U.S. News Debate: Should Schools Teach Creationism?

February 6, 2009 RSS Feed Print

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

Charles Darwin turns 200 next week. Or he would have if, well, you know . . . .

To mark his birthday, U.S. News's opinion section has posted an intriguing debate over whether public schools ought to be in the creationism-teaching business.

Here's a taste, from the pro side:

During this last campaign, the topic of science—specifically, creationism and evolution—was pushed out onto the stage of the presidential debates. So much so that USA Today/Gallup released the results of a poll in which 66 percent of Americans stated that they believe in creationism. Not some hybrid theory mixing creationism and evolution. Not intelligent design. But specifically that "God created human beings pretty much in their present form at one time within the last 10,000 years." Which is pretty much how the book of Genesis explains creation.

The debate is generating loads of comments. Check it out, and add yours.

Tags:
evolution,
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (46)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

There's a monumental difference between how math is taught and how art is taught. Math is generally taught as objective fact, whereas art is generally taught as subjective. In other words, math is meant to be absolute and irrefutable whereas art is open to interpretation. In art classes, students are (hopefully) taught to consider all perspectives - and perhaps more importantly, they're taught (again, hopefully) that no one perspective is necessarily the "right" or "wrong" way of looking at art.

So if we can teach art this way - and students can fully understand the value of subjectivity and acknowledging multiple perspectives - then why can't religion be taught this way? You can tell someone what creationism is without trying to make them believe in it. Unfortunately, when people hear the phrase "teaching creationism" they immediately assume that such a teacher must also advocate creationism.

This is not necessarily true in all cases. Believing in some "god" does not prevent one from being able to explain to a friend what atheism is. Likewise, an atheist can explain what creationism is to an agnostic. That agnostic can relate the same information to others.

There is no natural law or doctrine which forces humans to teach in a forceful, persuasive manner. I don't see why creationism can't be taught in public schools - at least in higher grade levels - so long as teachers are responsible enough to remain as objective as possible. The same goes for atheism, agnosticism, etc.

When I was first told what abortion was, I wasn't told that it was wrong OR right. I was told what it was - that's it. Interestingly, it was a teacher who informed me about abortion - and that teacher never once swayed me one way or the other. To this day, I still retain an open perspective on the topic.

There are various reasons for and against teaching creationism in school - I don't really want to comment either way. My goal here was to debunk the apparently wide-spread myth that it's impossible to teach objectively.

Dan Rhoades of PA 6:30PM April 07, 2011

I just graduated highschool, and if I took a biology class that taught creationism I would walk out unless she somehow gave me scientific proof about creationism.

"Intelligent Design" is a joke. Its the church trying to push the beliefs of creationism into schools, but instead of using the word "God" they replaced it with "higher being". Still no scientific proof with Intelligent design. Just because 50% of america's are monotheistic does not mean majority rules in this situation...

Bree of MI 10:36PM March 28, 2011

If we teach creationism in public schools, then which version of creationism do we teach? We can't possibly teach every sect of religion unless we sacrifice much more, and in the end do we accomplish anything. Stick to the facts and the information of studies that have been done. Evolution just has so much more proof than creationism. So if you don't like public schools teaching evolution, then home school them. There would a much bigger debate if we allowed creationism in schools. We don't need cultural conflicts. The 30 years war was essentially pointless at its origin, and yet there was so much violence. lets not have it repeated

Jordan Wilson of NC 11:06PM February 15, 2011

God & Country

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now!

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

Is increasing access to healthcare a moral or faith-based cause?

View Results

Follow Dan Gilgoff on: Facebook | Twitter | MySpace

Photo Gallery

Faith Photo of the Day

See what's going on in the faith world across the globe every day.

SPECIAL REPORTS

Secrets of Islam

A guide to the world's fastest growing religion.

Sacred Places

Explore the significance, history, and enduring power of places people consider most sacred.

Women of the Bible

The "daughters of Eve" play many roles in the Old and New Testaments.