• Comment (12)

How to Fix the Postal Service

Besides cutting offices and employees, it could try to best its competitors...or join forces with them

March 9, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Postal closures are back in the headlines, but surprisingly, this time the news is the decision not to shutter facilities.

The U.S. Postal Service announced this week that it will suspend planned processing facility closures in the months leading up to the November election. The move comes in response to worries from state officials that the closures would disrupt voting by mail.

The closures were part of a series of cost-cutting steps planned by the USPS, which is planning to close or consolidate more than 200 centers and slash up to 35,000 jobs. According to the postal service's five-year "Plan for Profitability" released in February, the USPS has an ambitious goal of cutting annual costs by over $22 billion by 2016.

Those are sizable cuts, given the USPS's roughly 574,000 career employees and $70.6 billion operating expenses in 2011.

Closures and cutbacks generate a lot of outrage, but there are other ways to bolster the post office's finances in the long term.

[Read about the different ways the job market is improving.]

Ask Congress for Money

To achieve long-term survival, the postal service may need subsidies in the shorter run, says one expert.

"For the medium term, beyond 2016, the U.S. Postal Service offers no published plan," says John Callan, managing director of Ursa Major Associates, a consulting firm that has worked with public and private mail carriers worldwide. In his opinion, continued declines in first-class mail mean more cost-cutting. "Subsidies seem inevitable in the medium term," he says.

However, obtaining those funds while improving its business model could help the postal service stave off the need for government help in coming decades, Callan adds.

Stop Paying for Retirees Before they Retire

In 2006, Congress passed a law requiring the postal service to "pre-pay" for health benefits for future retirees. Ending that requirement is one key tenet of the Postal Service's five-year plan. Though the APWU has largely rejected the plan, ending the prefunding requirement is one area on which both union and employer agree.

Postmaster General Pat Donahoe told a National Press Club audience in November that the $5.5 billion annual payments for retiree healthcare are "effectively bankrupting" the USPS.

Sally Davidow, spokesperson from the American Postal Workers' Union, agrees. In her estimation, the cause of the Post Office's fiscal problems is not declining mail volume; rather, she says, the prefunding requirement is the chief factor "leading to the destruction of the Postal Service."

Beat the Competition on Its Own Turf

The postal service already has plenty of unique assets, like an army of trained employees and established distribution channels. By leveraging these advantages, the postal service could move in on its chief competition's territory—shipping.

Shipping currently makes up 9.5 percent of USPS revenue, compared to the declining 66.8 percent represented by first-class mail. Package delivery, in which UPS and FedEx have dominant footholds, could be a profitable market.

"The business model needs to evolve," says Brandt Leahy, managing director of new market initiatives at financial information company Sageworks. "In 10 years, [packaging] has to make up a larger percentage of that business."

[See the upside to a slowing Chinese economy.]

Instead of Beating 'Em, Join 'Em

The hurdles to besting the competition may be too high to overcome. Though USPS operations are not funded by taxpayer money, Congress still oversees much of its operations. Moreover, the USPS is saddled with service obligations that no private company has.

For example, the postal service delivers first-class mail, unlike FedEx and UPS, and has the unique duty of providing "universal service." This is perhaps best seen in rural areas, where residents receive daily mail with the same regularity as urban residents, but do not have the same access to private couriers. In some places, getting to the nearest FedEx or UPS store can require an hour-long drive.

If the postal service can't beat its opponents, the next best thing might be joining forces. This has already begun in a limited way. Last year, 7 percent of USPS shipping revenues came from the "parcel select" program, in which FedEx, UPS, and other couriers handle packages, with the USPS handling the "last mile" of packages' journeys to customers' doors. The post office says that the program is growing by 20 percent each year.

In Callan's opinion, even bigger growth could be the key to survival. "The postal service could do a lot less and partner a lot more with the private sector," he says.

More Ads in the Mailbox

According to its five-year plan, the USPS thinks that direct mail—in which businesses circulate advertising to selected neighborhoods—could potentially be a chief area of future revenue growth. "If I'm a pizza shop and I want a menu to everyone in my neighborhood, I can bring it to the postal service, and [the mail carrier will] drop the piece off at everybody's door," explains Gary Reblin, vice president of domestic products for the USPS. The program will mean fuller mailboxes and, the USPS hopes, fuller coffers.

See why job growth might mean higher unemployment.

Read why the new iPad's features aren't that important.

See five shocking facts about student loan debt.

Tags:
Postal Service,
employment

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Here's a visualization comparing USPS income and expenses>> http://flapjackmedia.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/the-decline-of-the-us-post-office/

Flapjack Media of NC 9:33PM April 13, 2013

I agree about the Postal General and Board..They make a lot more than they should...they are appointed to their jobs and are business men who try to run the post office like a business it is a service organization...never was expected to make money...the Postmaster Gen makes more than the US President!

Jo Cukr of MI 9:56AM April 11, 2013

The USPS has many options available. However, they must get changes through Congress and by their unions. Cutting service is an accounting office idea. What is overlooked is ho that change in service will affect the customer. Cutting too deeply will drive up overall transportation costs and change the way the customer uses the service. Right now, USPS worker is the "Best Loved" of all govt employees (yeah, I know)... People know, trust and wish to keep their carrier.

A focus more on the areas where costs are high-per-unit delivered would be a great start. Contracting these areas to local couriers would add coverage and maintain service. Many small towns have a different courier service every day for medical test specimens, eyeglasses, bank deposits and checks as well as the usual Brown and Purple package carriers.

why does the USPS own so many buildings-? Could soe be sold and leased back-? Many a transportation company has done this and freed up cash for expansions and changes in operations. Perhaps some facilities could also serve as co-locations for franchise services-? Any drive along the interstates will see pairings that would have been unthinkable 10-20 years ago.

As many a politician is fond of saying, about many different problems; "It took a long time to get into this situation. we cannot expect miracles overnight." From the private enterprise view, that is tru only as far as it goes. Unless one commits to changing practices and examining legacy habits the costs will continue to rise... and rise... and rise. This applies to many problems that face our nation not jut this single issue.

Andy Johnson of OR 10:49AM March 21, 2012

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos