• Comment (3)

Bill Maher Pledges $1 Million to Obama Super PAC

February 24, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Comedian Bill Maher announced Thursday that he is donating $1 million to "Priorities USA Action," a super PAC supporting Barack Obama. Maher announced his gift during a stand-up comedy special called "CrazyStupidPolitics," which was streamed live on Yahoo.

Maher, the host of HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher, is known for his liberal political and religious views. He publicly supported Obama's 2008 campaign.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Super PACs.]

"I would like tonight to announce a donation to the Obama super PAC, which has the very unfortunate tongue-twister name Priority [sic] USA Action," Maher said Thursday. "I know, it was named by Borat. But tonight, I would like to give that PAC $1 million."

In a statement released after the show, Maher explained that getting Obama elected again was "worth a million dollars," and he characterized his donation as "the wisest investment I think I could make."

Earlier this month, President Obama encouraged supporters to donate money to super PACs despite questions about their transparency and their role in negative advertising, particularly during the Republican presidential primary.

[U.S. News Debate Club: Are Super PACs Harming U.S. Politics?]

Priorities USA Action has been struggling to raise money, and super PACs supporting Republican challengers have had much more success. According to the Washington Post, Priorities USA Action raised only $59,000 in January.

Maher's donation joins others from DreamWorks CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg, who donated $2.1 million to the super PAC, and Steven Spielberg, who chipped in $100,000.

Tags:
2012 presidential election,
Obama administration,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

AmirDewani of FL:

What a beautifully written missive.

ann keenan of MI 10:36PM February 25, 2012

How does the comedian feel about Obama's use of federal resources to jackboot their way into California and Colorado and deny effective herbal medications to medical cannabis patients? Not too funny in my book. How does the rich comedy guy feel about the civilians and children killed by our drones and by our 5000 sorties over Libya and how does he feel about the riots against us in Afghanistan after so many civilian deaths there, or about all the other unconstitutional military actions taken by President Obama?

Mahar is a talented comedian, but his politics are confusing.

John of NY 3:00AM February 25, 2012

The politics here revolves around quality of the candidate and money. Neither of these two things would win elections singly.

Though an independent voter, I think, under the present circumstances, Mr. Obama will win because the quality candidate does not seem to be there to oppose him successfully.And whatever economic difficulties exist for the common citizens,these are partially due to the negative attitude of his opponents.

The only thing to repent is that countries like Australia, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Thailand, Brazil and many in the democratic world have been able to identify women chief executives from time to time.Why not America in centuries? While we claim to be the world champions to empowering women, this lack of wisdom pinches.

Another factor is the need for quality leadership which could help us maintain peace globally, create more friends, resolve differences via negotiations, not war, and help eradicate the evils of poverty throughout the world.And we need quality leadership to coordinate efforts in resolving our serious economic problems like mounting debts/deficits/unemployment and boosting our export earnings instead of cutting the retirement benefits etc. Presently, out of the two. Mr. Obama seems to be the next winner. They have been mudslinging against him and some of the narrow minded religious leaders are also knowingly or unknowingly indulging in such electioneering drama, but we Americans, can't be hood winked.

Once we elect a president, and once he takes the oath according to the constitution, he becomes the president of the whole country. If he wins a Nobel Prize, like Mr.Obama did, he should be honored by all of us.If he produces for us a good program like his health initiatives, employment efforts, poverty eradication, banking/financial/fiscal reforms all must support in public interest instead of doing party politics.

Last time I observed, the moment Mr.Obama (not my relative) took office, some of the media moguls, and those who were defeated, (not all) began challenging the birth status, religious standing and many negative aspects against an elected American president.This I think was much much against the American culture/values and respectability to the Head of the State and the Commander-in-Chief.Whosoever wins this time, let us make sure the defeated elements don't repeat such unhealthy practices. The world expects quality leadership from us. Let us set some golden standards according to the wishes and aspirations of our forefathers like George Washington.

AmirDewani of FL 5:38PM February 24, 2012

The Ballot 2012

Who's up, who's down, where are they stopping, and what are they saying? We're tracking the 2012 campaign so you don't have to.

advertisement

Photo Galleries

Storms, Wildfires Tear Across U.S.

Heavy rain, high winds and fire continue to plague regions throughout the country.

Latest Campaign Videos