Poll: Most Mainline Clergy Oppose Gay Marriage

May 21, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

Mainline Protestantism is usually depicted in the news media as the politically liberal analogue to the conservative evangelical movement. But it's more complicated than that.

For instance, mainliners split their support evenly between George W. Bush and John Kerry in 2004, a year when nearly 80 percent of white evangelicals pulled the lever for Bush. Last November, Obama got only 44 percent of the white nonevangelical Protestant vote—mainliners, mostly—the same share Kerry got.

And USA Today's Cathy Lynn Grossman blogs about a new survey of mainline Protestant clergy, the most comprehensive ever conducted, that finds that most do not support legalizing same-sex marriage, even if they wouldn't be required to perform same-sex wedding ceremonies.

The survey finds that mainline Protestant clergy support gay rights generally—65 percent support legalized gay unions if you include civil unions—but gay marriage has become a key front for the gay rights movement in recent months as more and more states move to legalize it.

Public Religion Research, which conducted the survey, stresses that mainline clergy are trending left on gay rights:

Mainline clergy have become significantly more progressive on gay and lesbian issues over the last decade. Between 2001 and 2008, the number of clergy agreeing that gays and lesbians should have all the same rights and privileges as other American citizens increased 9 points from 70% to 79%. Nearly half (45%) of Mainline clergy report that their views on gay and lesbian issues are more liberal today than they were 10 years ago. About 4-in-10 say their views have not changed. Only 14% say their views are now more conservative than they were a decade earlier.

But it's striking that the nation's supposedly liberal mainline tradition is still so ambivalent on gay rights. For instance, less than half of mainline clergy support the ordination of gays and lesbians.

Here's how Public Religion Research breaks down the mainline clergy in terms of attitudes on gay rights:

A plurality of Mainline clergy constitute an Uncertain Middle, while close to one-third are strongly supportive of or opposed to LGBT rights and inclusion in the church.

  • Supportive Base (29%), clergy who strongly support gay and lesbian rights and generally do not see homosexuality as a choice nor as a sin;
  • Opposing Base (30%), clergy who strongly oppose gay and lesbian rights and generally see homosexuality as a choice and as a sin; and
  • The Uncertain Middle (41%), clergy who support some gay and lesbian rights but are ambivalent on others.
Tags:
religion,
gay rights

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I can't read wwwu.snews.com ni IE 4.1, just thought I might let oyu knows.

seo lace of AL 8:00PM May 02, 2010

+1

soundtracks of AL 6:07AM July 17, 2009

The definition of insanity is thinking you can disobey God and make him endorse it. Jesus clearly said that no unclean thing can enter heaven. The term "unclean" includes all those who practice immorality. Just as you can't do whatever you like in this country and expect that the law won't invoke punishment, neither can you break God's laws and think you are doing well. If someone steals from someone else, will the law say: "Go ahead. We'll change the law so it's legal to steal"? No, the law will not excuse malefactors. Neither will God endorse sin.

As for "Christian" homosexuals, it is not those who say, "Lord, Lord" who enter the kingdom of heaven, but those who do the Lord's will. (Matt. 7:21) You can't just say you follow Christ while walking the other direction and expect to end up in his location. Neither can you make a law saying your pathway is taking you the right direction, when you're clearly headed the wrong way. So, when people talk about "gays" having the "right" to marry, that is an oxymoron. Rights are God-given. We have the right to obey God or face the consequences. You can't legislate God out of existence.

Just as going the wrong way will make you end up in the wrong location unless you turn around, disobedience will certainly incur the wrath of God unless a sinner truly repents. I know it's not considered polite nowadays to mention the wrath of God, sin, or repentance. God's words are called "hate" speech so that people will never mention them. That's like calling the cure for cancer evil. Is the cure evil, or is it the cancer? Obviously the cancer is evil, and the cancer is sin. Let's cut it out before it overcomes the whole body. (Matt. 5:29, Matt. 18:9, Mark 9:47)

aes7878 of CA 5:34PM July 06, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.