• Comment (2)

GOP Hopefuls Gang Up on Newt Gingrich in Debate

December 16, 2011 RSS Feed Print
Mitt Romney speaks as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich looks on during a Republican presidential debate at the Sioux City Convention Center on Dec. 15, 2011 in Sioux City, Iowa.

Mitt Romney speaks as former House Speaker Newt Gingrich looks on during a Republican presidential debate at the Sioux City Convention Center on Dec. 15, 2011 in Sioux City, Iowa.

SIOUX CITY, Iowa — Republican presidential candidates are plunging into the final weekend of campaigning before the holidays, with Newt Gingrich looking to maintain his lead while Mitt Romney and other rivals work to tear him down.

With the candidates' last debate before the Jan. 3 Iowa caucuses behind them, the campaign will be defined by the sharp contrasts between Romney and Gingrich. Yet, given the unpredictable campaign season, another GOP hopeful's rise remained a possibility.

Romney was still campaigning in western Iowa on Friday as he looked to halt Gingrich's momentum. He planned a campaign swing through South Carolina later in the day. He was also picking up the endorsement of South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, The Associated Press has learned from a Republican with knowledge of the endorsement. The party member disclosed Haley's decision ahead of the official announcement on condition of anonymity.

[See photos of the GOP hopefuls on the campaign trail.]

Gingrich was returning to Washington after clashing sharply with one rival, taking pains to compliment another and saying it was laughable for any of them to challenge his conservative credentials.

In a forceful attack during the nationally televised debate Thursday night, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann said Gingrich "had his hand out and received $1.6 million to influence senior Republicans and keep the scam going in Washington, D.C.," for Freddie Mac, a government-backed housing entity.

"Just not true," Gingrich shot back. "I never lobbied under any circumstances," he added, denying an allegation she had not made.

The clash underscored the state of the race, with Gingrich, the former House speaker, atop the polls in Iowa and nationally and Texas Rep. Ron Paul, Romney and his other pursuers working in television ads and elsewhere to overtake him.

[Can Ron Paul Win It All?]

Former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania, who has staked his campaign on Iowa, was quick to challenge Gingrich as a conservative leader. He recalled that Gingrich had to contend with a "conservative revolution" from the ranks of Republican lawmakers when he was House speaker in the 1990s.

Romney, who runs second in polls in Iowa, largely refrained from criticism of Gingrich, despite increasingly barbed attacks in day-to-day campaigning. Instead, he firmly rejected suggestions that he had once favored gay marriage only to switch his position. "I have been a champion of protecting traditional marriage," he said.

Given the stakes, Gingrich, Bachmann and Santorum weren't the only contenders eager to impress Iowa voters and a nationwide television audience with their conservative grit.

"I hope I am the Tim Tebow of the Iowa caucuses," said Texas Gov. Rick Perry, referring to the Denver Broncos quarterback whose passing ability draws ridicule but who has led his team to a remarkable seven victories in eight weeks.

[Opinion: The Republican Clown Show Rolls On]

"We're getting screwed as Americans," said former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, insisting that he, in fact, was a steadier conservative than any of the others on stage.

"Anybody up here could beat Obama," said Paul, whose views verge on libertarianism and who has struggled to expand his appeal.

Bachmann, who was quicker than any other candidate to criticize a rival, bristled when challenged repeatedly on the accuracy of her facts. "I am a serious candidate for president of the United States, and my facts are accurate," she said.

Indeed, the big question in the opening moments of a fast-paced, two-hour debate went to the heart of a dilemma that could eventually settle the race: Do conservative Republican caucus and primary voters pick a candidate with their hearts, or do they look elsewhere if they judge their favored candidate might not be able to defeat the president?

Those voters begin making that choice on Jan. 3, and if experience is any guide, one or more of the presidential hopefuls on the debate stage will not make it out of Iowa to compete in the New Hampshire primary a week later.

[Read the top 5 candidate gaffes of 2011.]

Gingrich, who seemed an also-ran in the earliest stages of the race, has emerged as a leader heading into the final stretch of the pre-primary campaign. His decades in Washington and his post-congressional career as a consultant have been the subjects of tough critiques from Romney's campaign in the past week.

But the former speaker passed up an offer to criticize his rival on the issue of Medicare, saying, "I'm not in the business of blaming Gov. Romney." In fact, he said, Romney has made constructive suggestions for preserving the program that tens of millions of Americans rely on for health care yet faces deep financial woes.

Gingrich drew criticism earlier in the year for calling a GOP Medicare proposal "right-wing engineering." Romney refrained from criticizing that plan but did not embrace it in full.

Bachmann, who has long-since faded to the back of the pack in the polls, showed no such reluctance.

When he labeled her charges inaccurate, she shot back that when she made similar contentions in the previous debate, she was judged factually accurate by an independent arbiter — a claim that the website Politifact deemed inaccurate. She said Gingrich's work for Freddie Mac was in furtherance of a "grandiose scam" to keep alive an entity at the heart of the housing crisis.

[See political cartoons on the 2012 candidates.]

"I will state unequivocally for every person watching tonight: I have never once changed my positions because of any payment," Gingrich said, adding that, in fact, he favored breaking up both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, his benefactor.

Moments later, Bachmann challenged Paul even more aggressively, saying his refusal to consider pre-emptive action to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon was dangerous.

Tags:
Associated Press,
2012 presidential election,
Newt Gingrich,
Mitt Romney,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

For those who are pro-peace, there is an important fund raising event for Dr. Ron Paul, today, Friday, Dec.16 in honor of the original Boston Tea Party. Please consider a donation towards peace, prosperity, and a strong national economy. Donate to the moneybomb at RonPaul2012.com

In Liberty,

Entrepreneur and Job Creator

1entrepreneur1 of VA 5:46PM December 16, 2011

It is evident that many Republicans are being manipulated to protect the wealthiest among us from additional minimal taxation to extend the present tax cut. In spite of their recent passage of a bill that funds the tax extension of the pipeline they are still trying to protect the wealthy by calling them job creators. Are these folks truly employment creators and if so where are the jobs being hidden from the unemployed?

We must as Americans become a collective team. We are willing as a nation to get involved in shared sacrifice. World War II has now become a memory for all citizens but its ethos hearkens back to dedicated people willing to work long hours, sacrifice personal wants, and live by a stringent ration book. Our families did without for the troops, often bought war bonds and lived by a new partnership with a responsive government.

Stuart Symington, the Senator from Missouri is perhaps best described by the columnist Robert Novak of the Wall Street Journal in the late 1950’s when he observed that his campaign had a somnambulistic air about it. Many people felt that Symington’s campaign could be distinguished from the other campaigns by his lack of a demon driving him irrationally toward the Presidency at all costs. Senator Symington gave the impression that life would go on for him much as it had before even if he failed to achieve the office.

Symington held to a fundamental concept of government that comprised a large portion of his definition of the American dream. He strongly believed in the concept of government being a partner of business, labor, and even farmers. A partner with government and the details that idea contained was his mantra. He took issue with those Republicans that called for the exclusion of basic partnership fundamentals from the prose of politics as being dangerous.

Symington felt that if you flew to any destination you wanted to make certain you got to your airport safely, therefore you needed the FAA as a partner. You buy stock in any company you want to make certain that corporation exists so the partnership with the SEC is crucial. You purchase a container of tablets in the drug store you want to feel that what is bottled are the capsules you desire, hence the partnership with the Food and Drug Administration. Listening to 91.5, you don’t want to find seven garbled stations; you need the FCC as a partner.

Symington had concluded and advocated that America had become strong because government served as the partner of everybody and we had to realize that strength was our only hope. A new road bridge, new school, and a good teacher were all great strengths in the aging eyes of this Missouri Senator. He felt government-business partnerships made the nation and the realization of its dream, great.

Today most Republicans are divided on this partnership aspect of the federal government.

Alan Phillips

Bloomington, IL

Alan G Phillips of IL 9:52AM December 16, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos