Both Sides See Same-Sex Marriage as Winning Issue in 2012

Gay marriage could be a difference maker issue in 2012

July 27, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (49)

The economy is king in 2012 politics, but in a close election, the issue of same-sex marriage could make a difference.

With New York recently legalizing gay marriage, the Pentagon processing the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell," and Congress battling over the Defense of Marriage Act, gay rights have gotten a lot of media attention, and activists on both sides of the argument believe they have a politically potent issue.

Voters who strongly support or strongly oppose same-sex marriage will likely be more apt to get out and vote next year and inspire others to do the same, particularly since several key states are already embroiled in the debate, with battleground state Minnesota adding a gay marriage ban vote to the state's 2012 ballot, and Colorado, another swing state, close to adding a vote to repeal its marriage ban to the ballot, if advocates gather enough signatures. "Clearly the overriding issue in the next election is going to be the economy and jobs," says Brian Darling, a senior fellow for government studies at the conservative Heritage Foundation. But when votes get close, he says, "issues like traditional marriage can make a critical difference in an election and may be a deciding factor."

After the 2004 election, when voters in 11 states adopted same-sex marriage bans, the New York Times reported that socially conservative voters who came out primarily to vote against gay marriage may have tipped the scales in favor of former President George W. Bush. Since presidential elections have been consistently close in the past six cycles—popular vote in every election since 1988 has been within nine percentage points—voters on either side of the issue could tip the scales. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on gay marriage.]

Public opinion and the political landscape have changed on gay marriage since 2004, and both continue to shift. President Obama has not supported gay marriage publicly, and has said his views on the issue are "evolving," though gay marriage advocates and opponents both assume he supports it privately, particularly based on his support for repealing Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as being between a man and a woman and permits states to not recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. And a recent Gallup poll suggests, for the first time, a majority of Americans, or 53 percent, support legalizing it, compared to 27 percent when the Defense of Marriage Act passed in 1996. Younger Americans are leading this change: 70 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds think gay marriage should be legal, compared to 54 percent of the same age group in 2010, according to the poll.

Gay marriage advocates believe this means the issue has reached a tipping point and that Republican candidates who are outspoken against gay marriage will face trouble in the general election. "In the past, Democrats supported gay rights but weren't that excited about talking about it," says Richard Socarides, former Clinton adviser and president of Equality Matters, which works for equal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. "And Republicans used gay rights issues as a way to energize right-wing base voters." 2012, he says, will be different, "because the Democrats will be using their support for gay rights as an issue to excite their own base, as an issue to generate enthusiasm around Democratic swing voters." [Vote now: Should the Defense of Marriage Act be repealed?]

Tags:
Rick Santorum,
Democratic Party,
LGBT rights,
Tim Pawlenty,
Rick Perry,
George W. Bush,
2012 presidential election,
Republican Party,
Michele Bachmann,
Newt Gingrich,
Barack Obama,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (49)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Gay Marriage should be allowed! Everybody deserves love! God created each and every human to be completely different. If God didn't want Gay's or Lesbians or Bi's he wouldn't have created them. Also why is it everyone's business on who loves who? It's there own personal life, you have no right sticking your nose into it. I'm not saying allow them to get married in churches either because that is disrespect to the church and their religion but, allow them to get married under state constitution. Respect people, that's all this country needs...

Brittany Paradis of ME 2:11PM March 16, 2013

Nov 2012 pres election is a cinch for obama, right? Actually it is yes and no. It is all about perception and semantics. A few executive blunders follow below.

Obama supported building a muslim mosque near 9/11 site, repealed DADT in the military, has been instrumental in destroying the American Christian Church, nominated a homosexual to the supreme court, and supports homosexual unions. Obama and democrats have done squat for the economy.

Vice President Dan Quayle's moment of embarrassment happened as William Figueroa, 12, was the boy who knew how to spell "potato" even though Quayle insisted on adding an "e" to the end.

Richard Nixon's involvement in the Watergate cover-up and his statement, "I am not a crook."

The public loved movie star Ron so they voted him president. Ronald Reagan and the Iran-Contra Affair, the effort to sell arms to Iran and use the money to finance an armed anti-communist group in Nicaragua.

And lets not forget Bill Clinton's Monica Lewinsky sex scandal...most Americans commented that as long as he did his job as pres his sex life was not important.

There are many others, but hey the public does not care. If they like you, they'll vote for you even if you are campaigning in the nude. Most Americans are not interested in inherent critical issues, as long as they like you and have enough money to buy beer, watch a ball game on TV, and do what they want.....they'll vote for you. Californians liked movie star Arnold Schwarzenegger so they made him Governor of California. They did not care that he was born in Thal, Austria and spoke in broken English. They didn't care that he served in the Austrian Army...not the U.S. Army. They didn't care that he earned his BA by correspondence. And they did not care about his pappy: Gustav Schwarzenegger, (Arnold's father) Military service: Served in WWII with the German Nazi Army. He served with the Sturmabteilung (storm troopers) which functioned as a paramilitary organization of the Nazi Party which played a role in Adolf Hitler's rise to power in the 1920's and 1930's.

With obama's repeal of DADT in the military, and obama's nomination of a homosexual lesbian to the supreme court, full blown homosexuals have come out of the closet. When will the bisexuals, cross-dressers/gender dysphoric trasvestite fetishist, exhibitionist, fetishist, frotteurist, sexual masochist, sexual sadist, voyeurist, individuals with gender identity disorder, and animalism deviates also come out of the closet?

Flash Dec 8 news...Legality of Bestiality Becomes Surprise Military Controversy. WASHINGTON -- Just in case you weren't sure, bestiality is still illegal in the U.S. military. And, yes, that issue was actually in question this week. For the past few days, White House and Pentagon officials have fielded uncomfortable queries on whether they are working to decriminalize sex with animals as part of efforts to update the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Military officials have now asked Congress to drop the anti-sodomy language from the UCMJ. Section 125 actually states that any servicemember who "engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same sex or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy." Offenders face court-martial for any violations.

Male to male sex equals homosexual. A married bisexual is still a homosexual. Adult to child sex equals pedophile.

It is wrong to attempt to normalize the very dangerous mental disorder of homosexuality. President Obama is pushing for same sex marriage to be the supreme court's law of the land. While homosexuality was (politically and not scientifically) deleted from the DSM there is a current attempt by government and the media to normalize homosexuality. If you view the 1st John Jay college report on abusing homosexual Catholic priests it clearly states that over 80% of the child sexual molestation was of a homosexual nature. Just recently John Jay college attempted to say that their first report was in error and is now trying to say that the cause of priests sexually molesting boys was not because the priests were homosexual, but rather because that was just the behavior of the turbalent 1960's. Pedohile is pedophile and when this scandal first was made public, in a televised interview Pope John Paul II said that they knew the problem they had with homosexual priests.

Friday, April 16, 2010 8:18 AM: Pope Benedict's lieutenant, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, touched of a firestorm of international criticism from the deviancy cabal this week when he stated that "there is a relationship between homosexuality and pedophilia." The Church itself reports that "two-thirds of the incidents of abuse of adolescents by priests involve homosexual priests."

As Tony Perkins of FRC said in his update yesterday, "While activists like to claim that pedophilia is a completely distinct orientation from homosexuality, evidence shows a disproportionate overlap between the two. About a third of all child sex abuse cases involve men molesting boys--and in one study, 86% of such men identified themselves as homosexual or bisexual.

QUESTION: Why is a polygraph test admissible in court but not a plethysmograph test?

QUESTION: If moral turpitude (law) is any base or vile conduct, contrary to accepted morals that accompanies a crime....I ask do 9 Supreme Court individuals (one Chief Justice and 8 Associate Justices) decide what are accepted morals......or do 300+ million Americans decide what are accepted morals? I ask what is the difference between male homosexuals (and bisexuals) in America, in the military, and the Catholic Priests described above? Is the answer that male homosexuals (and bisexuals) in the military are not pedophiles and do not sexually abuse little boys.....and only Catholic male homosexuals (and bisexual) priests are pedophiles who sexually abuse little boys?

QUESTION: When police apprehends a male pedophile is a psychological test administered to determine if the male is heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual? And if so, are those records open for public perusal?

manoflamancha of TX 11:47AM January 17, 2012

I LOVE MEN

shamu of MN 10:42AM December 21, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos