disabilities? Residents of Appalachia?"

There's been much less chatter about this on liberal blogs, but Media Matters argues that Ginsburg was speaking about public opinion about Roe and abortion, not about her own opinion.

And yet Ginsburg shares the position that she says follows from a belief in abortion-as-population control: that Medicaid ought to fund abortions for poor women.

Still, Ginsburg isn't 100 percent clear that she's personally sympathetic to the view that abortion should be used to control the growth of certain populations.

How do you interpret Ginsburg's remarks?

• Follow Dan Gilgoff on Twitter.
• Read more about abortion.

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts

Comment Name State Select One AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY International Email

Please enter the two words below into the text field underneath the image.

Incorrect please try again

Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear:

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.