• Comment (3)

Newt Gingrich Sharpens Attacks on Mitt Romney, Ron Paul

December 28, 2011 RSS Feed Print

DYERSVILLE, Iowa — So much for staying positive.

In just the last 24 hours, Republican presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich has blasted rival Mitt Romney as a "Massachusetts moderate" who isn't "man enough" to take responsibility for the harsh attack ads being run on his behalf. And he lambasted Ron Paul's views as "totally outside the mainstream of virtually every decent American."

As his lead in Iowa polls has evaporated, Gingrich's rhetoric has grown ever sharper, even as he insists — sometimes in the same breath — that he's running a positive campaign.

"I am not going to go negative, period," Gingrich said Tuesday at a campaign stop in Dyersville, Iowa, to appreciative murmurs from the crowd that had crammed into the National Farm Toy Museum to hear him speak. That remark came after a CNN interview in which he said he wouldn't vote for Paul if the Texas congressman became the GOP nominee and he mocked Romney for not having the courage to face him in a one-on-one debate.

[Opinion: For Gingrich, the Personal Is Political]

It is classic Gingrich, the bomb-throwing leader of the Republican revolution who even now seems to chafe at minding his manners. He acknowledged Tuesday that it has taken "discipline" not to counterpunch as the attacks have flooded in.

So he is trying to have it both ways.

In Dubuque, Iowa, at the first stop of a 22-city bus tour leading up to Jan. 3 caucuses, Gingrich offered Romney praise, then promptly opened fire.

"I don't want to be invidious about Gov. Romney, who I said I think is a very competent manager and a very smart guy," Gingrich said. "But to have somebody who is a Massachusetts moderate, who said he did not want to go back to the Reagan-Bush years, who voted as a Democrat for Paul Tsongas in '92, who campaigned to the left of Teddy Kennedy.... to have him run a commercial that questions my conservatism?"

In the evolving Gingrich playbook, statements which are factually accurate are not attacks.

"I was describing him accurately," he said in South Carolina last week after taking a jab at Romney.

For Gingrich, taking the high road may be a strategy born as much out of necessity as ideology.

His campaign nearly collapsed earlier this year, so he trails the other Republican frontrunners in fundraising, which limits his ability to launch a sustained negative campaign.

[Who Will Win the Iowa Caucuses?]

The former Georgia congressman also seems to have made the political calculation that to win over voters, he must soften some of the brash rough edges that defined his tenure as House speaker.

After all, he made his political reputation perfecting the art of using words as weapons.

A 1996 memo to Republican House candidates, which Gingrich endorsed in a cover letter, urged Republicans running for office to use words like "traitor," ''pathetic" and "sick" to define Democratic opponents, their proposals and their party. "Language matters,'" the memo said.

Campaigning for the White House, he has taken his own advice.

A favorite Gingrich technique in recent weeks has been to extol his campaign's positive tone while eviscerating nameless GOP opponents, using words like "disgusting" and "reprehensible."

"Shame on them for not caring enough about America to be positive," he said.

He has a receptive audience in Iowa voters, weary of being bombarded with nasty robocalls, mailers and television ads as the primary hurtles into the final days.

"I'm just sick of it all," said Bette Carlson, who showed up to hear Gingrich speak at Mabe's Pizza in Decorah, Iowa, Tuesday night. "Anyone who stays out of the mud improves their chances of getting my vote."

[Six Things to Look Out for Going Into the Iowa Caucuses]

Still, the Gingrich camp maintains it is giving the pledge more than just lip service. They note an Iowa staffer had to resign after calling Mormonism — Romney's religion — a cult.

And Gingrich argues he has enough cash to run a negative ad war if he wanted to. He notes his campaign made the choice to run positive ads across Iowa beginning Wednesday.

Still, Gingrich might know better than most this election cycle that negative ads work.

He has seen his support slide as the airwaves in Iowa have filled with ads reminding voters of his ethics woes, a public service announcement he shot with Democrat Nancy Pelosi and his lucrative work for Freddie Mac.

[Gingrich and Wife Callista Hit the Campaign Trail]

The libertarian-leaning Paul has assailed Gingrich for "serial hypocrisy," painting him as a career politician who lined his pockets after leaving office by selling access.

In an interview, Romney called him "zany."

How long can Gingrich keep up the positive façade? Asked if he would he would continue the commitment in a general election against Democrat Barack Obama, Gingrich dodged the question.

"Barack Obama's record is so terrible that if you just tell the truth it sounds negative," Gingrich said.

 

Tags:
Iowa caucus,
Ron Paul,
Associated Press,
2012 presidential election,
Republican Party,
Newt Gingrich,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Screw the Communist, Oooops, I mean the Republican party. (Same sh*t) They run on lies, deception, corruptions, greed racist motives and self personal profit. They screwed the country and the economy up, not shifting blame as if were stupid enough to forget. They gave all the jobs away to India and China. Work shady secret deals with the Saudis to raise gas because they own most of the American stock in it. And blocked every effort to stimulate the economy and create jobs because they say it cost too much. It’s OK the spend tax dollars as long as it’s them doing it, and doing it for the wrong reasons. WAKE UP AMERICA. The devil is deceptive. He tells a lie enough times and you begin to believe it. A MESSAGE FROM: Room305(dot)com

Sam of FL 11:08AM January 08, 2012

Who cares that Gingrich "would not endorse Ron Paul if he won the Republican nomination". Ron Paul wouldn't even want to have his good name attached to a lying scumbag like Gingrich, so why is this even news worthy? Gingrich will never win the nomination, he's about 3 weeks away from completely flaming out, and he has already missed the filing deadline in "3" states, most notably Virginia (his home state). So why does the opinion of a lying, cheating, flip-flopping hypocrite (and now a "flake") like Newt Gingrich matter to anyone?

Ron Paul 2012!!

Bob Vondruska of CA 12:14PM December 28, 2011

you know the the great thing about newt gingrich ?somebody help me out,i cann;t think of one.

bruce b of NV 9:26AM December 28, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos