• Comment (6)

Is Tebow Taking a Pay Cut?

When Tim Tebow moves to New York, his multi-million-dollar salary could be worth a few million less.

March 22, 2012 RSS Feed Print

When Tim Tebow packs his U-Haul (or Gulfstream, or whatever a millionaire quarterback uses to move) to become a New York Jet, he could be giving up more than a view of the Rockies.

According to one measure, he could effectively give up millions of dollars in salary.

[See Three Big March Madness Losers]

True, the New York Jets will take over Tebow's current contract. But the cost of living in the New York City metro area can be painfully high, effectively reducing the value of any paycheck.

Tebow's five-year Broncos contract was worth a maximum of $33 million, averaging out to $6.6 million per year. That $6.6 million can buy a lot more in Denver than New York City. The cost of living in The Big Apple can be nearly twice as high as in Denver, according to the 2011 Cost of Living Index from the Council for Community and Economic Research, an organization that provides community data. The index measures relative price levels for different areas, based around an average equalling 100.

In Denver, the cost of living index is slightly above average, at 105. So if Tebow received $6.6 million in annual pay, it would be worth slightly less in Denver compared to the national average—around $6.3 million. But in Manhattan, the cost of living is more than double Denver's. If the cost of living were to remain relatively constant throughout Tebow's contract, this would mean that his $6.3 million in Denver would be worth somewhere around $2.9 million in Manhattan.

He could shop around, of course. If he embraces his inner hipster and moves to Brooklyn, he'll do a little better, at around $3.4 million. Across the river in Bergen-Passaic, N.J., near where the Jets play at MetLife Stadium, he can live even more cheaply, with his pay worth around $4.8 million a year.

Peyton Manning, who also this week announced a move from the Indianapolis Colts to the Broncos, will see a bump in the cost of living.

[John Carter Flops, but Disney Too Big to Fail]

Manning was under a five-year, $90 million contract at the Colts, making for an average of $18 million per year. With the Broncos, his pay jumps a bit, with a contract worth $96 million over five years, averaging around $19.2 million per year.

But adjusted for cost of living, Manning also takes a slight pay cut. According to figures from the third quarter of 2010 (the most recent period for which Indianapolis data is available), the Indianapolis cost of living is below average, and well below Denver's. Manning's $18 million in Indianapolis, compared to a national average cost of living, is worth around $20.6 million. Meanwhile, using the same data, $19.2 million in Denver is worth less than $18.5 million by national standards.

But don't cry for these quarterbacks just yet. All of these facts and figures don't take into account the other perks that go with being an NFL star.

"The team provides for all the players. You have a team nutritionist or a team acupuncturist or whatever. Everybody gets to use them," says Kenneth L. Shropshire, the director of the Wharton Sports Business Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania. In other words, players get some basic needs, like food and medical care, from their team. Not having to spend on every basic need can dampen the effect of a cost of living hike.

In addition, big stars like Tebow and Manning can get millions of dollars from endorsement deals, padding their pockets even more. It's still worth less in New York than in Denver or Indianapolis, but it can soften the blow of moving to a new, expensive place.

Why twenty-somethings could soon compete with Mom and Dad for internships.

Twitter: @titonka

Tags:
NFL,
salaries

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Bad economics. When you make that much money it isn't like you are spending it all on living expenses, unless your name happens to be Vince Young. No, if you are a normal person, most of that money goes into investments or buying luxury items in which you can shop around the country for. This pay cut is exaggerated for someone who makes that kind of money.

Wade of OK 11:27AM October 26, 2012

Quite frankly, the premise of this article is senseless. Yes, Tebow's cost of living will be increased by moving to New York - so much is obvious - but he is not taking a pay cut. I understand that, mathematically, his expenditures will increase, but I doubt that Tebow (and especially Manning) are going to see this move as financially significant. If I'm a professional quarterback making upwards of ninety million dollars over several years (Manning), the cost of living increase associated with the move is so profoundly insignificant that it's striking. You're talking about two athletes whos already extravagant incomes are supplimented by an array of endorsements. I just wasted probably three minutes reading an article talking about nothing, and was so disappointed at the end of it that I was compelled to take furhter time to write this statement regarding the article's quality. Forgive me for being crass, but the next time i want to experience taking a piss in the wind I'll walk outside and do it myself. At least that way I'll experience a certain amount of catharsis about the situation. Writing about Tim Tebow simply to write about the man is pitiful. I expect more out of this editorial.

Mack Whicker of AR 2:53PM March 23, 2012

I know this article is somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but from a realistic perspective, it misses a big point. There is a huge difference between $6.6 million/year and say $66,000/year. That $66k is going to be spent, and probably mostly in the place the person lives. Thus for 66k the cost of living is really important. Somehow, I just don't see Tim Tebow spending $6.6 million/year even in New York. I'm sure most of his salary, as well as endorsements, etc, will be invested. So, the local cost of living will probably be pretty much invisible to him.

RonFCCC of PA 2:11PM March 23, 2012

Photo Galleries

Women on Death Row

Only 12 women have been executed on death row in the U.S. since 1976.

advertisement

Latest Videos