Obama: Birth Control Policy Meets Everyone's Needs

Barack Obama says he's found a solution that will protect religious liberty but also ensure that women have access to free birth control.

February 10, 2012 RSS Feed Print

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama declared Friday he's found a solution that will protect religious liberty but also ensure that women have access to free birth control, as he rushed to defuse an election-year political uproar that threatened to overtake his administration.

Capping weeks of growing controversy, Obama announced he was backing off a newly announced requirement for religious employers to provide free birth control coverage even if it runs counter to their religious beliefs. Instead, workers at such institutions will be able to get free birth control coverage directly from health insurance companies.

"Religious liberty will be protected and a law that requires free preventative care will not discriminate against women," Obama said in a brief appearance in the White House briefing room.

"I understand some folks in Washington want to treat this as another political wedge issue. But it shouldn't be. I certainly never saw it that way," Obama said. "This is an issue where people of good will on both sides of the debate have been sorting through some very complicated questions."

Tags:
Associated Press,
Barack Obama,
birth control

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Contraception is not just for people who are not married, so saying that sex should be just kept to marriage as an argument against paying for contraception is a fallacy. It's lumping apples with oranges. The majority of married women practice some sort of contraception, and they aren't getting their pills covered, either. Contraception should be a woman's choice, not the government's, not the church's, not a pharmacist's, and not an insurance company's choice. It's not even contraception vs abortion - many accidental pregnancies within marriage are carried to term, whether the parents can afford it or it's healthy for the mother or not.

Diana of GA 3:51PM March 09, 2012

Why can't we make this sex-neutral and have them pay for the male's condoms and b. c. pills? I think the insurance company premiums or the tax payers should make this "free" b. c. available to both sides of the equation....otherwise it's sexually-biased. By the way, the clear advantage is that there may not be additional abortion costs or dependents added looking forward.... And free sex for all!!

W. Berning of NJ 1:47PM March 05, 2012

The issue is not contraception. The problem is that so many people think abortion is a method of contraception. Contraception prevents conception from taking place-before life begins. Abortion kills a baby in the womb. To some people that doesn't make any difference. To others abortion is murder of the unborn. If you believe that abortion is murder, the government should not be able to force you to pay for it. That is a matter of conscience. Then again, if sex were kept in marriage where it belongs we wouldn't have such a huge problem.

Birdlady of MI 12:47PM March 03, 2012

Photo Galleries

Before and After the Joplin Tornado

A look at Joplin one year after the deadly tornado.

advertisement

Latest Video