The Politics Behind Obama's Embryonic Stem Cell Research Decision

March 9, 2009 RSS Feed Print

President Obama lifts restrictions on federally funded embryonic stem cell research today, providing a moment to mull over the politics of an issue that typically plays second fiddle to abortion and gay marriage in the nation's culture wars. I see four political forces shaping today's White House action and the fallout:

1. General support for federally funded embryonic stem cell research. There will be lots of discussion today about the controversy surrounding the issue, but only about a third of Americans strongly oppose embryonic stem cell research. A 2007 Pew poll found that 51 percent of Americans said it's more important to conduct stem cell research that might lead to new cures than to avoid destroying human embryos. An additional 14 percent said they were unsure, while just 35 percent said it's more important not to destroy human embryos.

Sure, this issue's controversial. But there's nowhere near the opposition to embryonic stem cell research as there is to abortion, where more than 60 percent of Americans favor more restrictions. Conservative evangelicals and Roman Catholics might not see a distinction between the two procedures, but lots of other Americans do.

2. As if the Republicans didn't have enough political problems already, embryonic stem cell research is another sticky wicket for the GOP. According to Pew, 60 percent of Democrats and 55 percent of independents back the research, while just 37 percent of Republicans do. That explains why support for embryonic stem cell research is such a no-brainer for the Democrats—it's the rare wedge issue in which the wedge breaks the Dems' way.

As on so many social issues, white evangelicals—the most reliably Republican voters in the country—are a lot farther to the right on stem cell research than the rest of the country. White evangelicals are the only major religious group in which a clear majority opposes embryonic stem cell research. The GOP is caught between its base and the moderate voters it needs if it's to start winning elections again.

3. Though they're unwavering in their opposition to embryonic stem cell research, conservative Christians know they face a stiff uphill climb in the court of public opinion, especially after culturally conservative Missouri voters amended their state Constitution to protect embryonic stem cell research in 2006. The Christian right hasn't been able to reverse public support for embryonic stem cell research, but it has made progress. A Pew poll shows that support for embryonic stem cell research is eroding somewhat, from 57 percent in 2005 to 51 percent in 2007.

Which is why the White House domestic policy adviser is handing the issue with sensitivity, telling the New York Times: "We are committed to pursuing stem cell research quite responsibly, but we recognize there are a range of beliefs on this."

4. Traditional antiabortion groups will use today's White House action as a teaching moment to push back on Obama's overtures toward conservative Christians. "[This] puts to rest any doubt: Barack Obama is [the] most pro-abortion president in our nation's history," says CatholicVote.org President Brian Burch. That's a harsh condemnation, but there will be harsher ones from conservative Christian groups today.

Tags:
Obama administration,
stem cells,
Barack Obama,
politics,
research

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

i think its really wrong what President Obama did. Its good that it saves a humans life but its also horrible to kill someone elses life.

Jennifer Gonzalez of TX 4:18PM December 07, 2010

If the other percentage of Americans knew exactly what embryonic stem cell "research" was and about the alternatives, then they would know how to vote with their brains and not their media-tuned ears. More emphasis is given by big-money celebrities (filling big activist shoes which require more an acting resume and money) on the carrot than the method. Why doesn't Obama take that pen of his and fund adult alternative stem cell resources and other research that works too? Not just "evangelicals" oppose embryonic stem cells being destroyed. Some of us can't be bought by Oprah or brainwashed by rich Hollywood. If the media were as objective as it claims to be, then more information would be put out there on all sources of stem cells, the progress being made there and ALL stem cell research and not just the sexy news-making kind.

Kristina of NC 7:23AM March 11, 2009

As it states in the Bible (Psalm 139:verses 13-16; Jeremiah 1:verses 4-5), we are known by our creator, the Lord God Almighty, the day that we are conceived. That means that a human life begins at the moment of conception, not at birth. It is a sin and against God's will to kill another human being. By lifting the ban, Obama is making it okay for scientists to destroy human embryos to harvest stem cells. No matter how you look at it, scientists now have a license to commit murder. How can our president, who swore on the very book that condemns murder, make it legal by lifting this ban.

All I can say is that President should take a look at Matthew 5:21, which states: "Ye have heard that it was said of them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment."

It's not my place, but God's, to judge. I simply point out what that what Obama is doing is wrong and that he will have to answer to God one day for his sins, the same way we all will have to answer on Judgment Day.

Daryl Hicks of GA 4:34PM March 10, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.