Ron Paul's Lament

August 17, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Ron Paul has a complaint. The U.S. representative from Texas finished a close second in the Iowa Republican straw poll of presidential preference Saturday, but his achievement has gotten little news coverage.

Until now.

What may end the near-news blackout on Paul is the sympathy that the outspoken libertarian is getting from an unlikely source, the liberal comedian Jon Stewart. [See photos of Bachmann on the campaign trail.]

The "Daily Show" host wondered why Paul was being ignored by the media, especially after he nearly won the Iowa straw poll, falling 152 votes short of victory out of nearly 17,000 votes cast. Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota came in first. "He's the one guy in the field, agree with him or don't agree with him, who doesn't just regurgitate talking points or change what he believes to fit the audience in front of him," Stewart said.

Media representatives say Paul has been ignored because, in reporters' and editors' estimation, he has virtually no chance to win the GOP nomination. But Paul's supporters reply that he would have a better chance if the media covered him and in any case he deserves just as much attention as the candidates he defeated in Iowa, including Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. Representative Bachmann of Minnesota came in first. [Read  Kim's Is Ron Paul a Fringe Candidate?]

Paul's complaints are starting to pay off as media decision-makers start to second-guess themselves. In addition to Stewart's comments, Paul landed an interview with Fox News yesterday in which he objected to being dissed by the news media and said that, as part of the establishment, journalists seem to be afraid to report what he says and seem blind to his appeal. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the 2012 GOP candidates.]

My prediction is that journalists will concede that he has a point and, most of all, start to see his campaign as an interesting story of a curmudgeon with conviction trying to beat the odds and refusing to give up. Watch for Paul to get a lot more coverage in the coming weeks, especially when a new round of presidential debates begins in September.

For more on Paul, read U.S. News's Mallie Jane Kim, Peter Grier's piece at Vox News, and the Washington Wire.

Tags:
Jon Stewart,
2012 presidential election,
politics,
Ron Paul

Reader Comments Read all comments (64)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Reporters based their blackout of Ron Paul's excellent showing in Iowa on their prediction that Ron Paul won't win. Why don't they stick to REPORTING instead of trying to predict the future? The answer, of course, conjures up a zillion other motivations such as: Ron would cause the Daddy WarBucks of the world to lose their military $millions, Ron would let Israel fend for itself, Ron would slash the size of the monster state, the main stream media are own heart and soul by the military manufacturers, the US is nothing more than Israel's defense department, Ron will not be a puppet of the Bilderberger/CFR/NWO handlers. Whatever.... These School-of-Pravda (state owned media) dinosaurs will soon discover that there's a revolution afoot that they can't hide from or cover up.

LiberyLooms of TX 11:04PM August 27, 2011

Nice! Hope that catches on.

jean of CA 1:58AM August 19, 2011

Thanks for the story! Save America and WE the PEOPLE! Vote RON PAUL 2012!

Mary of NV 7:45PM August 18, 2011

Ken Walsh's Washington

A longtime chief White House correspondent for U.S. News & World Report, Kenneth T. Walsh has covered five presidents beginning with Ronald Reagan. Along with other U.S. News writers, he continues to provide insight into the White House of Barack Obama and the world of presidential campaigns.

advertisement

advertisement

Latest Video