Ron Paul Steady, Michele Bachmann Down in New GOP Gallup Poll

August 24, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (33)

Less noticed in the new 2012 presidential poll that pegs Texas Gov. Rick Perry in first place among announced GOP candidates, surging over former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, is fresh evidence that Rep. Michele Bachmann's popularity may be slipping, while Rep. Ron Paul's may be growing—or at least holding steady.

The Gallup poll, released Wednesday afternoon, validates the emerging narratives that Bachmann may have been a flavor of the month, and Paul may have staying power in the campaign. The two have flip-flopped since the same poll last month: Bachmann's score slipped 3 points to 10 percent, while Paul's grew 3 points to 13 percent. [Political cartoons on the 2012 GOP candidates.]

Before her July bump to 13 percent, Bachmann polled 7 percent in May and June. Paul's Gallup numbers have been a bit more consistent. He scored 12 percent in May and dipped to 8 percent in June before moving back up to double digits in July.

Perry's gains may be to blame for Bachmann's losses, however. As Danielle Kurtzleben reports, Perry's executive experience, job creation bona fides, and ability to appeal to a broader spectrum of voters may have lured support away from Bachmann and into the Perry fold.

Perry, who scored 29 percent, up from 18 percent last month, and Romney, who scored 17 percent, down from 23 percent last month, are still leading the pack. But the top tier may have shifted since Bachmann's victory at the straw poll in Iowa just a few weeks ago, when experts pegged the front-runners as Romney, Perry, and Bachmann, in that order.

Gallup polled Republicans and Republican-leaning independents between August 17 and 21.

In a Public Policy Poll, also released today, both Paul and Bachmann slipped among announced candidates as Perry took a strong lead in that poll with 33 percent. Bachmann led Paul in that poll 16 percent to 6 percent.

Tags:
Michele Bachmann,
politics,
Rick Perry,
Ron Paul,
2012 presidential election,
Mitt Romney,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (33)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

From Wiki:

"[Ron Paul] would eliminate many federal government agencies, such as the U.S. Department of Education, the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Department of Commerce, the US Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Internal Revenue Service, calling them 'unnecessary bureaucracies.'"

Any serious thoughts of him as a presidential candidate should be preceded by a study of the probable consequences of the actions above.

rtj of SC 7:23PM September 08, 2011

This is a guy that wants to dump the fed and move to a gold standard.

This is a guy with a whiny woman's voice and a racist son he named for Ayn Rand, the drug-addicted sociopath.

Ron says he's against these wars we're embroiled in. That's certainly a mark in his favor if it were true, but I suspect he'd just embroil us in different, even less justifiable conflicts, judging by the retarded comments he can't seem to stop making on the campaign trail.

He says he's against an intrusive government, but wants the politicians to decide who can marry or terminate an unwanted pregnancy. Maybe you see that as being consistent, but I don't.

Would he make a better President than Rick(s) Perry or Santorum? Yes .

Is he as downright skanky as Bachmann or Palin? No.

As to who ELSE I would suggest, I would guess Paul Ryan might be more electable, and a more far more sensible fellow should he be so fortunate as to be elected.

Jonathan Pulliam of MA 8:10AM August 28, 2011

I want to state that I have no real party affiliation and consider myself a social-moderate libertarian leaning centrist.

It should be pointed out that Melanie's comment, though poignant might be a dramatization of the facts. According to the image related to the Defense of Marriage act. Though it has a very clear anti-same-sex marriage theme, it supports dual-federalism, the right for states to decide for themselves based on the ideals of that's states population. He said he will fight for "each state's right to not be forced to recognize a same-sex marriage against the will of its people". The moral majority feels that marriage must be defended. The marriage is only a right for a man and a woman to be miserable together only for the intent of procreation. So with that thought if you're too old or barren, you should not be aloud to get married. I've told my girlfriend that we can get a civil union, but I don't want kids right now... so Washington says we can't get married. Maybe straight people are afraid that the homosexual community will make them look bad, by having happy and well-adjusted unions. I know it all comes down to God. Well, the bible's two most quoted passages are taken out of context. 1) Honor thy parents in the case of Moses, don't rape or gaze at your dad when he's intoxicated. 2) In the story of Sodom, don't rape angels or anyone else really. Has anyone read the old testament? It's not a good source of morals unless it's a blueprint for what not to do.

As for his pro-life views, he does say he would push for the government to not pay for any abortions or family planning programs. He has said he would push to appeal Roe vs. Wade. This specific flyer, states he would remove funding not remove the right but there is more of an impact beyond just reproductive rights at stake with this. Please read Freakonomics, Roe Vs. Wade indirectly reduced crime, saved lives and made the world a better place. I'm sure many of us have had politicians that we wished their parents would have used readily available free contraceptives. I'm sure we can all name at least one.

We need to rebuild, redirect, and restructure our federal government. Even if Ron Paul won, he would not be able to push laws past a Democratic Senate that would uphold Roe Vs. Wade. He might be able to get congress moving in the right direction. All of the GOP candidates are pro-life this race. If any of them get in, well, have the same problem. However, if we can get this country running correctly again, there's always 2016 to push these issues back. We survived 8 years of George Bush and we will survive another 4 years of who ever is next.

Daniel of CA 2:57PM August 26, 2011

Ken Walsh's Washington

A longtime chief White House correspondent for U.S. News & World Report, Kenneth T. Walsh has covered five presidents beginning with Ronald Reagan. Along with other U.S. News writers, he continues to provide insight into the White House of Barack Obama and the world of presidential campaigns.

advertisement

Photo Galleries

Storms, Wildfires Tear Across U.S.

Heavy rain, high winds and fire continue to plague regions throughout the country.

advertisement

Latest Videos