Immigration 2011: Deportation, 'Administrative Amnesty,' Harsh State Laws

Why 2011 may have presented a reason to hope for immigration reform

December 29, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Another year, another political can kicked down the road.

An estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants still live in the United States, and this year Congress kept up its decades-long trend of neglecting to pass any meaningful reform.

It doesn't break evenly by party, but Democrats typically pursue what they call "comprehensive immigration reform," which would include enforcement, a guest worker program, and a path to legalization for illegal immigrants. Republicans have typically said they won't think of any other policy until the U.S.-Mexico border is completely secure.

Immigration policy has been primarily enforcement-based since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and though the Obama administration has tried to focus that enforcement on dangerous criminals, 2011 followed the same trend.

Here is a look back at key stories in immigration policy this year:

[Check out a roundup of editorial cartoons on immigration.]

Obama's Record Deportations / Prosecutorial Discretion

President Obama's policy in 2011 has him stuck between a rock and a hard place politically, criticized by both sides of the immigration debate.

In October, the Obama administration announced it had deported a record of nearly 400,000 individuals in fiscal year 2011. And about 55 percent of those were convicted felons, according to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE.

[Read: DHS task force puts ICE's 'Secure Communities' at risk.]

Meanwhile, in June, ICE Director John Morton released a memo asking agents to exercise "prosecutorial discretion" on immigration cases to determine whether or not each case fits with the administration's goals of prioritizing deportation of illegal immigrants who are criminals or national security risks. Agents were asked to consider a range of factors in deciding if they should drop a case, including family issues, age, ties to the community, and more.

In November, the administration announced it would review the backlog of deportation cases to dismiss those involving people who would have received prosecutorial discretion.

Some in the immigrant rights community praised the review as a good start, but are hesitant to give it the full thumbs up quite yet. "We hope that that's being used to the benefit of a lot of people," says Christy Fujio, director of asylum programs for Physicians for Human Rights. "But we still hear stories about families being ripped apart, and people being put in immigration detention and eventually being deported for really minor infractions."

Others are frustrated with what they see as Obama playing both sides of the fence. "This administration is trying to be tough on enforcement and be a strong campaign for immigration reform," explains Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, an immigrant-rights group. "At the end of the day, Obama is not going to get the credit of hard-line restrictionists for record deportations," Noorani says. "He's only going to get the grief from the families that have been destroyed."

Critics on the other side of the debate question the administration's motives for upping deportations since Obama has been clear he wants reform to include a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.

"I believe that's just another part of the political rhetoric in trying to say that: We are strong on immigration enforcement," says Jessica Zuckerman, a research assistant for the conservative Heritage Foundation. But, she adds, the administration may at the same time be "trying to put forward these amnesty proposals and use [deportations] as fuel."

Tags:
immigration reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

All these gung ho anti immigration folks start producing dozen babies per couple so that USA will have plenty of labor supply.Look at Japan that traditionally does not have immigration and their nation is dying.Build the biggest fences and wipe out all illegals while making no babies or very few babies born to mothers' who have health/drug elated issues, and soon we shall be bigger version of Japan.

The dogs in the Manger do not remember what Jesus said, compassion for fellow humans is not their forte unless the other person is alike them.No capacity to live in peace with different people.Persons speaking other language are less than dogs to you then remember when you die all your deeds will be laid before you at Judgement time.At least the Almighty is not subject to Constitution or USA borders.

Kiku of NE 1:14PM March 19, 2012

Yes! Please Pay Attention to those People (like me) been separated to my family for a longest time since 1997 not to mention the time we're on process in court (1994), I have tried to go back there ( i'm fr: Philippines)got interviewed lasy 2007 and still the same reasoning But the point is everything has been settled and done. We we're talking 'bout here is my "FAMILY". What was the Helpful way you guy's can Help the small people like us been a Taxpayer, worked hard as a Simple Citizen who are willing to lived rightfully and Peaceful. Can you hear us. We had suffer Enough, long years not being with Family. How we can Live life if we Keep separating the Family?

Dennis Franklin of MO 10:14PM January 06, 2012

What about WW2 war criminals? If they came here after the war and have worked and lived crime free lives, are a member of a local church, have paid their taxes, and been productive members of American society do we give them amnesty for what they did during the war?

We claim this nation to be a nation of laws! The truth is we are not a nation laws because we find one excuse after another for not enforcing our laws or our Constitution~

Recently courts in California impaired contract and made it worthless. When the state and judges were sued for the denial of contract rights caused by that impairment they admitted they have violated the Constitution and denied inherent rights of citizens. However they were given immunity from the suit by a judge in federal court when that judge had no more authority to allow the Constitution to be violated than the original judges. No one is given immunity from our Constitution nor is any branch of govt given authority to create immunity from it.

zuma of CA 11:56AM December 30, 2011

advertisement

Latest Video