Debt Ceiling Debate to Weigh Heavily on 2012 Races

To many voters, the "how" of a debt ceiling agreement matters as much as the "what"

July 26, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

Many politicians inevitably invoke the nation's future economic health when staking out positions in the debt ceiling debate, but many doubtless have their own political futures in mind. But with public disgust with Washington rampant, many voters could end up judging politicians not only by what is ultimately decided but also how it is decided.

"I do think this is a potentially huge factor in next year's elections," says Stuart Rothenberg, editor and publisher of the Rothenberg Political Report, a nonpartisan newsletter that covers election campaigns. In his opinion, voters will take into account both substance and style when evaluating their elected officials. "If the president appears to put Social Security and Medicare on the table, that will drive his liberal base bananas. If the Republicans appear at the end of the day to accept a deal that includes additional taxes, ...I think the Tea Party people will go ballistic," he says, but adds that stubbornness or apathy could also make for unhappy voters. "If at the end of the day, the Republicans are defined as the party that is extreme, intransigent, uncooperative, uncompromising, then Republicans will suffer. If at the end of the day, Democrats look as if they don't really care that much about spending ... then Democrats are going to be hurt." says Rothenberg.

[See how the GOP has made gains among independents in advance of 2012.]

Indeed, polls suggest that Americans from across the political spectrum want compromise, albeit in measures that vary widely by party identification. A poll released today by the Pew Research Center shows that 68 percent of respondents want lawmakers who share their views to compromise, even if it means striking a deal with which they disagree. The results are heavily split along party lines, but majorities of all parties favor compromise, including 81 percent of Democrats, 69 percent of independents, and 53 percent of Republicans.

The potential impact of the fight on voter perceptions has not escaped the notice of Washington's political machinery. Today, Crossroads GPS, a conservative third-party expenditure group cofounded by former George W. Bush adviser Karl Rove, announced a $560,000 ad buy targeting five Democratic senators on spending. The group has pledge to spend a total of $20 million this summer. Likewise, liberal PAC Moveon.org has produced a series of ads that accuse Republican House members of holding the debt ceiling hostage for political gain.

According to Robert Gleason, Jr., chairman of the Republican State Committee of Pennsylvania, some voters perceive Democratic incumbents as ignoring their opinions. In Gleason's opinion, by following the president's lead and not listening adequately to their constituents, those officials pay the price in public opinion. "We know who Obama is, and we know who our senators are, we know who [Pennsylvania Democratic Sen.] Bob Casey [is], who has to run next year. And he has supported the president 90 percent of the time, and I think everybody knows that both of their numbers are miserable. And for two men who are running for reelection, they have to be very worried about Pennsylvania," says Gleason. Earlier this month, a Public Policy Polling poll showed the president's approval rating in the Keystone State to be at 46 percent. This stands in contrast to the 2008 presidential election, when Obama won the state by a 10 percent margin.

[See how different U.S. cities have dealt with their budget woes.]

Meanwhile, Jim Burn, chairman of Pennsylvania's Democratic State Committee, believes that voters will look not to how politicians interact with the electorate but rather with each other. "What we see from the Democratic leadership in Pennsylvania is willingness to work in a bipartisan fashion," says Burn, adding that he believes that those Democrats will be rewarded for doing "what's in everybody's best interest, not the best interest of a select few." Likewise, Sue Dvorsky, chairman of the Iowa Democratic Party, says that voters care just as much about the negotiation process as the outcome, and are capable of mentally separating the two issues. "I think those are two different things. I am confident we will get an increase in the debt ceiling. I am confident in that. How this plays out, the kind of rhetoric people are using ... I do think that people are listening to that." She cites Iowa Republican Representatives Steve King and Tom Latham as examples of Republican "intransigence" on the debt ceiling issue. King said via Twitter this week that the president could be impeached if the nation defaults.

Tags:
Bob Casey,
Steve King,
2012 presidential election,
deficit and national debt

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Obama better lose the next election or im moving to canada

katy of OH 8:14AM November 15, 2011

I consider myself an independent voter, and cannot claim--in ordinary times-- a preference for either party, but I am astounded at the comments that indicate the Tea Party and selected Republican Party candidates are on their way to win in 2012. There may be candidates in the Republican Party who do not agree with the Supreme Court decision on corporate citizenship, and with ALEC, and with the FCC's removal of accuracy in media, but I do hope that those Republicans, who do not agree, will say so, aiding us in identifying honest, Republican candidates.

How do we expect democracy to continue in the United States without truth in media? Because we abandoned truth in our newscasts, we are NOT getting truthful political news. This loss of accuracy in media was largely initiated in Reagan's Presidential Term, and overwhelmingly backed by the Republican Party. What about those of us who want to know the facts about a candidate or just who that corrupted, government official might be? How do we choose the best candidate if we NEVER learn the truth about his/her character, intelligence, and leadership qualities?

On January 21, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations ARE citizens of the United States, and can donate unlimited funds to the candidates of the corporation's choice. Will these candidates represent human beings or just corporate citizens? The answer is obvious. We ordinary human citizens haven't a chance of influencing any principled candidate's success in the United States of America. The ethical candidate that you may WANT elected will lose to the candidate who was elected by a corporation, who easily pay for the "best that money can buy." Where is the candidate who represents YOU in an election?

Speaking of corporations, take a long and hard look at the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), and tell me reasons why I should quite worrying about our country? ALEC is composed of members of State and Federal Congresses, and hundreds of corporations, including CEOs and Lobbyists, ex-Governors and present Governors. ALEC does not introduce legislation at the national level--oh, no--too obvious to the public and the news cameras! Alec quietly introduces "model"legislation at the STATE LEVEL, gets about a third of the "models" passed in the House and Senate, and bypassing ANY input from you and me, and from all voters who are HUMAN citizens.

What is the harm in that? The harm in that a group of government "representatives, past and present, and other American citizens, of non-human origin, have denied you your Constitutional right to vote in the United States of America! These "alleged" American "representatives" and corporate "citizens" denied your Constitutional right to a role in the democratic process, at the national, AND at the state level.

ann keenan of MI 3:23AM August 06, 2011

I just paid $23,98 for an iPad2-64GB and my girlfriend loves her Panasonic Lumix GF 1 Camera that we got for $37,59 there arriving tomorrow by UPS. I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LED TV to my boss for $677 which only cost me $72,13 to buy. Here is the website we use to get it all from, --> FineCent. com<--

Byron Carpenter of FL 11:54AM August 02, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos