Anti-Defamation League Knocks Obama's Faith-Based Initiatives

February 19, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

I'm surprised more liberal faith-based groups haven't spoken out against the Obama administration for postponing the decision over whether to permit faith-based hiring with federal funds administered through its new Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. It's likely a testament to the administration's outreach to critics of federally backed faith-based hiring. Many of those critics were invited to join the new White House Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.

The liberal groups that have dinged Obama for punting on the hiring question are the traditional church/state separation watch dogs: Americans United for Separation of Church and State and People for the American Way.

But in a letter to the White House yesterday, the Anti-Defamation League cited a list of concerns about church/state separation in the faith-based initiatives and took particular umbrage at Obama's delaying the hiring decision. Here's an excerpt:

We are concerned that your Executive Order fails to address critical constitutional safeguards for protecting religious organizations, beneficiaries, and the government.

Especially in the context of your vision of an expanded, better-funded faith-based initiative, we are deeply troubled by the prospect that taxpayer money will likely fund religious discrimination in employment decisions involving the people who deliver faith-based social services.

We believe that the proposed case-by-case review by the Justice Department is insufficient because this approach misses the opportunity for prophylactic guidance and Presidential leadership against employment discrimination by faith-based grant recipients. During the campaign, you stated that the Bush Administration faith-based initiative lacked essential safeguards against proselytizing and discrimination. Yet, the failure to establish new standards by which the Justice Department will judge whether an organization is entitled to an exemption to the religious nondiscrimination laws means that the old, inadequate safeguards remain the legal standards. 

My prediction: the more time elapses without resolution from the White House on faith-based hiring, the more of these complaints we'll see from prominent religious minority and progressive religious groups. I spoke today with White House Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships director Joshua DuBois, who says there's no timetable for resolving the issue.

Tags:
Obama administration,
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Under Bush conservative millionaire ministers like Pat Robertson had access to the taxpayers money. Now liberal millionaire ministers like Jesse Jackson will have access to taxpayers money. Is that change ?

Chuck Mann, North Carolina

Chuck Mann of NC 4:50PM February 26, 2009

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.