• Comment (6)

Will Dems Call New Tax Law 'The Romney Rule?'

Democrats say public pressure will bring Republicans around on taxes.

January 25, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Buoyed by a feisty State Of The Union address and seeing a juicy target in Mitt Romney's tax returns, Senate Democrats announced Wednesday that they plan to force votes on key parts of the president's platform, including the goal of ensuring that millionaires pay at least a 30 percent income tax rate.

In fact, the so-called Buffett Rule, named after financier Warren Buffett, who allegedly pays a lower tax rate than his secretary, may soon have a new name.

"So, it's a priority for us to act on some kind of Romney—I mean, Buffett rule," said Democratic New York Sen. Charles Schumer. It was not a mistake.

[Myths About Romney and the Rich]

Romney released his tax returns Tuesday, showing that despite earning more than $40 million total in 2010 and 2011, he paid an effective tax rate of about 14 percent—because most of the money was classified as capital gains, not income.

"Don't be surprised if election year pressures in 2012 may push Republicans to cooperate with this president more than they might be planning to," Schumer said. "We intend to test this theory out, by pursuing major chunks of the president's middle-class agenda."

But Schumer and other Democrats have let to lay out exactly how they'll try to achieve the goals set out by the president. Available options include letting the capital gains tax increase, capping deductions for high-income Americans, or maybe setting up a stronger alternative tax which the rich would have to pay if their taxes dip too low.

The strategy of using forced votes to push the issue—which are unlikely to become law, but would put the GOP on the spot—is a somewhat different strategy than House Democrats have pursued. Rep. Sander Levin, an influential Michigan Democrat, had advocated using the payroll tax cut debate as a way to push through higher taxes on the super-rich. But on Wednesday, Reid said that strategy might be a mistake.

"Realistically, I don't think that's the place to do tax reform," Reid said. 

 aparker@usnews.com

Twitter: @AlexParkerDC

Tags:
State of the Union,
Warren Buffett,
Chuck Schumer,
Barack Obama,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Which is worse: Romney paying 14% on 40 million or GE paying 0% on 5 billion? As long as corporate tax structures allow for GE to pay nothing while exporting jobs, the Romneys are not the issue

Moment of clarity of TX 6:53PM February 01, 2012

To all Republicans running for office...

Please explain to the public that there is a difference between the tax codes as defined by Obama.

nvrat of NV 11:15AM February 01, 2012

What's wrong with people, even the rich, paying their American taxes. They live here, not across the seas, or any offshore location. Why, and how are the rich getting richer? If it's not like the poorer paying more in taxes then they are, and then giving our jobs to the foreign markets. What if they live in those foreign markets, what would become of all of us? I think our founding fathers would all turn over in their graves with the shame of all of it.

bev church of CO 7:40PM January 29, 2012

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos