Susan Hockfield: MIT President Launches Energy Initiative

For battling scientific challenges, she is one of America's Best Leaders

October 22, 2009 RSS Feed Print
Susan Hockfield, President, MIT

Susan Hockfield, President, MIT

When Susan Hockfield was named president of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in August 2004, one of the first things she did was go on a listening tour. Her main question for students and faculty was what MIT, a longtime leader in scientific research, should focus on in the next decade. "I expected to get a lot of different answers, and, frankly, I did get a lot of different answers," Hockfield says. "But there was near unanimity that MIT needed to have a larger impact in solving the world's energy challenges."

At the time, MIT had dozens of labs doing energy research, but many professors were working largely in isolation. "There were lots of beautiful flowers, but no gardening—they weren't clustered in any way," she recalls. So over the course of the next two years, with the help of a faculty team, Hockfield outlined and launched the MIT Energy Initiative, wooing major investments from industry sponsors and bringing together scientists, engineers, and policy wonks to work on global energy problems. The initiative has become a leading voice on energy in Washington and a source of scientific advances in everything from solar power to carbon capture and sequestration technology for coal-burning power plants.

Group insight. Part of the Energy Initiative's success reflects Hockfield's long-standing commitment to collaborative research. Earlier in her career, Hockfield was a highly successful neurobiologist. She did her graduate work at the National Institutes of Health in a pain perception lab alongside colleagues from a range of disciplines—clinicians, pharmacologists, anatomists, and social workers—before she became a professor at Yale in the 1980s. Those experiences, she says, not only infused her own attitude on research but also shaped her efforts at MIT. "Part of the joy in doing science for me is not just that the experiments are great and the results are great but also sitting around with a group of people and talking over the experiments that are going on," says Hockfield, 58. "Someone, because of that group conversation, will have an insight that no one would have had on his or her own."

Today, leading one of the nation's premier institutions, Hockfield spends at least one day every four to six weeks in Washington, trying to shape the country's thinking about energy and science policy. She has pushed particularly hard to revive funding for energy research, which, until this year, had dropped precipitously since the 1980s as a portion of the federal research budget. "What's important is not just the extraordinary inventions we produce," she says, "but how we do the work."

America's Best Leaders 2009

Tags:
energy,
science,
MIT

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

In the name of this Planet with its 6,5 people and of the world moral money –the most looked-for matter today, I CALL, for the second time (the first time it was my comment about Al Gore, when he was awarded Nobel Prize) all the scientists of the USA and of the whole world, as well as those ones, who have already been fighting, (because Al Gore, The UN Panel, Hansen and the complete Committee are immoral and insincere) together with me for the Planet safety and its 6,5 billion people, to RISE UP at once against the robbery of my top knowledge – 5 times greater than that of the whole world, because they all are able to eliminate only 20% of CO2 emission, while I can do it 100% thoroughly. The Nobel Prize Committee are pretending to be insane not to know about unsuccessful work of the UN to stop the climate changes in the course of 42 years. If they had a bit of insight of the catastrophic UN and UN Panel work, they would never even figure, and let alone to UN and Al Gore award a Nobel Prize. The aim of the bought Nobel Prize was to bring Al Gore for the president of the USA instead of B.Obama. The honest UN Panel experts stood up against Al Gore, who in the first news, alone won the Nobel Prize. Later on the revolt was suffocated through the information that also UN Panel was awarded. Then after my comment it was published that Al Gore won some lauerate, not the Nobel Prize. After that Al Gore was expelled out of the UN Panel and all UN conferences on climate changes, as well as from all the world media. He was in Ljubljana, where no word was spoken of the Nobel Prize. With bracelets to attend The Live Earth Concerts (Al Gore) and the bracelets propose for Nobel Prize for Peace, not to beg in the streets, is an engaged pose, with what was lost any possibility to stop climate changes. To ask and get the Nobel Prize is uncultural. Billions of bracelets is a sea drop toward billions of my RH2FS in the whole sea; when the clamte change is extinguished by sea, or else to weigh either to a sea drop or to a sea give the Nobel Prize. How the Nobel Prize was bought for Al Gore, speaks the fact that today's potencial candidate for the president of the World Bank is Bono. Now Al Gore is hiding behind B.Obama.'s “Have committed early enactment of mandatory, economy-wide restriction on emissions, implemented through tradable permits and designed to reduce emission by 60 to 80 procent below 1990 levels by 2050.“ Al Gore won the Nobel Prize because he still today claims, that he has no idea, when the climate change will be stopped, because to reduce CO2 on 80% level the climate changes don't stop, so he has to give the Nobel Prize back, because, if there is no cure for cancer and AIDS, as well as for CO2, there is no award to anybody. That's why The Nobel Prize Committee deserves to be dismissed, because they are doing a job, for which they haven't a slight idea what it is like, as well as what is to be done with climate and CO2.

http://HitGator.com/?r=1134

Stjepan of CA 6:39PM October 22, 2009

If Al Gore on 09.02.2007 publically announced that he would give 25 million$ to anyone to eliminate CO2 emission from the air, then what kind of a stupid Nobel Prize Committee was it to reward Al Gore with 20 million$, in order that he can award someone who should eliminate CO2 emission. Because of this unseen scientific shame, the Nobel Prize should be annuled, as well Sweden must be expelled from the UN.

The UN Panel and Al Gore urgently have to give back the stolen Nobel Prize from me, and to allow to my World Award for Sustainability 2006 with its millions of RF2FS to step forward from the monstrous anonimity, to be allowed to save the Planet and its 6,5 million people until 2017. Why? Well, because the recent world knowledge simpy doesn't know how to do it. If there weren't for me today's arcitecture would be without PV. The on going energy crisis with 70% have given birth to my PVT patent P-2889/82 plus architecture energy. After my master's degree in 1990 solar energy industry rapidly has grown up. In 2007 I responded to Rio+10 and and called this energy crisis to save development viability by Project ID2007-00531, with which I found out so called capitalism of eternal happiness instead of current grabbing. I am able to connect uconnectable, ecology and economics directly or indirectly, and I'm giving to anyone a free house and its fully comfort, a free car with free drive gas. This sort of capitalism could accept my ideas just to shut the door to unrenewable energy resources to open their door to renewable energy recources, and the turnover would happen in a minute, the turnover we have been waiting for 40 years. Today my Earth and Mankind have to face two executions at the same time, what gives birth to an idea, again like in '70s, the greatest, humanitary idea.

http://getresponse.com/click.html?x=a62b&lc=Rsyv&mc=m&s=SFsHG&y=B&

All the other PV are ugly, unefficient, 10 times more expensive and at least five times shorter. Profession and media claim PV to be integrated in new architecture, but it's a lie. There is no integration in this architecture if the above mentioned PV is not in function of transmission, ventilation, energy, self-quantity of humidity, without energy losses. The world architecture still hasn't got that kind of quality, not even the Congress on 25.11.2009 in Erfurt, Germany, even though I based that standard 27 years ago with my P-2889/82, Patent-10 floor building with PV and thermal collectors integration, of which the world dreams still today.

With P-132/84 patent I yielded a thermosyphone collector, which is today illegally produced by about ten companies in the world, making their fortune through my knowledge.

With my master's degree work – 5 floor building 1990 patent I created the first world tube PV modul, today illegally produced by about ten companies in the world, which have been directly or indirectly copied from my work papers with direct, indirect and diffusive radiation.

http://getresponse.com/click.html?x=a62b&lc=Rsyv&mc=m&s=SFsHG&y=B&

I conclude that beside the collector table all the other sollar devices are my solut

Stjepan of CA 6:36PM October 22, 2009

AN INVITATION TO CONSCIOUS CHANGE AND SAVE MOTHER EARTH AND ITS CHILDREN

1960 The first ecological organizations and warnings of the experts

1972 The first UN Conference on the enviroment and dangers that threaten to the Earth and its children, more than 6 billions of them

1982 The Second UN Conference on the industry dangers, spending final and limited resources. “Eco development“ was offered

1984 The World Commission gives “The Global Agenda for Changes“, making the Foundation for development, rescuing the planet and its children

1987 Sustainable development was defined that fullfils current needs without withhold possibility for the future generations to fullfil their needs. (F.e. oil. That is why I called today's crisis with my project ID 2007-00531)

1992 The UN Summit in Rio about land gives the Agenda 21 to control the land, the water and the forests, unsustainable resources swallowed by industry, what is the inciting cause of the climate changes That is why we have to connect development to the enviroment, they have to be coordinated in order to save the Earth and 6 billion people.

1996 The Conference Rio + 5 in New Yourk concluded that a small progress was made in protecting the planet and its children. (Unfortunately even after 36 years of crying calls there is no change in consciousness in order to save the Earth and its people.

2002 The Worl Summit Rio+5 for one goal only – sustainable development of the Earth and its children. 60.000 delegates and 170 world leaders. (Even after 42 years they don't want to change their criminal consciousness and arrogant behavior to save the Earth and 6,5 billion people.

2003 Disappointed in general scientific consciousness of the whole world I have made a decision alone to fight for rescue of the planet and its people with my giant projects., applying the patent P20030072 I compete for the prize, so I was again called to compete the following year, at a regular competetion. Until 2006 I made millions of typical RH2FS and I applied them all for the world award 2006, when I won The World Award for Sustainability for my clean energy giant projects that reduce 100% of the CO2 until the year 2017, by which I only and I alone can save the Earth and its people with RH2FS.

Bast, 21.03.2009

Even father of the climate changes James Hansen hasn't got projects to remove the surplus of CO2. He only knows to suggest that thermo-electric power plants have to stop working until 2025 in the USA, and in the rest of the world in 2030. It is interesting to conclude that father of the climate changes wasn't awarded the Nobel Prize rather than A.Gore Junior. Not even the UN Conference in Poznan, Poland in the end of 2008 hasn't helped to reduce CO2 more than 20% and it won't be done until 2020.

Poznan is a criminal argument that knowledge of the whole today world will not or doesn't know how to save the Earth and 6,5 billion people, but I do know how and I want to, but they don't allow me to save the world from destruction. The UN Conference criminals are pretending to be insane, as if nothing ever happened between me, the UN Panel and Al Gore. And the crime did happen., for example: The Nobel Prize was awarded to the UN Panel and Al Gore, for only their humble knowledge for stopping only 20% of water, while the rest of even 80% is floodding a 6,5 billion people of the largest city and will drown all them. If the whole world's knowledge is able to reduce only 20% of CO2 emission, it means in ten years we shall all be killed, and it must be the greatest scientific crime and unremembered shame of the recent civilization. The UN Panel and the Conference in Poznan criminals as well as the Nobel Prize Committee must be taken to the International Court.

http://www.nowistheday.com/members/atoki21net/index.html

Stjepan of CA 6:33PM October 22, 2009

advertisement

Methodology

Choosing America's Best Leaders 2009

America's Best Leaders is a collaboration between U.S.News & World Report and the Center for Public Leadership at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government.

COMMENTARY: David Gergen

The National Deficit—of Leadership

President Obama fired the imagination of the country during his campaign, but the glow has faded.

COMMENTARY: MICHELLE OBAMA

The Future Lies in Teachers

Having good teachers in classrooms is critical because education is the road to opportunity, the first lady writes.

advertisement