• Comment (1)

McKeon Desperately Trying to Reverse Military Budget Cuts

March 15, 2012 RSS Feed Print

While congressional Republicans are scrambling for a way to avoid additional military budget cuts, a hawkish House Republican has gone even further by vowing to restore cuts that have already been set in motion.

The Pentagon has enacted a 10-year, $350 billion cut to planned spending. If Congress fails to pass a $1.2 trillion deficit-reduction package this year, it will face another $500 billion cut.

[Pictures: U.S. Displays Military Power in the Persian Gulf.]

House Armed Services Committee chairman Buck McKeon is doing everything he can to make sure that doesn't happen.

"We spend about half our base defense budget on personnel, investing in health care, education, living allowances for our troops," McKeon said Wednesday during a speech at the Ronald Reagan Foundation and Library in California. "China buys things that shoot. And they can buy far more of them for a dollar than we can. So we must do our utmost to reverse the defense cuts."

[U.S. News Debate Club: Are Cuts to the Defense Budget Necessary?]

McKeon wants more ships, more aircraft and more troops than President Obama's new national defense plan says are needed.

Claude Chafin, an Armed Services Committee spokesman, says McKeon's main focus is finding a way to avoid the $500 billion cut. But McKeon is serious about reversing the first round of cuts by increasing the Pentagon budget year-by-year, and has discussed that very notion with House leaders, Chafin says.

One defense analyst says McKeon's plan is a longshot.

Reversing the first round of cuts "would add $487 billion to the deficit over the next 10 years," says Todd Harrison of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.

"I don't think this is likely to happen because the Republicans in Congress insisted on these cuts in order to raise the debt ceiling," Harrison says. "That's what brought this all about in the first place."

Tags:
Department of Defense,
Buck McKeon,
federal budget,
foreign policy,
national security terrorism and the military,
military

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This guy is delusional. In an economy that needs so much, and wars in places where no one wishes we were there, it seems ridiculous to propose increase military spending.

I wonder which contractors or neo-cons have him in their back pockets.

The defense budget is THREE TIMES HIGHER than it was in the Clinton years. $5oo Billion (HALF A TRILLION) higher. Whatever happened to the GOTP party of balancing the budget? They were bought by the lobbyists and and pork-loving constituents of Congressional officials.

DeeToo of SC 5:14PM March 15, 2012

DOTMIL

Brought to you by veteran national security correspondent John T. Bennett and the U.S. News & World Report staff, DOTMIL takes you inside the offices of the Pentagon's E-Ring, behind the scenes with congressional policymakers and beyond the boardrooms of America's top defense companies to report, analyze, and interpret the evolving international security environment and how it impacts U.S. interests at home and abroad.

Latest Videos

advertisement

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.