• Comment (43)

Why Ron Paul's Foreign Policy Makes Sense (or Not)

Foreign policy experts share why of some tenets of the 2012 candidate's ideas make sense, and why they don't

November 9, 2011 RSS Feed Print

TAKE TWO: Ron Paul and others with so-called "isolationist" tendencies don't want the United States to do much in the world, Fly explains. "They want us to hide behind the oceans, I guess, and defend ourselves here," he says. "But I think as we've seen from September 11 and other incidents, that's just not possible in this day and age in a very globalized world."

[Ron Paul's $1 trillion spending-cut plan targets five cabinet departments.]

Paul: Be nice to Iran, don't sanction them.

TAKE ONE: Diplomacy doesn't mean countries must be friends, Preble explains. "We had diplomacy with the Soviet Union when we were fighting the common enemy of Nazi Germany, for example," Preble says. "True diplomacy is being able to relate to countries with whom we might disagree." And in Iran, according to Preble, the sanctions haven't worked anyway. "The object of U.S. policy since 1979, which is no diplomatic or economic relations," was to change the regime itself or alter the existing regime's behavior, Preble says. "And neither has occurred."

TAKE TWO: Iran supports terrorism and is working to become a regional power with a nuclear weapon, says Fly, and sanctions are "one of the few tools short of military action we can pursue." It is not in U.S. interests for Iran to procure nuclear weapons, Fly explains, adding that if they did, the balance of power in the Middle East would shift, and more countries would seek such weapons. "It's not the sort of thing where if we suddenly withdraw the sanctions, Iran is going to say that the Americans are nicer people than we thought, so we'll stop all of our illicit activities," Fly says.

Tags:
Ron Paul,
2012 presidential election,
foreign policy

Reader Comments Read all comments (43)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You probably owe it to your viewers in the interest of journalistic integrity to disclose that FPI is the creation of William Kristol, THE head neo-con and leader of the Israel Lobby in America. In fact, I believe it was created from the ashes of that disastrous neo-con group, PNAC, also a Kristol front. These people are DANGEROUS and do not care about OUR country, only theirs. They find the Jamie Fly's and the John Bolton's to simply be useful idiots.

Fed Up of TX 8:02PM January 04, 2012

Ron Paul Is the only one that has it right,

dan mccoy of AR 9:57AM December 04, 2011

I agree with Preble as well as Ron Paul. Mr. Fly's argument assumes the worse. As an American, I want to know what the next President is going to do for America. Being the cops of the world is not going to cut it. It's not only expensive as hell, but wrong to boot. Bring our troops home and let's sharpen our own tools before trying to impose our way of life on everybody else. They don't want it.

martin kirschner of NY 4:03PM November 29, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos