• Comment (6)

Success in Libya Unlikely to Aid Obama's Re-election Chances

October 21, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Praise keeps pouring in for President Obama's handling of the crisis in Libya that led to the death of former dictator Muammar Qadhafi, but it's unlikely to enhance Obama's prospects for re-election.

That's because, in poll after poll, most Americans are concerned about unemployment and the economy rather than national security. About 70 percent of voters say the country is headed in the wrong direction, stemming largely from growing problems at home, not abroad. [Read: 7 Challenges for a Post-Qadhafi Libya.]

Amog those who have praised Obama's careful and restrained approach to Libya was Sen. John McCain of Arizona, an influential voice on national-security issues who was the Republican presidential nominee in 2008. McCain told Fox News, "This is a victory for the president, the Obama administration, but most importantly" for the Libyan people. McCain's was a widely held view in Washington.

For his part, Obama said the occasion of Qadhafi's death marked "the end of a long and painful chapter" in Libyan history and was a "momentous day" for Libya's people. [Read: Rebel victory in Libya is a vindication for Obama.]

The deposing of Qadhafi is the latest in a series of foreign-policy successes for the administration. Obama earlier ordered the U.S. mission that killed terrorist leader Osama bin Laden, and he approved the separate operation that led to the death of terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki last month. He is also winding down the Iraq war, a move which many Americans favor.

The problem for Obama is that national security and foreign policy are far down the list of public concerns.

[Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the Middle East uprisings.]

And the fate of Libya is far from settled because no one knows the kind of regime that will replace Qadhafi. Obama warned that, "There will be difficult days ahead. But the United States, together with the international community, is committed to the Libyan people. You have won your revolution. Now we will be a partner as you forge a future that provides dignity, freedom and opportunity."

Obama added that Qadhafi's death vindicated his policy of supporting the Libyan rebels with air power and in other ways but not committing U.S. combat troops on the ground. "Without putting a single U.S. service member on the ground, we have achieved our objectives," Obama said.

Tags:
Muammar Qadhafi,
Barack Obama,
Libya,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

OMG, give the President a real break here. You really have that much hate for someone who only wants what is best and good for the USA and the world?

Sugarpye of LA 10:13AM October 24, 2011

Before we pat ourselves on the back for too long, let us review some basic facts!

We will see if there are 'triumphs'!

*Will Iran now take over the void we are leaving in Iraq? There are those in Iraq who feel that Obama could care less about Iraq! Let us not forget the reasons for our 20 year involvement in that country! Obama has done nothing but QUIT!

*Who will now rule Libya? Will they be pro or anti US? Will it fall into the Iran orbit? Will it become an Islamic republic? (Guess we will see within the next 8 months -- just in time for our November elections.)

Remember, Obama had to be coaxed by iron skirted women to provide support to the rebels in Libya in February and even into March of 2011. He was timid at best! Sure -- he would like to take credit for the kill -- but, was really at the right place at the right time. Give credit where credit is due -- to the rebels (and the French and Brits!)

That said, did Obama anticipate what would happen if Libya became an Islamic state? Under Sharia Law? The impact of the latter on the region? Just learned on October 23 that Tunisia is on the verge of doing the same thing. Is this what President Barack Hussein Obama wanted all along? The question has to be asked!

* What are we really gaining in Afghanistan? We have lost ground in the past 18 months. If this was Obama's war that had to be won, then why haven't we? Obama has been the commander - in - chief for THREE YEARS! Base on the 'close associations' Obama has built, Afghanistan is now indicating they will side with Pakistan if they go to war with the USA! (And Obama calls this international 'wins'??????)

*Now that our relationship with Pakistan has deteriorated, what have we allowed to be created in that Country? Remember, they are a nuclear power!

*And the real biggie -- WHAT HAVE WE DONE WITH THE REAL THREAT -- IRAN? Why did we not take positive action during the uprising in the summer of 2009? (Seems that we did not mind going after headlines in lesser uprisings -- Egypt, Libya and to a lesser degree, Tunisia -- and now ... UGANDA???????)

When one looks over the landscape of the Middle East, one sees ONE BIG MESS Obama has created – none the least of which is the distancing of our long term ally – Israel!

Taking a victory lap? “TRIUMPHS”? Not quite yet President Obama! Not quite yet! These are decisions history will determine -- not David Axelrod, Jay Carney, or Valerie Jarrett.

OldGrunt of FL 9:57AM October 24, 2011

I guess no one proofreads article over there at USNEWS

Killacode of NY 8:41AM October 24, 2011

Ken Walsh's Washington

A longtime chief White House correspondent for U.S. News & World Report, Kenneth T. Walsh has covered five presidents beginning with Ronald Reagan. Along with other U.S. News writers, he continues to provide insight into the White House of Barack Obama and the world of presidential campaigns.

advertisement

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos