• Comment (2)

Qadhafi's Death Won't Mean End for U.S. Role in Libya

Reports say Qadhafi's dead, but the U.S. still has a role to play in Libya

October 20, 2011 RSS Feed Print

The United States has been entrenched in Libya since March 19, when the first airstrikes against Col. Muammar Qadhafi's regime began. But seven months later, even with reports of Qadhafi's death, America's work there is not complete. [Read: 7 Challenges for a Post-Qadhafi Libya.]

This morning, as U.S. officials awaited confirmation of Qadhafi's death, Libyans celebrated the news in the streets of Tripoli and Benghazi. According to Reuters, the Transitional National Council, Libya's interim leaders, claimed Qadhafi died due to injuries sustained during NATO airstrikes on his convoy. Reports suggest he may also have been shot. Just before, according to reports from Libya, TNC fighters took control of Sirte, considered the last major holdout of pro-Qadhafi forces.

The news comes just days after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited with Libyan Prime Minister Mahmoud Jibril in Tripoli to promise America's commitment to the Libyan people. According to Clinton, the international coalition will continue to protect civilians "until the threat from Qadhafi and those who hang to the past is ended." While that day may now be here, the United States also has a role to play to support what's likely to be a long and difficult democratic transition. [Read: Rebel victory in Libya is a vindication for Obama.]

Already, Clinton said in Tripoli, the administration is working to unlock billions of dollars in the previous regime's frozen assets to help with Libya's recovery. The administration, she said, would also provide $40 million to help Libya "secure and destroy dangerous stockpiles of weapons." In addition, the United States will engage in educational and cultural exchanges with Libyans to encourage economic cooperation between the two nations and to help Libya integrate into world markets. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the Middle East uprisings.]

Since the start of the Libyan revolution, President Obama and his administration have been careful to remain on the periphery, making sure that the victory remains in the hands of Libyans themselves. So, apart from economic cooperation and foreign aid, the United States may also have a guiding role to play as the country plans its path toward becoming a democratic nation. "The United States knows something about revolution and liberty. That is how our nation was born more than 230 years ago," Clinton told the Libyans. "And we know that democracy takes time; it will not be easy or quick. But we are filled with admiration for what you have already accomplished and confident in your ability to move forward."

Tags:
Muammar Qadhafi,
Libya,
military

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

We're going to unlock billions of dollars for the new Libyan government. Then, we're going to hand them $40 million to secure weapons -- because, you know, it's unrealistic that these folks would otherwise allocate any of the newly acquired billions to do the one thing that any government has to do to remain in power.

I think I've figured out why we are so inclined towards budget deficits, and why there's so much backing for Tea Party politics even though the social agenda of the GOP is much less admired.

Jamie of VA 3:57PM October 20, 2011

Strong man dead? No man is too strong that he cannot live in fear of others; and no man is too weak that he cannot constitute a danger to others. These are the words of famous American jurist Roscoe Pound. Dictators everywhere beware!

And about the role Republicans played in this. first I point out that this is ANOTHER BIG FOREING POLICY WIN BY PRESIDENT OBAMA.

Clueless Republicans want to abolish the United Nations and stop all foreign aid. When they fight foreign wars, they do so expensively and with the wrong strategy. Just think of the difference between Iraq and Libya: $1 trillion in Iraq to topple Saddam and ten years; $1 billion in Libya and six months. Bush and his wars drove us into recession and near economic collapse!

Dr. Sam of CA 11:16AM October 20, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos