• Comment (13)

Politicians 'Insulted' by Foreign Aid to China

Though it affects only a tiny part of the budget, it's a politically popular argument

November 15, 2011 RSS Feed Print

House lawmakers on Tuesday turned anti-Chinese sentiments against the federal agency responsible for allocating $4 million in U.S. funds for environmental initiatives in China, the largest foreign holder of U.S. debt.

Despite the relatively small amount of money going to China in aid this year, Republicans and Democrats bashed the programs during a hearing before the House Foreign Affairs Committee's Asia and Pacific panel, calling them a "giant mistake of thinking" by the State Department and "an insult" to taxpayers in America.

State's foreign aid programs have been in the crosshairs recently among lawmakers and presidential hopefuls, especially given the nation's $14 trillion government debt. Republican frontrunner former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has been targeting China in particular as an example of misguided taxpayer funding.

"This galls me: We give 10 million dollars in foreign aid a year to China," Romney said during a speech earlier this month. "Its not that they're bad people, but the idea that a nation that is as large and robust and economically viable as theirs is getting money from us just makes no sense at all." [Read how foreign policy is a matter of rhetoric versus reality in presidential campaigns.]

The nearly $4 million in aid discussed on Tuesday—which is part of the $12 million in overall aid given to China this fiscal year—is a small percentage of the country's total foreign assistance budget, and is even less significant compared to the spending cuts being negotiated by members of Congress's so-called "supercommittee" this week.

But the political rancor is more theater than frugality.

"The idea that we would give foreign aid to China is an insult to the American taxpayer," said California Democrat Rep. Brad Sherman. "I don't worry so much about the $3.95 million. I worry about the mindset in our foreign policy establishment that thinks sending checks to Beijing is a good idea."

Nisha Desai Biswal, the assistant administrator for Asia at the United States Agency for International Development, offered a spirited defense of the China aid before skeptical lawmakers, claiming the $125 million in aid over the past decade fundamentally advances America's own interests in the country.

According to Biswal, USAID does not give money directly to the Chinese government. Instead, the money is used to fund public advocacy initiatives in China to raise awareness about issues such as climate change and the illegal trafficking of endangered species.

She said that as much as a third of particulate pollution in California is due to coal-fired power plants in China, so the financial incentives are geared toward encouraging the Chinese to cut back on their environmentally harmful or illegal practices for the sake of Americans' health and economy. [Read how problems in the U.S. economy have put China in the political crosshairs.]

Lawmakers pointed out that there's no easy way to measure the success of the USAID programs, especially given the lack of regulation and enforcement regarding the environment and in other areas of the Chinese economy.

"If the [People's Republic of China] lacks the political will to clean up its own backyard, no amount of U.S. funds will change that reality," said Illinois Republican Rep. Don Manzullo.

Manzullo, in particular, pointed out that a media campaign recently sponsored by USAID in China was titled "Sex, Drugs, Rock and Roll, and Wildlife."

"What does sex got to do with stopping the illegal trafficking of animals, of endangered species?" he asked.

Biswal defended the campaign, saying that while it may have been "glib and ill-advised," it sought to make the correlation between the illegal trafficking of animals and the illegal trafficking of drugs and people that occurs through China's borders.

"The U.S. taxpayer pays for this because these programs address our core interests," she said. "We believe that this is an appropriate use of U.S. tax funds."

Tags:
foreign aid,
USAID,
China,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Perhaps it would be better understood if we did not label it "foreign aid". China would probably not accept the funds if they were labeled "Propaganda Funds." Perhaps a new terminology can be applied that will go down easier with both US citizens and the Chinese.

Just thinking of FL 5:08PM April 22, 2013

If there is a genuine problem in china I would hope we would Aid them and vice versa. I don't want a war with china and I think most americans wouldn't want one either. Stop bashing china, it's our fault we have a debt with them and maybe one day when this nonsense is resolved we'll be glad to have their support. Something might happen to earth and when that happens (it's probably already happening) we need all the help we can get.

Justin of CT 4:11PM December 12, 2012

We borrowed money from China to fund our war machine. Seems like we owe them that 4 million. To call it foreign aid is laughable. It's payment on a debt that we never should have incurred in the first place. And quite frankly these companies could care less if you can afford to buy their products. Once we can't afford to buy their products, they'll just market them in other countries. Quite frankly I'm tired of politicians talking about what "insults" us, what "we won't stand for", and what "we think". They could care less and unless they actually ask me what insults me, what I won't stand for, and what I think, they need to shut the hell up.

Metal Goddess of TX 10:58PM June 10, 2012

Photo Galleries

Women on Death Row

Only 12 women have been executed on death row in the U.S. since 1976.

advertisement

Latest Videos