Brownback's Political Explanation for Supporting Kathleen Sebelius

March 6, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (9)

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

How to explain ardently antiabortion Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback's early support for Kathleen Sebelius, an ardent abortion rights supporter and a fellow Kansan, to head the Department of Health and Human Services? Kansas courtesy—and the fact that Barack Obama won in November and gets to appoint whom he wants. At least that's what the senator is saying publicly.

But two sources tell me that Brownback's people have been making the case to antiabortion groups—especially those in Kansas—that there's a strong political rationale for installing the Kansas governor in Washington. The move gets her out of Kansas, Brownback's argument goes, heading off her expected run for the Senate in 2010. Which means the Sunflower State Senate seat that Brownback's vacating for a gubernatorial run is likely to stay in Republican hands, since the Kansas Democratic Party doesn't have another candidate who is half as popular as Sebelius. And that's good for the antiabortion cause, according to the reasoning.

"It was much more important that the Senate seat remain red than it was that Brownback directly oppose Sebelius at HHS," says one person familiar with the situation who would only speak anonymously, "given that Obama is going to be driving the HHS agenda regardless of who's in charge."

A second source, Family Research Council Action lobbyist Tom McClusky, told me today that he's now heard Brownback's argument for backing Sebelius from a half-dozen Republican senators. But that doesn't mean antiabortion groups support the plan. "It's wrong on two counts," McClusky tells me. "They're putting politics before policy. And secondly, the Republicans are trying to predict an election two years out, which is impossible."

Tags:
HHS,
Kathleen Sebelius,
politics,
Sam Brownback,
Obama administration

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

nice, really nice!

Invexixheli of AL 11:13PM April 16, 2009

Brownback thinks he's got it all figured out. Under no circumstances should he have endorsed Sebellius, because in doing so,he endorses her radical anti-life tactics and those of Tiller and others like him. Brownback should have been the most vocal anti-Sebelius voice to be heard because he knows what she has done in his home state. Now, if elected, she can be thrust upon the whole nation along with her cronies, like Tiller, and along with her promotion of anti-life policies. Shame on Brownback. This is politics pure and simple...well, maybe not 'pure'...it's not too late for him to let his voice be heard. If he does not, then please do not vote him in as Governor. He should not be rewarded for playing Russian roulette with the lives of millions of babies in the wombs of their mothers...speak truth, Sam...speak for life before it's too late!!!! One of the first things Pope Benedict said when he was elected was that we tend to rationalize everything...do what is right and good and not what you think is a good political move...stand for life, not for your own political career....

Sam of CT 3:30PM March 12, 2009

If it is Obama's pick anyway (one of his rationales) how does supporting Sebelius help get her out of Kansas? I don't think Obama is too worried about offending pro-life folks at this point. Brownback's endorsement does hurt the cause on the otherhand.

Ed of MO 10:29PM March 10, 2009

God & Country

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

advertisement