• Comment (3)

Why Job Growth Might Mean High Unemployment

The monthly ADP report shows improvement once again, but encouraged job-seekers might keep unemployment high

March 7, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Payroll processing firm ADP reported Wednesday that private employment grew by 216,000 last month, a bump of 43,000 jobs over January's figure. ADP's numbers suggest improvement in even the economy's weakest areas: construction has sustained five consecutive months of job growth, and there have also been seven consecutive months of growth in financial services. Both of those industries sustained heavy job losses as a result of the housing and financial crises. Manufacturing, which had seen more than a decade of decline before the recession, also added 21,000 jobs.

[See why accelerating GDP isn't quite a reason to cheer.]

The report sets the stage for a strong jobs report on Friday, but according to Joel Prakken, chairman of economic consulting firm Macroeconomic Advisers, sustained declines in unemployment going forward seem unlikely, even if businesses continue adding jobs. If and when people start rejoining the labor force again, it will mean a higher unemployment rate.

"When a sentiment spreads that the economy is really starting to improve rapidly, we think that people who have abandoned their search for jobs are going to jump back into the labor force, and the participation rate is going to rise," says Prakken.

His comment exposes one weakness of the unemployment rate: it doesn't count discouraged workers—those who have given up the job search—or other people who have left the labor force. A falling unemployment rate, therefore, might mean that potential workers have left the labor force, while a high jobless rate might mean that more people are enticed into the job market by a growing number of jobs.

The labor force participation rate has declined more or less steadily since 2008. In January of that year, 66.2 percent of Americans 16 and over were in the labor force. By January 2010 it was 64.8. In January 2012, it was 63.7.

[See the upside to a slowing Chinese economy.]

That decline in job-seekers may have contributed to recent rapid drops in the unemployment rate, which plummeted from 9.1 percent last August to 8.3 percent in January. According to Prakken, the job growth that the nation has experienced over that timeframe doesn't quite account for all of the improvement in the jobless rate.

Prakken points out that, not long ago, unemployment was over 10 percent. "If you went back ... and told people that the unemployment rate would be pressing 8 percent by now, with the kind of economic and job growth we've had, people would have thought that's not possible," he says.

In other words, even if ADP and the Labor Department continue to show strong, and perhaps even accelerating job growth, the headline jobless rate might not fall accordingly; what's beneath the headline provides a clearer, if more complex picture.

Tags:
employment,
economy,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"His comment exposes one weakness of the unemployment rate: it doesn't count discouraged workers—those who have given up the job search—or other people who have left the labor force."

And that makes his estimate as bogus as the numbers from the government. We are being spoonfed an artificially low rate by the government and media (so thank you, US News, for printing the real number, even if you didn't mention it's the lowest since the Carter days).

Employment must go up -- all employment.

Jsmith of VA 7:52AM March 08, 2012

Unemployment in construction is 21.2%, I wish these guys would tell the truth. We all need to education ourself in this tough market only way is a degree or change your career.. search online for High Speed Universities for career advice

daviddennyz of CA 3:51AM March 08, 2012

"The labor force participation rate has declined more or less steadily since 2008. In January of that year, 66.2 percent of Americans 16 and over were in the labor force. By January 2010 it was 64.8. In January 2012, it was 63.7."

Gallup's figures show the opposite; an increase over the past 3 January's. In January 2010 they show a participation rate around 63%, 2011 around 64%, and 2012 around 65%.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/125639/Gallup-Daily-Workforce.aspx

Matt 6:27PM March 07, 2012

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos