Why Were Evangelical Groups Silent About Tony Dungy?

April 9, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

Now that Tony Dungy has officially declined the Obama administration's invitation to join its faith advisory council, I'm wondering if the former NFL coach would have decided differently had evangelical groups supported him. A slew of gay rights and liberal groups blasted the invite to Dungy over his opposition to gay marriage, while the only conservative Christian group to defend it, as far as I can tell, is the Family Research Council.

Focus on the Family, whose Indiana affiliate presented Dungy with a 2007 award and was at the heart of the controversy surrounding the White House invitation, kept completely quiet.

The Indiana Focus affiliate, the Indiana Family Institute, was also mum.

So was the American Family Association. Ditto for the Southern Baptist Convention's public policy wing, the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission. Same at Gary Bauer's American Values.

Would those groups' outspoken support for Dungy have made a difference? It could have. The Obama administration had already issued the invitation, so the ball was in Dungy's court. He had lots of folks speaking out against his participation in the council and only one advocacy group in D.C. coming to his defense. He was totally outmanned.

At a moment when a string of states are legalizing gay marriage, wouldn't groups opposed to gay marriage want every ally they can get on Obama's apparently influential faith council? Now those groups will have to deal with a council that has become considerably more liberal in its second round of appointments.

Tags:
Obama administration,
evangelicals,
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I'm an Obama supporter [though from a right wing Goldwater youth].

I do not support gay marriage but likewise do not see it as nearly as important as about 100 more pressing problems! [and about 80 of them were caused or made worse by Bush/Cheney !]

I think a compromise could be a blank space on a civil union certificate, and people can fill in the words marriage if they want. They would do it, not the state.

Gays should have full rights. But "marriage" has been a term for a man and woman, and I completely understand more conservative people wanting that, in a sense merely a definition in the English language, to stay that way.

A close friend moved to Europe years ago so he could marry his partner. I don't feel that I should or are judging him in this time siding with conservatives. But it is terrible that the Fox Channel, etc., are trying to turn this into another divisive fight. We already are fighting THEIR unnecessary Iraq War, isn't that enough wasted energy?

Stephen of OH 3:32AM April 12, 2009

Bob obviously has never met and knows practically nothing about Tony Dungy, or he could never characterize him as he did. Tony is exactly opposite of they way Bob describes him in real life. David does to Patrick/Patty precisely what he accuses them of. His comments portray himself in his own words "hate filled intolerant...passing judgement." Asimus reveals, as do most non-evangelicals, an ignorance of what makes an evangelical. It has nothing to do with politics. In the evangelical camp are people of nearly every political stripe. Just because a person is an evangelical does not make him conservative, he may be very liberal and Asimus's conclusion may not be true. It may very well be that all of the Faith Based Advisory Council is "liberal."

Rex Miller of KS 1:24PM April 11, 2009

Please give Tony Dungy a little credit for how his Chirstian faith is guiding him in the midst of decision-making junctures.

Mr. Dungy is mature enough to pray & discern God's will for his life without the need for "polling" the public favorability of a decision.

Perhaps it's time for Mr. Gilgoff is break through the journalistic bubble & breathe some fresh air.

Not every decision needs to be so politically calculating.

There is such a thing as obeying God's personal calling for one's life.

Big Apple of NY 11:37PM April 10, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.