Gay-Rights Leaders Warm to Obama, and Not Just Over Gene Robinson

January 12, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (11)

I've got a new story up at usnews.com about how happy the gay-rights movement is about President-elect Obama's invitation to gay Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson to deliver the invocation to kick off inauguration week, especially on the heels of the Rick Warren invitation.

What's remarkable is how bullish Human Rights Campaign, the biggest gay-rights group in the country, is on Obama now after going apoplectic over Warren a few weeks back. Some of that is a reflection on the symbolism of Robinson after Warren.

But it's more than that. It's a testament to how strenuously the Obama transition team has been reaching out to gay-rights leaders and how enthusiastically it has responded to those leaders' list of policy priorities. Here's part of my story that draws from an interview I did this morning with Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese:

Despite the fallout the Warren invitation engendered in the gay community, the Human Rights Campaign's Solmonese says the Obama transition team has been "very enthusiastic to the list of agenda items for the LGBT community."

That wish list includes executive orders for instituting nondiscrimination policies for federal employees on sexual orientation or gender identity grounds, for interpreting the Family and Medical Leave Act to include same-sex partners, and to enact a congressionally approved end to a ban on HIV-positive travelers from entering the U.S.

"Four years from now, will we believe that we have made more progress for advancing gay equality than at any other time in our history and than under any other president?" says Solmonese. "I think the answer is yes. That is what's paramount."

Solmonese is fairly gushing here. Very high hopes for Obama. Compare that to my conversation with Human Rights Campaign Vice President David Smith about a month ago:

Smith...said Obama's gay outreach to date has been a "mixed bag." He said HRC had been disappointed in how few openly gay appointments Obama had made so far. The only such appointment to a prominent White House post so far, according to Smith, is Nancy Sutley as chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality....

"The Obama team has sent a very uplifting message that positive change is coming for LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender] Americans, but we haven't seen it yet. There has been no concrete evidence of inclusion. That's the environment in which this Warren announcement happened—it exacerbates the level of disappointment that exists."

In four short weeks, HRC is singing a much different tune. And it ain't all 'cause of Gene Robinson. The transition team has clearly stepped up its LGBT outreach. Now let's see how many of those executive orders Obama delivers.

Tags:
LGBT rights,
religion,
Barack Obama,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

modeling engine 1950 prepared release group

mossbufor of DC 5:47AM November 17, 2009

+1

soundtracks of AL 5:35AM July 17, 2009

wright represents the kind of individual that has the world embroiled in hate, disrespect to fellow man, and wars. These individuals are unable to think for themselves to discern what is right and wrong and instead they wait for their priest, pastor, and religion to dictate their "moral compass". This lack of self analysis and thought is what allows hateful attitudes and practices in the name of religion.

History is filled with this behavior. It is what allowed for the slaughter of native americans in the name of Christianity. It justified slavery. It accepts gender discrimination in the name of catholicism. It results in terrorist attacks in the name of Islam. It promotes discrimination towards homosexuals in the name of the bible.

These blind followers never stopped to think for themselves, is slavery wrong despite it being justified by religion? Is the practice of gender inequality acceptable because the church says so? Is killing 3000 innocent people realy what Allah would want? Is hate and discrimination towards gays justified because "the bible says so"? Why? Why is homosexuality "immoral" when it happens naturally in thousands of species on Earth? Is it only a "choice" whent it is applied to humans? If God created the world didnt he create homosexuals as well? Didnt Jesus side with the marginalized and unprotected? Would God oppose love? How does homosexuality harm anyone? Use your BRAINS, thats why God gave you one! Think, ask, reason. Dont "accept" just because the "religion" says so". Such attitude has been the cause of much suffering and wrongdoing through history.

Jesus did not write the bible. The bible is a man made book (female input absent of course) that went through years of editing and selections of scriptures that some thought was what Christianity should be. Religious fanatisism is the antithesis of self reaso and it has caused and continues to cause suffering on humankind. The other day I saw a bumper stcker that I believe summarizes this issue quite well: "God, protect me from your followers."

neil of CA 7:55PM January 14, 2009

God & Country

Dan Gilgoff covers religion for U.S. News & World Report. He is the author of The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War, and is a former politics editor at beliefnet. E-mail Dan at godandcountry@usnews.com.

advertisement