• Comment (13)

Ron Paul Poised to Pull Ahead In Iowa

December 15, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Ron Paul, who was widely ignored by the media and Republican strategists for many months as a serious candidate, is now surging in Iowa and has become a force to be reckoned with.

To further propel his candidacy, Paul is expected to take an aggressive stance tonight against his two main rivals for the GOP presidential nomination, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts. In recent days, he has branded them as inconsistent conservatives who have strayed all over the map to curry favor with voters while Paul has remained steadfast in his beliefs that government should be cut back drastically and individual liberty allowed to flourish.

Paul's performance in the debate could be the difference between a first-place finish in the caucuses and lagging behind.

[Ron Paul Gaining Credibility By the Day.]

News media analysts are speculating that Paul, a libertarian and a member of the House from Texas, could actually win the Iowa caucuses on January 3, the first test in the GOP nominating process. A Public Policy Polling survey finds him one point behind front runner Newt Gingrich in Iowa, 20 percent to 21 percent. And Paul has an added advantage because his supporters have the kind of enthusiasm that will motivate them to get to the caucuses no matter what.

Paul is set to begin another fund-raising push to help finance a wave of TV ads in the coming weeks. Given the intense commitment of his backers and the momentum he appears to be generating, he will probably do very well.

Tags:
Iowa caucus,
Ron Paul,
Republican Party,
campaigns,
elections,
Newt Gingrich,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

A win by Dr. Paul in Iowa would serve to remind the GOP (and the whole nation) that neither Newt nor Mitt have any star power.

Muser of NM 7:06PM December 15, 2011

Dr. Paul needs to keep doing what he's doing. (Come to think of it, there's no chance that he'll do anything else.) Newt should shut up about the anti-capitalism critique of Romney and get back to being a visionary. Mitt should stay above the fray and attack Obama; Mitt looks better doing that than attacking his neighbors. And Jon Huntsman should stop babbling about the "trust deficit" and get back to being the Jon Huntsman, Conservative, that governed Utah to great success.

If only they listened to me... http://bit.ly/tfTbxk

Reasonable Views of CA 6:18PM December 15, 2011

Dr. Paul is a protector of individual rights, DOCAMG. If you bothered to listen to his stance on both topics, he insists that it is the States right to make decisions on these issues, NOT the federal government. This is the Founding Fathers intentions and his personal oath to the Constitution- to protect it! His personal beliefs on the matter may differ but unlike most (if not all) candidates, Dr. Paul seeks to protect our rights to choose and detests Federal mandates.

mpmohian of OH 1:25PM December 15, 2011

Ken Walsh's Washington

A longtime chief White House correspondent for U.S. News & World Report, Kenneth T. Walsh has covered five presidents beginning with Ronald Reagan. Along with other U.S. News writers, he continues to provide insight into the White House of Barack Obama and the world of presidential campaigns.

advertisement

Photo Galleries

Women on Death Row

Only 12 women have been executed on death row in the U.S. since 1976.

advertisement

Latest Videos