• Comment (1)

Uncertain Over Deficit Reduction, Treasury Drops Plans to Shrink Bond Auctions

Treasury says it will continue to gradually increase the average maturity of its debt portfolio

November 2, 2011 RSS Feed Print

WASHINGTON (Reuters) — The Treasury on Wednesday dropped plans to gradually shrink the size of its bond and note auctions because of uncertainty over fiscal stimulus legislation and deficit reduction moves by a congressional panel.

The Treasury announced a $72 billion quarterly refunding of its 3-year, 10-year and 30-year debt securities, which will raise $48.1 billion in new cash, and said it would take a wait- and-see approach to the fiscal outlook.

"Given the current range of potential fiscal policy outcomes, Treasury believes that it is prudent to hold offering sizes for notes and bonds stable over the near term," Treasury Assistant Secretary Mary Miller said in a statement.

Miller had announced in August that Treasury expected to gradually decrease offering amounts for bonds and notes following a resolution of a debt ceiling impasse in Congress that brought the United States to the brink of default.

President Barack Obama is seeking to persuade lawmakers to approve individual job-creating measures, initially proposed as a $447 billion tax-cut and spending package that was stalled by Senate Republicans. It was to provide short-term stimulus to the economy while a medium-term plan to cut deficits was developed.

[Check out a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

In documents made available on Wednesday, the Treasury's borrowing advisory committee indicated skepticism about the ability of a congressional "super committee" to bring U.S. deficits under control.

The 12-member bipartisan panel is considering a range of plans that would slash deficits by as much as $3 trillion over 10 years, but Democrats and Republicans are still deeply divided over what mix of spending cuts and revenue increases are needed. It has until November 23 to produce recommendations.

"The progress of these deliberations is uncertain and market participants do not have high expectations for the outcome," said a report by the advisers, who are from top Wall Street firms.

The uncertainty was reflected in dealers' estimates of future borrowing needs, which range widely from $950 billion to $2.45 trillion in fiscal 2012 and $800 billion to $2.25 trillion for fiscal 2013.

The dealers also had much more pessimistic deficit forecasts than either the White House of nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. For fiscal 2014, the dealers forecast a deficit of $812 billion, compared with a $380 billion CBO projection and $476 billion from the White House budget office.

The Treasury said it would continue to gradually increase gross issuance of inflation-indexed notes, known as TIPS, but it did not specify an amount, saying it needed further feedback from market participants.

[See a slide show of 5 bright spots in the U.S. economy.]

It said it would continue to gradually increase the average maturity of its debt portfolio, which currently stands just over 62 months. Although it did not specify a target, minutes of the Treasury borrowing advisory committee cited a hypothetical example in which the maturity would rise to 70 months by increasing bond and note issuance on a pro-rata basis while keeping bills constant.

The department also said it would continue to study two potential changes -- introduction of its first-ever floating-rate debt security and allowing bids for bill auctions to fall into negative territory.

Treasury Deputy Assistant Secretary Matt Rutherford noted in the borrowing committee minutes that the floating rate notes "have many features that make them a potentially attractive instrument for Treasury, there still a lot of work that needs to be done on the product related to cost, structure and demand."

Tags:
bonds,
Treasury Department

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Why are we looking for a solution from the same group of criminal idiots that created the problem in the first place? This collapse is not from stupidity, it's from criminality. The first step in any recovery, if one is even possible, is to not delegate the task of solving the problem to those who caused it. If you think it was the other party's fault, your a scathing idiot. It's always the other party's fault. That should tell you that 'parties' aren't good for our welfare. They weren't described in the Constitution because they have no place in our government. Two parties dominating our election process is prima facie proof of corruption of our right to free choice in the election of our representatives. If our representatives represented all of the Citizens of their respective states without regard for party affiliation, wealth, race, or other factors, then why do they so often vote along party lines on issues that have relatively clear cut solutions. They do so to satisfy their greatest priority, the preservation of their political party and thus, the preservation of their own well-being. They no more represent the People of their respective states than Obama represents the poor. All are working for an increasingly more elite group of extremely wealthy individuals intent upon controlling our country and/or the entire globe.

Twenty-four percent of income and thirty-four percent of assets flow/are held by 1% of the population according to some experts. Regardless of whether these are very accurate numbers, it's obvious that the wealth distribution in this country is so grossly skewed that equality has become nothing more than a word that politicians can throw around to sound good while they make the situation worse with further laws designed to benefit the wealthiest. We are losing this country to those that compete with avarice for nothing less than every cookie in the jar and regardless of how many people they kill in the process. The Constitution, humanity, decency, fair play, fair allocation of assets and resources, and other topics of ethical concern to those who try and preserve our community are of no concern to them. They win by taking all in a country whose principles largely dictate the exact opposite. Reconciling competition against human rights and inheritance against redistribution of capital is complicated but not impossible. Every time more flows into the hands of those who least need it, the atrocities become more glaring. There is nothing wrong with coveting wealth during your lifetime and for your benefit and everything wrong with rigging the game so that your descendants may someday come into possession of so much unearned wealth that they can corner the market on life itself for everyone else.

We have projected our integrity onto our representatives and are now disappointed. We must fire them and alter course. We must not ask them for direction. If we don't know our way, how in the world could they?

edwould of OK 4:44PM November 25, 2011

Photo Galleries

Storms, Wildfires Tear Across U.S.

Heavy rain, high winds and fire continue to plague regions throughout the country.

advertisement

Latest Videos