Jobs Issue Plays Into Defense Cuts Argument

Cuts in defense spending could affect the economy as well

August 8, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

Politically, by using the jobs argument, hawks on the right could very well get some Democrats, who are concerned with getting unemployment under control before the 2012 election, to ally with them in defense of Pentagon spending. Or, at the least, it could be a strong political attack against anyone, from either party, who is adamant about cutting national security funds.

Either way, the Pentagon has some tough decisions ahead as it cuts back its spending, and depending on the actions of Congress, they could get tougher.

Tags:
national security terrorism and the military,
Leon Panetta,
Department of Defense,
employment,
defense spending,
Mike Mullen,
deficit and national debt,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

agree completely with the rest of the comments. unnecessary "defense" spending is the worse form of socialism. completely wasteful, unproductive, malignant...

Imagine what all those billions could do if poured into infrastructure spending in terms of jobs and quality of life? roads, bridges, ports, high-speed rail, airports...

our military is make us poor and weak.

roy of FL 4:41AM August 09, 2011

Propaganda much? Who cares about the DoD or the people in it? That is welfare. If we are looking at dollars and cents, which is how everybody else in America is being treated right now, it is this simple: they provide a service we do not need, so we should not keep paying them for it. And as for cutting spending, that is really pretty simple: end the wars, cut the bills, hire domestic employees that contribute to something meaningful rather than American imperialism. The jobs lost by defense contractors are the chief issue here, and why is the government subsidizing people who make a living by killing anybody who has enemies wealthy enough to buy their products? If those jobs are lost, there will be other jobs. We do not need to stay at war to avoid economic collapse. This is as one-sided an article as I have ever seen.

Andre of SD 4:53PM August 08, 2011

From a DOD perspective and our role in budget cuts the answer has been staring us right in the face every day:

http://costofwar.com/en/

Problem solved

Tony of RI 9:40AM August 08, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos