• Comment (4)

Debates Hold Key to Newt Gingrich Success

As many predicted, Newt's performance won South Carolina. But will it hold?

January 23, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Whatever Newt Gingrich was doing, it wasn't a serious presidential campaign. He wasn't a manager ready to wage a realistic underdog bid for the White House, but rather a political dilettante treating the campaign trail like it was another round of Sunday morning talk shows.

At least, that was the conventional wisdom about the former House Speaker for months.

But Gingrich's campaign sure didn't look like a gadfly candidacy on Saturday night in Columbia. With more than a thousand supporters packed and overflowing a Hilton in the downtown of South Carolina's capital, flanked by Congressmen and state officials to celebrate his stunning victory in the state's primary.

Most of his supporters were in agreement that night—it was Gingrich's deftness in the televised debates which made the difference, particularly his furious response to questions in a CNN debate regarding allegations from his ex-wife Marianne that he wanted an open marriage between her and his current wife, Calista. His thunderous response—capping off one of the craziest days in campaign history—brought the audience to their feet, and South Carolinians to the polls.

[Cary: Why Newt Gingrich's 'Open Marriage' Request Matters]

"The debate was huge," says Jim Ulmer, a GOP county official from nearby Orangeburg county. And the numbers tend to back that up—according to CBS exit polls, two thirds of voters said the debates were "very important" to their decision. Gingrich aides and supporters also said Romney's waffling on the tax issue mad him vulnerable.

"He walked out of that debate with a crisis of credibility," says Col. Michael Steele, a Gingrich supporter. "It wasn't the issues, it was the way he stumbled and fumbled on the issues."

It's leading many to wonder if the rules of the game have changed. In today's media-saturated age—when supporters can literally watch an inspiring speech or debate put-down in the palm of their hands—is a dazzling personality enough to overcome advertising, endorsements, and the other traditional building blocks of politics? Richard Peterson, a South Carolina Gingrich supporter who worked at the Republican National Committee under Lee Atwater, the legendary Republican consultant who's known for writing the book on modern GOP campaigning, says Gingrich's victory shows that paid media can't compete with a good debate performance anymore.

[See photos of the Republican contenders on the campaign trail.]

"It allows him to demonstrate his intelligence in a way that a canned 30-second ad can't," says Peterson.

In the end, Romney's dollars may have ended up hurting him. Overwhelmed voters were turned off by endless robocalls and flyers.

Supporters hope the momentum of this win can boost him into Florida, and that campaign dollars will start to flow and allow him to challenge Romney's campaign, which boasts that it was built for the long haul. And he'll have to contend not only with Romney, but with establishment officials within the Republican Party, convinced that a Gingrich candidacy, against Obama, would be suicidal.

Gingrich supporters in South Carolina also claim that Romney was guilty of laziness—resting on millions in advertising and endorsements from key state officials, including Gov. Nikki Haley, while letting personal appearances slip by. Many were gleeful that Haley, a Tea Party star who's seen her brightness dim in the state recently, saw her endorsement of Romney go up in flames.

Romney still has many advantages heading into the next few contests. Florida, which holds its primary on January 31, is favorable terrain for the Massachusetts governor—especially since retirees may have already sent in their absentee ballots. As the states get bigger, Romney's financial advantage will become more powerful. But he'll be facing the one thing he dreaded: a two-person contrast against someone who excites the passions of conservative voters.

Tags:
2012 presidential election,
Republican Party,
Newt Gingrich,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Susie from Old Florida

"His debate performance was filled with racist comments and code words..."Food stamp president?""

I can't stand Newt, but how come everytime someone doesn't believe something that someone said about Obama they throw the race card out there!? This shows us that what you have to say has no relevance and means nothing because the best thing you have is the race card. Look at the facts! Obama has given more handouts out to more people, regardless of race or color, than any other president. So yes, he is the "food stamp president!" The fact that you think that statement has to do with only black people and not white or brown or orange or purple is ridiculous. Actually...wouldn't that make you a racist??? Something to chew on.

Colt from Big Florida too of FL 9:50AM January 23, 2012

Do you have to be someone who grew up in the South to recognize a major reason Newt won in SC? His debate performance was filled with racist comments and code words. South Carolina is the one of the most racist states in the union, even today. That is one thing the evangelicals, tea partiers and conservatives have in common, although they all would deny it. "Food stamp president?" hello? From Georgia, Mitt is a good ol boy, who knows how to wink and nod with the best of them

Susie from Old Florida of FL 8:52AM January 23, 2012

Regardless of how Newt Gingrich's red-meat loving supporters feel about his debating skills, the truth is that Newt is an empty vessel whose best attribute is deflecting criticism away from himself. Besides spouting useless trivia to impress his audience, Newt relies on attacking the media anytime a legitimate question is raised concerning his character, or some unethical thing from his past. As a television commentator said so well recently, "Newt has so much baggage that his baggage has its own baggage!" But you can't ask Newt a question about how he cheated on his wife while she was battling cancer, or how he profitted from Freddie MAC to the tune of $1.6 million, or why he was thrown out of congress and fined $300,000 without seeing Newt pivot to turn the person asking the question into someone with a personal vendetta against him. This arrogant flip-flopping hypocrite is exposing a segment of the population for which character, moral values, and ethical behavior mean nothing. The thought of someone as disgusting as Newt actually being the leader of the free world does not matter to his establishment supporters, who only seem to hear the words "beat Obama" when Newt opens his mouth to speak. They never consider the fact that Newt has missed the filing deadlines for his candidacy now in multiple states (including his home state of Virginia). He now has no mathetical chance to get enough delegates to win the nomination. Do you think that the people who blindly support Newt ever think about this? Do you think that these people believe that Newt has the best economic plan? What plan? Newt likes to talk about how different he is from Obama, yet he offers little to no detail on how the two differ, and his proposals are weak at best. Newt is a neocon scumbag. Our country deserves better!

Ron Paul 2012!!

Bob Vondruska of CA 2:58AM January 23, 2012

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos