• Comment (3)

Pentagon Chief Panetta: U.S. Will Do 'Everything' to Stop Iran

February 14, 2012 RSS Feed Print

As Iran and Israel traded barbs over a dual bombing plot—including suspected "magnet bomb" attacks against Israeli diplomats in New Delhi and Tbilisi— U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta warned Tehran Tuesday about its nuclear ambitions and support for terrorist organizations.

Panetta told lawmakers the Obama administration "will not tolerate" a nuclear-armed Iran, adding Washington must "do everything we can to prevent" Iran from fielding atomic weapons.

Rejecting the idea that the U.S. might allow Iran to acquire the bomb then follow up with a "containment" strategy, Panetta said the U.S. must "prevent" Tehran from building the bomb.

The defense chief tempered his forceful rhetoric by saying he supports the administration's sanctions-based effort that has worked through international entities to "pressure" Iran into scuttling its nuclear weapons ambitions.

But he sounded equally tough on Iran when he at several moments zeroed in on Tehran's alleged support of terrorist organizations.

[Gallery: Iran Conducts Wargames in Persian Gulf]

For instance, Sen. Ben Nelson, a Nebraska Democrat, pressed the secretary on whether Iran is providing significant support to terrorist groups or "just being pesky" with token assistance. Panetta responded sternly: "It's beyond pesky," telling Nelson that U.S. officials believe Iran is supplying terror outfits with weapons and other support.

A 2011 threat assessment prepared by the office of the Director of National Intelligence for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence concluded Iran is ramping up its "backing groups that oppose U.S. and Israeli interests."

Iran and Israel continued Tuesday to blame each other for a pair of suspected bombing attempts against Israeli diplomats in Georgia and India. Those targeted bombings came about a month after a blast killed a senior Iranian nuclear scientist. The flap has unnerved many regional experts who fear the bitter rivals are heading toward an armed conflict.

Sen. Roger Wicker, a Mississippi Republican, raised concerns about reports that Israel likely will strike Iranian nuclear and other targets this spring. Panetta said the Obama administration believes Israeli officials have yet to make such a decision.

Several reports from the region on Tuesday described a tense exchange near the Strait of Hormuz, where several small, fast Iranian vessels swept close to several American Navy ships. MSNBC reported a U.S. helicopter fired flares into the water, which compelled the Iranian ships to leave the area.

Tags:
Ben Nelson,
Leon Panetta,
Department of Defense,
Iran,
foreign policy,
national security terrorism and the military,
military

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

With all due respect to John and Alan...

I believe the term is "wielding, not fielding Atomic weapons."

It's not about how Obama has disarmed the U.S, you may have it all wrong, it's called fine tuning, do we really need numerours bases per state when 1 - 2 with response times from airborne assetts being seconds as opposed to the minutes it takes now to figure out who and which base should respond to which situation?

I hope you're not serious that a President would ever bow down to a psychotic country who would love nothing mroe than to see not only the Jews, but all whom they define as infidels, die.

If you look at the past few years of successful terrorist capture and kill rates, on Obama's watch Sadam is dead, Bin Laden was Double tapped, Khadaffi's dead, our troops are home from Iraq and soon to be home from Afghanistan....

I'd be willing to agree although Obama may not be willing to go to war, he'd indirectly support Israel's conecpt of taking out the reactors, pulverising Iran's annoying speedboats and sending a clear and present signal this President doesn't take sh-t from anybody and is willing to support countries direct or indirect whom want peace and democracy to prevail.

It's not a perfect world and the latter doesn't come easily, yet as we sit and focus on criticque, I didn't notice either of you offering an alternative solution.

Mine is simple - Jointly every free nation should bomb a nice hole where Iran once was & fill it with the worlds sh-t as a subutle reminder of the very thing which once occupied it.

Dark Angel of CA 4:27PM February 17, 2012

"Washington must "do everything we can to prevent" Iran from fielding atomic weapons."

This means that Obama will do "everything", starting with unilateral disarming of the U.S. followed by slashing our military and then apologizing to Iran for the "evils" of America.

That's just about "everything" leading up to U.S. total capitulation.

Jon Weiss of KY 6:09AM February 17, 2012

Sorry Leon, but I do not believe Obama would go to war over this issue. He hates the Jews and Israel and he isnt so thrilled about our country either. There is nothing in Obama's past statements or actions that would indicate he is willing to go to war over this.

alan of NY 4:00PM February 16, 2012

DOTMIL

Brought to you by veteran national security correspondent John T. Bennett and the U.S. News & World Report staff, DOTMIL takes you inside the offices of the Pentagon's E-Ring, behind the scenes with congressional policymakers and beyond the boardrooms of America's top defense companies to report, analyze, and interpret the evolving international security environment and how it impacts U.S. interests at home and abroad.

Latest Videos

advertisement

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.