Mitt Romney: Jihadism Is Not Part of Islam

June 3, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (34)

Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

With Obama's big speech to the Muslim world in the offing, I asked Mitt Romney in an interview yesterday about a major speech on national security that he gave on Monday at the Heritage Foundation (see above video). In it, Romney referred to Islam only insofar as he referred to "jihadism," a term he used four times in the address, and to "mullahs" and "ayatollahs."

I asked Romney how he'd respond to Muslim complaints that his speech characterized Islam in entirely sinister terms. His response surprised me:

I didn't refer to Islam at all, or to any other religion for that matter. I spoke about three major threats America faces on a long term basis. Jihadism is one of them, and that is not Islam. If you want my views on Islam, it's quite straightforward. Islam is one of the world's great religions and the great majority of people in Islam want peace for themselves and peace with their maker. They want to raise families and have a bright future.

There is, however, a movement in the world known as jihadism. They call themselves jihadists and I use the same term. And this jihadist movement is intent on causing the collapse of moderate Muslim states and the assassination of moderate Muslim leaders. It is also intent on causing collapse of other nations in the world. It's by no means a branch of Islam. It is instead an entirely different entity. In no way do I suggest it is a part of Islam.

Romney sees no connection whatsoever between Islam and the jihadists? Experts often say that Islamic terrorists are promoting a distorted version of Islam, but they seldom claim that there's no connection between the religious tradition and the jihadists who claim to act in that tradition's name.

The Heritage Foundation itself has issued papers and sponsored events on "radical Islam," "revolutionary Islam," and "militant Islam." Would Romney argue that none of these phenomena are related to Islam but rather constitute an entirely distinct phenomenon called jihadism?

Tags:
Islam,
religion,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (34)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Linked:

DhiMITTude

http://zillablog.marezilla.com/2011/12/dhimittude.html

and he has doubled down on it, now adding that islam is not violent.

Zilla of NY 5:33PM December 11, 2011

I don't think any politician understands or will admit to himself or the public that Islam is at war with the west. Meaning us and any non believer no matter where they are. Islam is going to be the death of all of us if something is not done to stop them.

Larry of FL 6:39AM November 30, 2011

Uggghhh! Romney has it sooo wrong. Jihad is a major tenant of Islam - both spiritual jihad AND violent jihad when Muslims believe it expedient.

Jihad is not associated with any other religion/ideology EXCEPT Islam.

We need a candidate who understands Islam, one who is confident enough about the truth of Islam that they will not be deceived by Islamic apologists who claim that Jihad is merely "spiritual". Taqiyya, pure and simple.

Learn, people!

Alan West and Herman Cain understand. Professional politicians will nicely avoid speaking the facts for fear of offending.

gfmucci of 5:08PM May 17, 2011

God & Country

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

advertisement