Indiana Passes Right-to-Work Legislation

The minority Democrats acceded to the mathematical reality of the Republican's 60-40 majority in the chamber

January 26, 2012 RSS Feed Print

INDIANAPOLIS — In the end, they just didn't have the votes.

For two legislative sessions, Indiana Democrats fought the divisive labor measure known as right-to-work. They offered amendments aimed at changing the bill. They sought to put the issue before voters in a referendum. And in their most high-profile gambit, House Democrats staged occasional boycotts to deny the Republican-dominated chamber enough members to conduct business.

[See the latest political cartoons.]

But that all ended Wednesday when the minority party acceded to the mathematical reality of the Republican's 60-40 majority in the chamber. Democrats showed up, and the Indiana House voted 54-44 to make Indiana the 23rd right-to-work state.

It is the latest successful legislative push targeting union power following a Republican sweep of statehouses in 2010, and if Gov. Mitch Daniels signs the bill as expected it will make Indiana the first Rust Belt state to ban contracts that require workers to pay mandatory union fees for representation.

Highlighting his party's lack of power, House Minority Leader Patrick Bauer said Wednesday that his caucus' ability to stall the measure for even a few weeks itself constituted a success, of sorts.

"The fact that the Senate is going to have another week on this was probably undreamed of by (Republicans)," he said, referring to the likely timeline for passage in the Indiana Senate. "They never though that a full month would go by before they shoved this down the employees of the state's throats."

The measure faces little opposition in Indiana's Republican-controlled Senate and could reach Daniels' desk shortly before the Feb. 5 Super Bowl in Indianapolis.

"This announces, especially in the Rust Belt, that we are open for business here," Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma said.

[Obama's State of the Union Failed.]

Indiana is the latest Midwestern state where Republicans have pushed labor legislation with safe voting margins even as the efforts have drawn large protests by union backers and spawned recall efforts.

Wisconsin and Ohio last year passed laws stripping most public sector unions of collective bargaining rights. In both states, the laws provoked a firestorm. Wisconsin Democrats staged a similar, and similarly unsuccessful, boycott of their chamber for a time but also lacked the votes to ultimately kill the measure. Its passage sparked a backlash and the ongoing efforts to recall GOP Gov. Scott Walker and several Republican legislators. In Ohio, the law was handily repealed in November by voters in a referendum, a stinging defeat for GOP Gov. John Kasich and his Republican allies.

In Indiana, it's unclear whether Wednesday's vote marks the end of the controversy or a new phase.

But without the votes, Democratic opponents and a handful of Republicans who crossed party lines to oppose the measure, were left only to deliver emotional pleas to block it.

Democratic Rep. Linda Lawson called the Republican measure an attack on the union strongholds throughout the state.

"What you are doing is destroying my community!" said Lawson, who represents a northwest Indiana district packed with heavy manufacturers and a major BP oil refinery.

[What Else Is Mitt Romney Hiding Besides His Taxes?]

"What if I came into your community and said 'No more cows' and 'No more pigs?'" she said, referring to the agriculturally heavy districts represented by many of the Republicans who supported the bill.

Indiana would mark the first win in 10 years for national right-to-work advocates who have pushed unsuccessfully for the measure in other states. But few right-to-work states boast Indiana's union clout, borne of a long manufacturing legacy.

Oklahoma passed right-to-work legislation in 2001 but has a rural-based economy that produces comparatively fewer union jobs than Indiana.

Teamsters President Jim Hoffa sounded resigned to the right-to-work measure's passage, in a statement released shortly after the vote, but promised a voter backlash like those seen in other Midwest states.

Tags:
Indiana,
employment,
economy,
Associated Press

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Unions are just like the "Affirmative Action" BS. They require companies to employee someone who isn't necessarily the best-qualified person for the job, because of WHO THEY ARE, not WHAT THEY KNOW.

Would the automakers have needed a bailout if they were able to hire similarly-capable non-union workers, for HALF the union-wages, and fire the ones who were refusing to work?

Workers' rights, and criminals' rights, are drastically in need of an overhaul in this country!!! (You WORK for what I'm offering, or go look for another job... It's a free country...) (I mean, it's not slavery! You can do the work for what's offered, or go somewhere else!! If you can't "afford" to go somewhere else, maybe you should shut up and do your job, while someone is offering to pay you for it!!!

The Watcher of IN 10:08PM January 28, 2012

i think we should impeach mitch , this is the land of the brave , the free ,we the people decide wats best for our state not 30 or more people to decide ,its we the people

roni miller of IN 10:59AM January 28, 2012

Well, forgive me, then for speaking out of ignorance. But, since unions are so wonderful for the worker, why are you concerned about “right to work”? If unions really work to the advantage of the worker, they will see no decrease in membership. You still have a right to be in a union. “Right to work” just ensures that an employee who doesn’t want to join a union doesn’t have to...that’s called “freedom”.

I expect that within a year you will start to see your union start acting on your behalf. Knowing that they don’t have a lock on your wages, they will start to work in your true interest for their portion. As a result, you and your coworkers will keep the money flowing to them. However, when your union starts to act in ways that are detrimental to them, such as shoveling money into political coffers of candidates the workers don’t support, or strangling the employer, that membership will start to fade away. This is called “accountability”, and my sincere hope is that you and all of my fellow Hoosier workers will benefit from that. God bless you.

Jeff Arnold of IN 9:41PM January 27, 2012

Photo Galleries

All the World's a Carnival

See spectacular images from carnival celebrations.

advertisement

Latest Video