Are Liberals Beginning to Win the Culture War?

April 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

ABC's Rick Klein has a nice piece up about all the recent culture war action that's been totally overshadowed in the national conversation by the hydra-headed recession. But I think his assertion that recent months have seen "victories for social liberals—and setbacks for social conservatives—on a scale not seen in decades" takes his thesis too far.

Here are the nut graphs of Klein's piece:

A flurry of state-level activity is dramatically expanding gay marriage in the United States. A court ruling in Iowa and a legislative vote in Vermont made them the third and fourth states to legalize same-sex marriage, and moves are under way for states including New York, Connecticut and New Hampshire to join them soon.

Add to that Obama administration executive orders on stem-cell research and abortion rights, and the last few months have brought victories for social liberals — and setbacks for social conservatives — on a scale not seen in decades.

A reality check is in order.

On abortion, besides the president's overturning the Mexico City policy—which prevented funds from going to family planning groups that endorse or provide abortion—what other victories can pro-abortion rights activists point to? Obama's Mexico City reversal simply turns the clock back to the Clinton policies.

What about the expectation that Obama will rescind so-called conscience protections for healthcare workers? That just turns the clock back to the Bush administration. Those protections, which proponents say shield abortion foes from having to endorse or help provide abortions or from having to participate in other controversial procedures, only took effect once Obama took office.

Regarding embryonic stem cell research, the National Institutes of Health under President Obama disappointed a lot of research proponents by limiting federal funds to excess embryos created by in vitro fertilization clinics. Many scientists and patient activists wanted federal money for therapeutic cloning or for creating embryos for the express purpose of research, but Obama's NIH has outlawed money for those purposes. For social liberals, this was only a partial victory. For social conservatives, it was only a partial defeat.

And while it is true that Vermont and Iowa have legalized same-sex marriage, the big headline from recent years is the number of states that have constitutionally barred gay couples from marrying—and, in most cases, from receiving any legal recognition for their unions. Twenty-nine states have taken such action. Four states, by comparison, have legalized gay marriage.

Sure, liberals have racked up a few recent victories in the culture war. But the tide ain't turning in a haven't-seen-this-in-decades kind of way.

Tags:
liberals,
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Just because your bible says something, doesn't make it fact! That book was written by man!

Not to mention, the bible and american law are not the same thing! THERE IS A THING CALLED SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE.

"How do we desern truth or conviction at all except we know what the Bible says is pleasing in the sight of God"

Very Simply, by looking at the world around you. It has no bearing on reality or the law of this country what is pleasing in the eyes of god. Atheists and Muslims and Jews and all religious denominations are equal in this country, YOUR GOD IS NOT THE ONLY GOD THAT PEOPLE HAVE BELIEF IN! How can you be so closeminded? So because you are a Christian, and a lot of you are out there, i should have to live MY life, by YOUR standards. NO. ITS CALLED FREEDOM OF RELIGION. WELCOME TO AMERICA.i cannot believe how close minded and lacking in intellect you Sheep are. Start using your brains, not just believing everything you're told.

THOMAS JEFFERSON WAS AN ATHEIST! GET OVER IT!

Tyler Stinson of CA 11:18AM May 26, 2009

It saddens me when folks stake some osrt of moral glorification to the effect that they "are not those sort of Christians" - the ones who becuase of their refusal to engage in the homosexualization of America are painted as "haters". This type of polarization is equally offensive as those who distort God's word. Why? For the same reason today that Jesus would tell all the PC folks to love the racist. Condemnation is the death by the law. Christians who "reflect" on the distate their homo hating Christians are hating the haters.

Where does it end?

We must love everyone. Not love without embracing the truth though. Homosexuality is perversion. Any sort of perversion must be cast out.

Any comment that seeks to disparage another group - even another group of haters is repulsive too. Jesus loved the convicts and murderers - or the potential that they had to fulfill God's will and plan for their lives.

Rob of GA 5:47PM May 17, 2009

Jake that is the best comment I've ever read

David of MA 5:48PM April 27, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.