Ron Paul May Not Endorse Eventual Republican Nominee

Reader Comments
Back to blog

We need major changes to policies we are pursueing
towards the ecomomy (national debt), endless wars around the globe, personal freedoms/ liberty and less government in our lives. Ron Paul is the only canidate with a plan and a voice that addreses these issues.

Jim Pevehouse of AZ 12:05AM April 29, 2012

How can you call Ron Paul's following limited. Just compare a Mitt Romney rally to a Ron Paul rally. The numbers don't lie. Elections officials might... but the turnouts don't.
What I'm wondering is... When is Mitt Romney finally going to give up and endorse Barack Obama, I mean, he's doing everything else he can to guarantee a re-eletion. What a joke.

Martin of TX 7:42PM April 23, 2012

As a long time Republican and strong Ron Paul supporter, Ron Paul will be the only Republican I am voting for....unless more Libertarians run under that label. Once you finally 'get' Ron Paul's brand of Founding Father Libertarianism, the GOP plain flavor takes disgusting, almost as disgusting as the DEMs, in fact, it becomes hard to discern any difference at all. If Ron Paul does not get the GOP nomination, I will push for him to run as an Independent or else end up voting for the Libertarian Party Candidate. I can NOT believe the GOP wants us to elect Mitt Romney; the white Obama.
A conservative, a liberal and a moderate walk into a bar. The bartender says; "Hello Mitt".

James of MI 7:31AM April 23, 2012

I will vote Ron Paul. Following the election iw I'll be the first of generations to dump the Republican party and become an independent. the GOP is over and does not represent what it once did

eric of TX 5:49PM April 10, 2012

If you think Ron Paul is so whacko and so fringe and his opinions so meaningless then why are you wringing your hands about him not endorsing the Holy and Anointed One...? Why would you care...? Shouldn't you be saying "Nobody cares what the nut job thinks. Who listens to him anyways...?"

Carol of WA 4:37PM April 06, 2012

Paul won't endorse, and he shouldn't. The GOP needs to crash and burn. Considering the way they've treated Paul and his supporters? I don't expect the GOP to change, but maybe the rank and file and their candidates of choice will learn something about respect and decency.

Woody of OH 10:31AM April 06, 2012

I personally don't see any difference between Romney and Obama. Both tools of big government/Wallstreet. Neither will change anything. America is broke, and both will make it worse and enrich wealthy supporters.

james of OR 4:07PM April 05, 2012

We heard Gary Johnson comparing himself to Ron Paul a few days ago on The Colbert Report:
http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/411472/april-02-2012/gary-johnson

Steve of NH 1:35PM April 05, 2012

An endorsement of Romney is almost meaningless as Paul supporters will not vote for him anyway. Ron Paul has always stood for something. I can't see him selling out to the chickenhawk corporate raider. If he does, it will be to insure the political future of his son Rand and we won't hold it against him, but we know better then to vote for Romney.

Joanne of PA 12:37PM April 05, 2012

I hope Congressman Paul endorses the likely Libertarian Party nominee, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson - the best candidate who will be on the November ballot for those of us interested in limited, constitutional government.
www.garyjohnson2012.com

Ken Hamilton of AR 11:32AM April 04, 2012