• Comment (58)

Romney Goes After Federal Employees in Fiscal Plan

He wants to put public salaries on par with the private sector and cut the federal workforce

November 4, 2011 RSS Feed Print

During a speech in Washington on Friday, GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney argued that federal employees are making too much compared to their private-sector counterparts, and as president he'd work to even the score.

[Read: 10 Jobs Created by Presidential Campaigns.]

"Public servants shouldn't get a better deal than the taxpayers they work for," he said Friday at an event organized by Americans for Prosperity, a conservative political group.

His proposal to align federal and private-sector compensation, which he says could save as much as $47 billion in taxpayer money a year, comes as part of a broad fiscal policy plan that includes as much as $500 billion per year in spending cuts, a spending cap at 20 percent of GDP, and significant changes to national entitlement programs like Medicare.

Romney's campaign, citing a Heritage Foundation study from 2010, notes that federal employees make as much as 30 to 40 percent more than comparable workers in the private sector. According to Romney, since President Obama became president the number of federal employees making more than $150,000 annually has more than doubled. [See our photo gallery of Republicans on the campaign trail.]

"The American people are increasingly working to support the government," he said during his speech Friday. "It ought to be the other way around."

Romney got applause from the conservative crowd when he called for cuts to not only the salaries, but also the size of the federal workforce. He repeated a proposal—which he included in the jobs plan he rolled out earlier this year—that calls for a 10 percent cut to the federal workforce through a "1-for-2 system of attrition." In other words, for every two people that leave the federal government, only one person will be hired to replace them.

According to his jobs plan, this would give him the flexibility, as president, "to allocate the new hiring to those areas where additional resources could be put to most effective use."

[Check out our collection of political cartoons on the 2012 presidential field.]

Unions that represent federal workers have long dismissed the claim that public employees make more than similar professionals in the private sector. The National Federation of Federal Employees, for example, is drawing attention to an analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data presented Friday which claimed that federal employees are paid nearly 27 percent less than those with comparable private sector jobs.

"Candidates' proposals to slash federal pay are being offered in the guise of federal deficit reduction, but in reality they are politically driven," says William R. Dougan, president of the National Federation of Federal Employees. "The truth is that Republicans campaigning for office see a political opportunity in painting the federal workforce as a symbol of big government, and they have exploited it to the fullest."

Tags:
2012 presidential election,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (58)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

My former job; before the one I have now, I was a federal employee. I worked for the DoD. The job was a dead end-no chance of ever being promoted. Before the job was staffed with federal employees, it was staffed with private sector. The DoD made a decision that some fiscal cuts were in order. So the private sector workers in that specific department were all terminated. The lowest paid private sector employee was earning $26/hour. Once the job became federalized, the starting pay went to $14.31 per hour...with no chance of ever being promoted. They didn't hire enough people to fully staff the job, so overtime was mandatory. Many of us were working 50-60 and sometimes even 70 hours per week. Similar jobs in the private sector were paying (in that area) anywhere from $12 to as much as $31 per hour. Some had benefits, some did not. I did a study for a job I had many years ago when I first left the military. The topic was a cost saving analysis on government contracting versus federalizing the workforce. The evidence was overwhelming that government saves a LOT of money when it federalizes. Contractors make a significant amount more than their federal counterparts. Don't trust the word of Obama or Romney or me or anyone else. Do some research. The numbers are out there and they are available to anyone who looks into them. Regardless of who you like as POTUS, federal workers by and large do not earn more than their counterparts in the private sector.

Some other interesting things about federal workers

-Most have either decades of experience, typically gained through military service, or college degrees, or both

-Many federal agencies have a policy that in order to promote, one must continuously improve. In other words, if you want to climb the ladder, you have to take classes in your field. Many agencies even begin the process of pushing people out who are becoming too stagnant. This flies in the face of the suggestion that federal workers are lazy, ignorant, etc.

-Many people in the private sector begrudge federal workers for getting things such as cost of living increases but no one begrudges the military, who get the same increases.

As with all facets of life, there are some deadbeats in the federal service. There are some leeches and some undeseirables. But that's a fact of life in every manner of speaking.

My political affiliation tends to fall in the middle on many issues but I think it is clear that many on the right are looking for a "bogeyman" to point to as being the problem. Many are pointing to federal workers and the fact is, it is unwarranted and undeserved.

And yes, I am a current federal worker. I also have a M.S. degree, am an honorably discharged military veteran, have taken over 20 courses independently that are in the field that I work in, and am preparing to begin work on a M.A. degree int he field that I work in.

MW of MD 8:17AM August 14, 2012

I too work for the federal government in the Treasury Department. My colleagues in my division are either attorneys or CPAs with graduate degrees. We work with the most complex and high-dollar issues on the field of federal taxation. I can assure you that the CPAs and attorneys from the prestigious firms we deal with on a daily basis are earning at least 50% to 100% more than we do. It is preposterous to call us overpaid. Let Willard (Mitt's real name) try to get someone to work these tax issues for lower pay and I can guarantee you that the large corporations will trample over the tax system. Best of luck, Willard - er, Mitt.

"FED" UP of MA 8:46AM June 14, 2012

Romney and the Heritage Foundation are lying. The Heritage foundation added a dollar amount into their calculations of federal pay for so-called "job security". Secondly, all of the surveys show that comparable jobs in the private sector are paid MORE than Federal jobs. Thirdly, the Federal workforce no longer includes janitors (paid via lease rentals), clerks, or other unskilled jobs of that nature. 97% of Federal jobs are professional and require a college degree, and the majority of Federal workers have decades of experience. Also, Federal job benefits should be compared to Fortune 500 companies, not Mom-and-Pop small businesses. The CATO institute cited a figure of $126K as an average salary, while the Bureau of Labor Statistics tells us it is around $73K. Even adding in the value of benefits gets the full amount NO WHERE NEAR what the erroneous figures these biased "think" tanks are spouting.

Anne Hullinger of SD 6:20PM November 17, 2011

Photo Galleries

Women on Death Row

Only 12 women have been executed on death row in the U.S. since 1976.

advertisement

Latest Videos