On Roe v. Wade Anniversary, Democrats Emphasize 'Abortion Reduction'

January 23, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

By Dan Gilgoff, God & Country

On the 36th anniversary of the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision, which legalized abortion, the Obama administration released a statement that reaffirmed the president's commitment to abortion rights but that departed somewhat from the Democrats' traditionally strict pro-choice line by articulating a goal to "reduce the need for abortion." While recent Republican and Democratic presidents have used the Roe anniversary either to institute or rescind a ban on U.S. funds to family planning groups abroad that provide or promote abortion—with Republican presidents instituting it and Democrats rescinding—Obama declined to take any action on the ban, known as the Mexico City policy.

"Not signing that repeal during the March for Life—as he was previously thought to do—was an initial sign of respect," said a Democrat close to the White House, referring to the annual anti-Roe march organized by abortion opponents. "This is a signal that the new administration is going to take a different approach and tone from the old culture wars.

"Notice the emphasis on abortion reduction," the Democrat continued, referring to the president's statement on the Roe anniversary. "This is the first statement from the president on abortion, and it reflects the significant change we have all been advocating for."

Traditional pro-life groups are dismissing the Obama administration's moves as purely symbolic and rhetorical. "His policies, deferred today for a few hours, weeks, or—we hope—months, will certainly promote and increase the abortion rate," blogs the Family Research Council's Chuck Donovan.

Here's President Obama's statement on the Roe anniversary:

On the 36th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, we are reminded that this decision not only protects women's health and reproductive freedom, but stands for a broader principle: that government should not intrude on our most private family matters. I remain committed to protecting a woman's right to choose.

While this is a sensitive and often divisive issue, no matter what our views, we are united in our determination to prevent unintended pregnancies, reduce the need for abortion, and support women and families in the choices they make. To accomplish these goals, we must work to find common ground to expand access to affordable contraception, accurate health information, and preventative services.

On this anniversary, we must also recommit ourselves more broadly to ensuring that our daughters have the same rights and opportunities as our sons: the chance to attain a world-class education; to have fulfilling careers in any industry; to be treated fairly and paid equally for their work; and to have no limits on their dreams. That is what I want for women everywhere.

The president's vow to reduce demand for abortion has been adopted by other prominent Democratic officials. Check out these lines in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's statement marking the Roe anniversary:

"I will continue to work to preserve the right to privacy while promoting a comprehensive approach to reproductive health care, including planning for healthy families, reducing the number of abortions and unintended pregnancies, and providing full and medically-accurate sexuality education."

Now the question is whether the Democrats will actually pass legislation that advances their stated goal of reducing demand for abortion.

After Election Day, I was struck by how important the Democratic Party's so-called faith consultants thought it was that the party deliver on promises to enact abortion-reduction policies in order to maintain its credibility among culturally conservative voters who moved to the Democratic column last year. So far, the Democrats' shift on the abortion issue has been purely tonal.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Obama administration,
abortion,
religion

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It is amazing to me that no one is addressing this abortion issue properly. Any time a controversy lasts so intensely for many years, both sides are right in a major point. First, for the Pro-Lifers, we already have a law that states murder requires court action, i.e., doctors who are aborting babies need to be punished and licenses withdrawn. Stop trying to negate the reality that life is life inside the womb at any stage of growth. Therefore, stop all abortions today. For women in labor, doctors should have a legal form signed by those women and the doctor, before labor begins, agreeing that if a delivery crisis occurs, their baby should be spared if only one life can be saved. Mothers need to be encouraged by recalling the issue of self-sacrifice in order to protect their child, just like the real mother in the Biblical account when King Solomon had two women both demanding the same baby as their own. His proposal for a "solution" immediately identified the real mother who was willing to give her baby away rather than see its life destroyed. Mothers have lived their lives; let their babies have a chance at starting life.

Secondly, for Pro-Choice advocates, they are exactly right in understanding the bigger picture and long-range misuse, that if you overthrow a woman's right to decide medical issues, you open a Pandora's box of experimental medical tortures like the Nazi doctors did in prison camps during WWII when women were helpless to fight the "authorities." Pro-Lifers do not understand this need for protection for all women.

However, both sides need to get smart now and settle this issue. Millions of babies have been killed and all of you single people wonder why there are no decent mates to marry? Military leaders are wondering why they do not have enough troops to send everywhere in the nation and world? You have killed them over the past three decades. Stop destroying the power potential of our country, its youth. God will never return to fully blessing this nation as long as you keep destroying what HE has created. Think about it.

You already have heard or read the Bible verses that describe punishment for those who violate God's laws.

Dorothy Marie Kucera of NE 10:30AM February 05, 2009

Mr. Gilgoff,

We look forward to your column decrying the rengagement of the culture wars when President Obama revoked the Mexico City policy less than 3 hours after you posted this.

"On this anniversary, we must also recommit ourselves more broadly to ensuring that our daughters have the same rights and opportunities as our sons: the chance to attain a world-class education; to have fulfilling careers in any industry; to be treated fairly and paid equally for their work; and to have no limits on their dreams. That is what I want for women everywhere."

Everywhere, that is, except in the womb. Unborn girls need not apply.

Garcilaso Vega of DC 3:34PM January 30, 2009

Do a search on beliefnet com. There are several articles about it is really a pro-choice action because it will provide birth control for very very poor women.

Julie of CO 2:26AM January 25, 2009

God & Country

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

advertisement