A Divided Vote on Sebelius, but Little GOP Talk on Abortion Concerns

April 21, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

The Senate Finance Committee approved Kathleen Sebelius's nomination to be secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services today, but antiabortion forces seized on the split 15-to-8 committee vote to claim growing Republican opposition to Sebelius over her ties to late-term abortion provider George Tiller. Family Research Council President Tony Perkins just released this statement:

"The divided committee vote on Gov. Sebelius's nomination reflects growing grassroots opposition to Gov. Sebelius as questions continue to mount regarding her failure to disclose deep financial ties to late-term abortionist George Tiller. In the last few days, our supporters have sent nearly 40,000 emails to the Senate urging opposition to the Sebelius nomination . . . ."

But the Kansas City Star reports that the only outspoken opposition to Sebelius from a member of the Senate Finance Committee had nothing to do with abortion:

The only vocal objection came from Republican Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona who said he worried that Sebelius would be too quick to put limits on patient care. Kyl said Sebelius had a "insufficient commitment" to the right of Americans to choose their own doctor and health care plan.

This isn't the first instance of GOP sheepishness when it comes to confronting Sebelius on abortion. Republicans on the Finance Committee declined to ask Sebelius about her abortion position or her connection to Tiller during her confirmation hearing a few weeks ago.

With today's committee vote, it seems as if some GOP senators want to get credit for opposing Sebelius without taking a clear stand against her. Antiabortion forces may publicly be cheering the Republicans who opposed Sebelius today, but they're privately grinding their teeth over the silent treatment they're getting from their favored party.

Tags:
abortion,
Kathleen Sebelius,
religion,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Anyone who places such an insignificant value on human life and the dignity of life, is simply not trustworthy.

She will destroy any dignified life and death issues that we will all face at some time in our own lives. The government will decide who will recieve life saving medication, now that's a fact, are you confident that you will be in the receiving end or the other end?

JohnB of LA 5:01PM April 22, 2009

I second what thebob writes, and I would add: let other than white male Christians be thrown into the lake of fire (Revelation 20:14-15)! The vapidness of the twisted religous right reigns.

Rob of FL 8:16PM April 21, 2009

Doctors performing legal and necessary medical procedures should not be able to give campaign contributions?? Maybe we should just limit voting to white male Christians.

thebob.bob of KY 6:33PM April 21, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.