• Comment (8)

Progressives Push Amendment to Overturn Citizens United

April 18, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Opponents of the Supreme Court ruling that led to unlimited corporate campaign spending acknowledged that their bid for a constitutional amendment to address the issue is a long shot, but hope to rally grassroots support for change as a consequence of the effort.

Led by progressive members of Congress, including Sens. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, and Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, a group of national and local activists held a press conference at the Capitol Visitors Center on Wednesday to push back against the controversial ruling known as Citizens United.

"At the very deepest sense, we are fighting to make sure that America does not become an oligarchy where people with unlimited sums of money control the political process and the economic process," Sanders said.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the secret service scandal.]

"We are fighting for grassroots democracy and we're going to win this fight because you're going to help us at the grassroots level, and most importantly because the people of the United States understand that by allowing big-money interests to spend unlimited amounts of money on campaigns is not what people fought and died for to maintain this great country and our democracy," he said.

Sanders said the 2010 Citizens United decision designating corporations as people and therefore entitled to First Amendment rights of free speech--with campaign spending considered speech--impacts all levels of policymaking in Congress.

"Working people are trying to keep their heads above water and here on Capitol Hill all kinds of money is flooding into this institution so the Congress spends day and night worrying about the wealthy and the powerful and forgetting about the middle class and working families," he said, adding that though that may have historically been the case, it's now worse than ever.

[Check out U.S. News Weekly: an insider's guide to politics and policy.]

The coalition of good government groups gathered Wednesday are asking members of Congress to sign a pledge stating their support for "amending the Constitution of the United States to restore the rights of the American people, undermined by Citizens United and related cases, to protect the integrity of our elections and limit the corrosive influence of money in our democratic process."

Similar pledges, such as one signed by nearly all Republican members of Congress stating they will not support tax increases, have proven effective at holding members accountable for their promises and had a real impact on legislation.

Typically, constitutional amendments are achieved by Congress passing the proposal by two thirds margins in both the House and Senate followed by three fourths of state legislatures also approving the measures.

[Read: Ted Nugent calls Obama administration 'criminals.']

But the road facing these activists is uphill because of the partisan implications of their mission as well as the onerous overall process. While several Democratic members have already sponsored varying constitutional amendments addressing the topic, there is disagreement on whether unions and nonprofits--also granted First Amendment rights in the Citizens United ruling--would be banned from unlimited campaign giving. Unions typically support Democratic candidates and causes versus for-profit corporations, which tend to favor Republicans.

And the impetus for change is partisan as well. Republicans have fared well under the new rules, taking better advantage of the new fundraising landscape, as highlighted by the success of the Karl Rove-headed Super PAC American Crossroads during the 2010 elections. Democrats, meanwhile, have struggled to similarly thrive and perceive the ruling as a campaigning disadvantage.

Email: rmetzler@usnews.com

Twitter: @rebekahmetzler

Tags:
campaigns,
elections,
2012 presidential election,
money

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

E. Evans - we have been asking the same question of "what can we do" ? Calling Congresspeople and signing petitions doesn't really seem to get the job done.

It seems like money is required to have a voice in Washington. Special interests have a loud voice thanks to their huge pot of money. Check out Politibuy.org - we will be launching a platform so ordinary Americans can also make our voice heard in Washington.

Politibuy.org of MI 6:14PM October 03, 2012

How about taking an easier path? Impeach Supreme Court justices Scalia and Thomas who made a secret trip to the Koch brothers Palm Springs mansion to help them plan their SC case, then returned to Washington to vote for the Kochs. Thomas has committed 9 counts of felony perjury as well, swearing under oath that his wife had no income for 9 years when she was a lobbyist who made almost $2 million working for a group with close ties to the Kochs. This case should be thrown out and re heard by a new Supreme Court with the corrupt cancer of the two crooks thrown out. They provided the tying and winning votes for the Kochs in this case, just as they did to SELECT "W" Bush as President, despite the fact that Gore was obviously going to win the recount in Florida. Citizens United is the biggest threat to representative democracy in the history of this country. Our government should not be for sale, as is currently the case. I have no problem with removing union funding from campaigns, as long as the same applies to wealthy individuals and corporations. We despirately need public campaign financing, with ALL the money taken out of politics. Candidates can compete on the publicly owned TV and radio airwaves and any marginal costs can be publicly financed, with things such as a voluntary check off of $3 per tax return, which the republicans removed. If you have to outspend opponents by 50 to 1, as Romney has in many states to win his nomination, your message must not be all that great. We need to enact lobby reform at the same time and make it a felony to lobby behind closed doors, through the mail, e mail, etc. C Span is the perfect forum for lobbying, but equal time needs to be allocated to opposing views, all in the light of day. With public financing, we won't have to worry about any more bribery which is destroying this country, like the $550,000.00 paid to Mitch McConnell by the Kochs, big oil, and the coal lobby just before he filibustered the energy bill which had 59 votes in the senate, and 85 percent support of Americans. We have paid TRILLIONS of dollars in higher energy costs already when we could have the choice of purchising natural gas fuel, which is selling for as low as $0.98 locally. Gas prices skyrocketed following McConnells filibuster, because the oil mafia knew they would have no competition. Gasoline is $0.11 per gallon in Caracas today. Why are we paying 35 times the price they pay?

mac gardner of OK 4:47PM June 11, 2012

If the Supreme Court has not yet realized the problems that have evolved over their decision to allow unlimited funding to the election without transparency - than they all need to go. What they have done is to legalized racketeering. The election of any office should be by the citizens of this country not by the corporations. There needs to be an reasonable cap of money put on the corporations or citizens of this country. Lets face it, with the amount of money that Romeny has received, - I see his pay backs - not in the best interest of the citizens of this country. This has just Ok'd the corruption in Washington that needs to go. I am having a hard time with their decision.

Joyce Reed of KY 4:29PM June 11, 2012

The Ballot 2012

Who's up, who's down, where are they stopping, and what are they saying? We're tracking the 2012 campaign so you don't have to.

advertisement

Photo Galleries

Storms, Wildfires Tear Across U.S.

Heavy rain, high winds and fire continue to plague regions throughout the country.

Latest Campaign Videos