Is Plan B Now Plan A in the Debt Talks?

The pieces are moving in place for a debt ceiling deal, but it still may be a long shot

July 15, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (9)

By most accounts, the debt ceiling talks have reached a kind of dead end. While not over, the two sides have realized that there just isn't any more common ground to haggle over. With just two weeks left until the Treasury Department's deadline to raise the federal debt limit, the pieces are beginning to come together for a steroid version of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's plan to raise the debt ceiling in increments over the next year and a half. But the plan still has a tough road ahead, with conservatives crying foul over concessions to President Obama.

[Political Cartoons on the Budget and Deficit]

The latest version of the plan is a hybrid of McConnell's original idea and what both sides have loosely agreed to in the White House debt talks. Democratic sources say that McConnell and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are working on a proposal that would immediately enact the $1.5 trillion in spending cuts which White House and GOP negotiations have generally agreed on, and which then would space out debt ceiling hikes through the rest of 2011 and 2012. Those spending cuts would cover only federal discretionary spending, leaving entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security untouched. Lawmakers are also considering adding a provision which would set up a Senate committee to recommend further spending cuts, and bring them to a vote on the Senate floor. President Obama didn't mention it specifically in his press conference Friday, but did note that he'd support a plan less ambitious than the grand bargain he had been pushing.

In the meantime, both the House and Senate will soon vote on the so-called "Cut, Cap, and Balance" plan promoted by the Republican Study Committee, a conservative House group. That proposal would enact much deeper spending cuts, and only trigger a debt ceiling hike once the Senate and House had passed a balanced budget amendment and sent it to the states for ratification. It's unlikely to pass, but is seen as a necessary catharsis for conservative lawmakers who may have to hold their noses and vote for a smaller deal.

But not all will. Conservative opposition to the idea continues to grow. South Carolina Republican Sen. Jim DeMint, a regular thorn in the GOP leadership's side, promised to use "every tool in the Senate" to stop McConnell's plan. "No Republican was elected to give President Obama more power and that's what this plan does," DeMint wrote on his Twitter account. It's not an idle threat. Even one senator could block the bill for days, making it difficult to pass under a tight deadline.

At this point, Hill staffers are still looking at the plan as a possible backup, although with limited time left lawmakers will soon have to move on it. The Democratic source noted that, even if it never sees the light of day, the McConnell plan helps the White House's position by providing another backup option rather than the short-term debt ceiling hike which conservatives have been pushing.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Jim DeMint,
Mitch McConnell,
Congress,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
Harry Reid

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The constitution gave the power of the purse to the house of representatives. I, for one, will support throwing them all out on their ear of they vote for more borrowing. I, for one, say hold the very workings of government hostage until we get conservative social policies re instated. i.e. Obamacare rolled back. Planned parenthood defunded and prosecuted, The administration respect its promise to support traditional marriage as the definition of marriage as Biden promised Obama would in debate with Sarah Pallin, roll back all restrictions on business activity until we have jobs again, are secure in our houses and have money to spend.. whales, trees, rivers and national parks should be sacrificed to this cause: drill all the oil and refine more than we produce!

fndfreedom of CA 12:48PM July 21, 2011

It seems to me that if the U. S. would stop sending our tax dollars to other countrys for five years and keep it here, would it help pay some on our debts , i think so. Then it might be that the goverment would not need to take money from s. s and other needed progams that the older amercians have paid into out of their pay checks all their life.It all so seems that if it was not republians against the democrats, but for both partys to work for the people and the country that congress would be more effective after all isnt that why we elected them in the first place

john reeves of MO 1:53PM July 19, 2011

YOU COULD ADD TAXES TO THE RICH 2% AND ALSO GIVE TAXES BACK IF THEY ADD EMPLOYEES.

ANOTHER THING, WOULD BE TO SELL RESOURCES SUCH AS TIMBER AND NATURAL GAS AND EVEN FISH FROM ALASKA.

ANOTHER WAY TO REDUCE THE BUDGET IS TO HAVE FOREIGN COUNTRIES THAT WE

HAVE MILITARY AIDING IN A FIGHT OR PROTECTION, TO PAY US...EXAMPLE...IRAQ,

KOREA, AFGHANSTAN, ETC.

CUT OUT ALL FOREIGN AIDE, AS WELL AS AIDE TO ALL NON-AMERICANS...MEDICAL,

EDCATIONAL, HOUSING, FOOD, ETC.

PUT ALL NON ESSENTIAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES ON A FOUR DAY WORK WEEK.

PROVIDE FOR BIRTH CONTROL CONTRACEPTIVES AND NOT FOR ABORTIONS IN PLANNED PARENTHOOD.

LET ALL SCHOOL ATHLETIC PROGRAMS BE PRIVATELY OR CITY FUNDED...NOT GOVERNMENT FUNDED. LET THE GOVERNMENT BE IN THE BUSINESS OF EDUCATION, INCLUDING HEALTH, AND PHYSICAL FITNESS.

PUT FOREST FIRE TOWERS BACK IN OUR PARKS AND CUT PERSONNEL.

CUT UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS TO 6 MONTHS

j.t. of TX 10:00PM July 17, 2011

Photo Galleries

Women on Death Row

Only 12 women have been executed on death row in the U.S. since 1976.

advertisement

Latest Videos