Was Bush the Most Faith-Based President in Modern Times?

March 19, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

A former Clinton White House official—who requests anonymity—E-mails a complaint about my calling George W. Bush "the most faith-based president in modern times":

You call George Bush the most faith-based president in modern times. Maybe it depends on one's definition of faith-based, but faith has been very important to both Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton throughout their lives, whereas Bush's faith came as an adult. When it comes to knowledge of the Bible, if that were used as the criteria of faith-based, I would put either of them up against many faith leaders. To me, Bush used faith politically more than Carter or Clinton. That, at least to me, is quite different from being faith-based, which seems to indicate a deeper personal faith.

Interesting point. I called Bush the most faith-based recent president because of the important role his faith played in his policies on abortion, gay marriage, faith-based initiatives, embryonic stem cell research—even Iraq and his 2004 re-election. Given that record, Bush appeared to rely on his faith in policy and politics more than Carter and Clinton did.

What do you think? Was the Sunday-school teacher Carter or the Bible-quoting Clinton more faith-based than Bush? Or maybe you think that another recent president was more faith-based than any of these guys?

Tags:
Obama administration,
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The personal lfe and dedication of President Carter places him #1 on religious Presidents of USA.

glynn of TX 5:33PM March 23, 2009

Jim of MN wrote: It is outside my ability to imagine anyone could consider Bush a religious person.

Many (not all) religious people are hypocrites.

Besides that, conservative Christianity is more than just "love your neighbor." It's also about a "loving God" who eternally torments those who fail to have what he alone can give them. (How's that for "loving your neighbor?") It's about a "loving God" who ordered men to slaughter thousands upon thousands of people, including women and children. It's about a "loving God" who sold his faithful follower (Job) down the river in order to win a bet with the Devil. It's about a "loving God" who tests a man's loyalty by asking him to kill his own son. It's about a "loving God" who--in a fit of rage--destroys the whole world in a flood, and then later says what he did was regrettable. If a religious person worships a God who does all of these things, then why should we surprised when they behave in a similar manner?

Darcy Grant of NY 9:21PM March 22, 2009

It is outside my ability to imagine anyone could consider Bush a religious person.

He talked the talk, but did not walk the walk

Jim of MN 1:45AM March 21, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.