• Comment (4)

CBO: Unemployment Benefits Extension an Economic Booster

Business tax cuts, meanwhile, provide little short-term stimulus

November 15, 2011 RSS Feed Print

New estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office suggest that increasing aid to the unemployed could be the best policy for near-term job creation in the United States. Tax breaks for businesses and infrastructure spending, meanwhile, are not likely to boost short-term growth.

According to estimates released today by the CBO, increased unemployment aid could, over the course of 2012 and 2013, add 0.4 to 1.9 dollars to the GDP per dollar spent, by far the largest increase for any of the options studied by the CBO. Reducing employers' payroll taxes could add up to 1.3 dollars. The effect for reducing business' income taxes, meanwhile, is 0.3 dollars at most. For infrastructure spending, it's 0.7 dollars.

[Read about why the world's biggest economies are headed for a slowdown.]

The new estimates come as the country simultaneously faces an economic crisis and a deficit crisis. GDP growth was at a sluggish 2.5 percent in the third quarter, and the unemployment rate has been stuck at or above 9 percent for seven months. Meanwhile, the so-called congressional super committee is scrambling to determine a way to cut $1.4 trillion from the deficit before its November 23 deadline.

The difficulty of this situation was highlighted at a Senate Budget Committee hearing today, when CBO Director Doug Elmendorf told senators that the short-term spending increases and tax cuts are likely the best paths to growing the economy, as long as they are offset by medium- and long-term adjustments to government spending.

"Under current policies, U.S. fiscal policy is on an unsustainable path," said Elmendorf.

When Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad of North Dakota asked how increased spending now can ultimately benefit the economy, in light of current ballooning deficits and debt, Elmendorf responded that it will be crucial for the country to balance short- and long-run economic needs.

"It's not really a paradox," Elmendorf told the committee, later explaining, "In the short term, most economists agree the constraint on our output and incomes today...is principally weak demand for goods and services."

Increasing that demand, therefore, is the key to growth, says Elmendorf: "In the short term, what can strengthen the economy is cuts in taxes or increases in spending."

[See analysis of the latest U.S. jobs report.]

That boost to demand may have to come soon; unemployment benefits are set to expire at the end of the year. As The Hill reports, lawmakers are currently fighting over the process of passing an unemployment benefits extension.

Elmendorf acknowledged that some policies are more effective over the long term than the short term, with infrastructure as one key example. Conrad emphasized the importance of infrastructure in his home state, where he says a booming oil industry requires better transportation routes.

"We need to build roads. That could employ thousands of people," said Conrad.

Elmendorf agreed that infrastructure does not create significant jobs in the short term simply because of the sometimes lengthy processes involved in identifying and approving projects, but said that in the longer term the effects can be larger.

Congress members seem to agree that economic growth is priority one in the United States. Agreeing on how to achieve that is a major roadblock, and it is one for which the CBO has little guidance.

When Delaware Democratic Sen. Chris Coons asked Elmendorf to list the three best economic growth policies that could also attain bipartisan support, Elmendorf demurred. "Senator, I'm about the 10,000th most politically knowledgeable person within five miles of this building. So I'm not the person you'd want to ask about what's politically viable." He added, "All we can do is to offer our analysis of what we think is more or less effective."

Tags:
employment,
economy,
unemployment,
economic stimulus

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

All Bull crap!!! what happen too tier 5??????? those are the 99ers

Marie Perez of FL 4:05PM January 13, 2012

Digging a deeper hole is considered a benefit ?

lol, you guys should be in charge....oh wait, you are.

I am not saying these people don't need money. It should be provided.

Because in the end, the government was ultimately responsible for keeping jobs on these shore for the people all government employees have taken an oath to do so for by whatever mechinism they saw fit.

After all they are the law makers.

And they had no problem dishing money out to thier, and by default and treason, our corporate overlords. The bottom line being, we told them no, and they (bailout boys)took the money anyhow.

In the ghetto this would be considered getting jacked. And "Law Enforcement" would be involved in a meaningful way.

But as we see today across america "Law Enforcement" has thier backs to the criminals who are in plain sight, using riot gear to disperse peaceful protesters. The very people they themselves have taken an oath to "serve and protect", and actually PAY THEM to do so.

What we must now admit to ourselves is, that the very people who come begging US for our money, votes and jobs while lying to our faces must be held criminally responsible for thier actions or inactions.

Yes I am speaking of Politicians. None of US have ever asked them to do the job they come begging US for.

If you at your work couldn't actually fix or produce something, how long would you last ?

If you do something that creates financial hardship on another do you expect not to be held legally responsible ?

If you refuse to help someone in trouble, even by a phone call to authorities, you are held responsible criminally.

All "normal" People are held to this standard.

And from what I understand Corporations and Politicians are "People" too, at least that what the "supreme court" has croaked, although I have my suspicions about all of them in this regard due again to their actions or inactions.

I see "people" professing thier distress at how success is being punished. A success only garnered thru and by the subversion of our "Executive", "Legislative" & "Judicial" branches of our Government. As well as the spineless creatures of the "fourth estate".

I am still not ashamed to be an American, although I am ashamed of many things we do as a people and a nation. I am however ashamed of many who share the same distinction yet claim to represent US.

For they were never trully Americans.

The standard shall be thiers...Your either with US or against US.

Kish of AL 9:57AM November 16, 2011

That' what High Speed Universities is all about, to further the education of students. They need more than a high school degree today, they need at least 2 years of college, preferrably 4, and then we're going to work with communities so they can grow economically and create more jobs for our young people

cececiliagault of CA 2:42AM November 16, 2011

Photo Galleries

Storms, Wildfires Tear Across U.S.

Heavy rain, high winds and fire continue to plague regions throughout the country.

advertisement

Latest Videos