• Comment (11)

Bike Sharing Systems Aren't Trying to Peddle for Profit

Many cities find that bike sharing isn't a revenue-generator. Does it matter?

April 17, 2012 RSS Feed Print
Bike sharing programs continue to grow across the country, despite not being able to turn a profit. (AP)

Bike sharing programs continue to grow across the country, despite not being able to turn a profit. (AP)

"If you ask [riders] the general question of 'Does having the bike share available in your city make you more or less likely to use transit throughout the year?', they'll say, 'It makes me more likely,'" says Dossett, explaining that riders can bike to work in the morning, but when it rains in the afternoon, they can bus home.

Pucher also says that bike sharing solves the "first-and-last-mile" problem for many commuters, expanding the reach and usage of existing public transit systems. He says that, while many people might only want to walk less than a mile to get to the nearest subway station, they might happily bike two miles to the subway.

With commuters putting forth extra effort to move about their communities, bike sharing can also increase commerce, helping to move consumers to and from areas that might otherwise be hard to reach.

[Go inside the Silicon Valley gender gap.]

There are also several non-economic benefits linked to bike sharing. Proponents say that it improves public health by encouraging non-bikers to try cycling, getting some exercise in the process. Likewise, environmental benefits and bike sharing are often mentioned in the same breath. Those exact benefits are difficult to measure, though. Bike sharing may promote exercise and reduce car trips to a certain extent, but it also replaces many walking trips with biking trips—making for no extra exercise, and eliminating no carbon emissions.

While making piles of money isn't the aim of many bike sharing systems, more revenue is always helpful, and cities are experimenting to improve their systems' bottom lines. Washington, D.C., has discussed putting advertising on bikes themselves, and New York may be the test case to watch for other cities that want to institute bike sharing without public funding.

Twitter: @titonka

Tags:
economy

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I think it's super! Used the system in Copenhagen, Denmark and loved the quieter streets, less stress in traffic, no need for parking, cleaner air and healthy benefits (No fat people there).

Public transportation is about spending less on road repairs, traffic and parking enforcement, expensive and unsightly parking lots, encouraging folks to live close to work - saving then also on gasoline, urban sprawl etc.... There are savings that are rarely counted when looking at costs....

DeeToo of SC 6:38PM June 14, 2012

Automobile drivers should be assessed a tax to be applied toward health (to protect against respiratory or cancer, per inhalation) or life insurance for cyclists (surviving family members).

cynthia anderson-bennekaa of AZ 6:28PM May 01, 2012

BikeShare is one of the best financial decisions a city can make. Why do you think so many cities are replicating it? Here's why:

1. The operating deficit, and even the capital costs, is so small as to be almost a rounding error in a large city's budget. It is about the cost of building one (yes, one) new street intersection! What a bargain!

2. By widening the ring of users around transit stations, it saves the city from having to provide new transit service (subway, bus) to those areas -- something that typically costs in the tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.

3. Your points about the public health benefits are contradictory. If bikeshare allows people in a 2 mile ring to get to transit -- as opposed to the 1 mile ring for pedestrians -- than you are adding all those people who can get the benefit of exercise. That extra mile is NEW public health benefit gain, not replacement.

4. Just because public health benefits are "difficult to measure" doesn't mean they don't exist.

Rob of NY 11:29AM April 26, 2012

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos