• Comment (4)

Men Continue To Fare Badly in This Economy

The population of "disadvantaged men" is growing. Here's why everyone--women included--should care.

December 5, 2011 RSS Feed Print

 Broadly speaking, men have historically had the upper hand in the U.S. economy: they earn more money than their female counterparts, they are less likely to fall down the economic ladder than women, and a study released earlier this year from the Pew Research Center also showed men to be bouncing back from the "mancession" better than women.

However, a host of studies show a growing group of "disadvantaged men" who are underemployed, undereducated, and highly incarcerated—a phenomenon that predates the recent recession. Incarceration rates for men have skyrocketed since the 1980s. And a recent study published by the American Academy of Political and Social Science found that few teenage and young adult males benefited from the economic recovery of 2003 to 2007, and that men under 30 were the most adversely affected of any demographic group by the Great Recession.

[The U.S. economy added 120,000 jobs last month. What does that mean?]

Even as many women continue to fight for equal pay and to shatter the glass ceiling, here are four reasons why even those without Y chromosomes should care about the plight of disadvantaged men in the United States.

America Has a Racial Economic Gap

To talk about "disadvantaged men" is to talk about racial disparities in America. White, non-Hispanic males account for about 78percent of all men over 25 in the U.S., and 82 percent of men over 25 with a bachelor's degree or higher are white. However, less than one-third of prisoners are white men. Likewise, while the employment-to-population ratio has been declining for men across the board, it has not done so equally across racial and ethnic groups. For example, 66 percent of white men 16 and older are employed, compared to 53 percent for black men. According to Ron Haskins, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, that rate for young black men is particularly low, at about 50 percent. "When you have any population that has half of them unemployed, that's just beyond the pale," he says.

The United States Has a Culture of Incarceration

The United States jails 702 people per 100,000 (and a vast majority of those prisoners are men). This is 12 percent higher than Russia, and it is more than five times the incarceration rate of England and Wales, Spain, Canada, Australia, or Italy. "We are arresting far too many young men. ... And this is an area where we can save money," said Irwin Garfinkel, co-director of Columbia University's Population Research Center, at a discussion at the Brookings Institution on Monday. Reducing the amount that the country spends on imprisoning over 2 million people could save money for governments already strapped for cash and cutting jobs—cuts that have affected women and men alike during the economic recovery.

The Decline in Manufacturing and Construction Has Hurt Men Most

One reason why men suffered so greatly during the recent recession was the decline in jobs in the manufacturing and construction industries, both of which are dominated by male workers. As the depressed housing market is arguably the key weight holding down the U.S. economy right now, finding ways to get all of those unemployed construction workers—and the factory workers making building equipment, vehicles, and tools—back to work is going to be key to making for a more robust recovery for everyone.

[See what could happen if the U.S. ended the Fed.]

Families Suffer When Men Suffer Economically

The problems faced by disadvantaged men makes for hardship for many women and children nationwide. According to Garfinkel, a father's incarceration reduces his contributions to his family by $1,300, or 25 percent, per year. It also doubles his odds of homelessness, making it more difficult to support his family when he is freed from prison. And new Census data suggests that a family with no father present must work harder just to stay afloat; in a family with children under 15 in which the mother is widowed, separated, or divorced and makes childcare payments, 11.7 percent of the family's monthly income is spent on child care, compared to 7.0 percent in families in which the mother is married.

Tags:
recession,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Re: "as many women continue to fight for equal pay..."

No legislation to date has closed the gender wage gap. That's because pay-equity advocates continue to overlook the effects of female AND male behavior:

Despite the 40-year-old demand for women's equal pay, millions of wives still choose to have no pay at all. In fact, according to Dr. Scott Haltzman, author of "The Secrets of Happily Married Women," stay-at-home wives, including the childless who represent an estimated 10 percent, constitute a growing niche. "In the past few years,” he says in a CNN report at http://tinyurl.com/6reowj, “many women who are well educated and trained for career tracks have decided instead to stay at home.” (“Census Bureau data show that 5.6 million mothers stayed home with their children in 2005, about 1.2 million more than did so a decade earlier....” at http://tinyurl.com/qqkaka. If indeed more women are staying at home, perhaps it's because feminists and the media have told women for years that female workers are paid less than men in the same jobs — so why bother working if they're going to be penalized and humiliated for being a woman. If "greedy, profit-obsessed" employers could get away with paying women less than men for the same work, they would not hire a man – ever.)

As full-time mothers or homemakers, stay-at-home wives earn zero. How can they afford to do this while in many cases living in luxury? Because they're supported by their husband, an “employer” who pays them to stay at home.

Feminists, government, and the media ignore what this obviously implies: If millions of wives are able to accept no wages and live as well as their husbands, millions of other wives are able to accept low wages, refuse overtime and promotions, work part-time instead of full-time (“According to a 2009 UK study for the Centre for Policy Studies, only 12 percent of the 4,690 women surveyed wanted to work full time”: http://bit.ly/ihc0tl See also an Australian report: http://tinyurl.com/862kzes), take more unpaid days off, avoid uncomfortable wage-bargaining (http://tinyurl.com/45ecy7p) — all of which lower women's average pay. Women are able to make these choices because they are supported or anticipate being supported by a husband who must earn more than if he'd chosen never to marry. (Still, even many men who shun marriage, unlike their female counterparts, feel their self worth is tied to their net worth.) This is how MEN help create the wage gap. If the roles were reversed so that men raised the children and women raised the income, men would average lower pay than women.

See “An In-depth Look at the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act” at http://tinyurl.com/pvbrcu

As for black men, here's one reason they are lagging:

"Why Workplace Affirmative Action is Failing Blacks" at http://battlinbog.blog-city.com/why_affirmative_action_is_failing_blacks.htm

Male Matters of MI 3:42PM December 07, 2011

@DSPWilson I wouldnt say that she only cares about the impact it has on her. I think her point is that it affects everyone and needs to be addressed for everyone's benefit. I think she is more concerned with promoting urgency of the situation so that people realize they need to take care of it.

As for getting back manufacturing jobs, that's hardly a simple fix. Those companies aren't going to bring those jobs back from India and pay 10 times more per hour just to be nice. They are trying to save money and need to keep costs low to appease the "I need cheap junk" mentality Americans demand. Let's be real, most of those jobs are gone forever. We need to get these men into new industries where they have a chance of getting hired. Don't ask me for any answers on that one though. I can only recognize the problem and the limitations of the solution. coming up with a real solution is a different matter entirely.

Kale of CA 2:28AM December 06, 2011

The author has some very corrupt values represented in her article. We care about people's suffering because it is the essence of living a moral life that we care for others, not because other's suffering might cause some negative consequence for ourselves.

dspwilson of WA 11:44PM December 05, 2011

Photo Galleries

Storms, Wildfires Tear Across U.S.

Heavy rain, high winds and fire continue to plague regions throughout the country.

advertisement

Latest Videos