White House Debt Ceiling Summit Aims for Grand Deficit Bargain

Obama puts Social Security on the table but gulf between two sides seems starker than ever

July 7, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (7)

As Congressional leaders confer with President Obama at the White House today on the debt negotiations, they've shown their cards a bit, and there's finally some clarity to go along with the red-hot rhetoric. Obama is reportedly still thinking big, pushing a debt ceiling compromise which would cut entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security in exchange for raising more taxes by eliminating corporate tax preferences, other deductions, or allowing the Bush-era tax cuts to expire. Republicans, meanwhile, indicated some flexibility on eliminating distasteful corporate tax subsidies—but also publicly clarified their position that such tinkering with the tax code shouldn't raise any new taxes. There's talk of a grand bargain in the air, but the gulf between the two parties has never been more clear.

[Read how the debt ceiling issue reveals chamber-GOP rift.]

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor blasted Obama Wednesday for attributing the breakdown of negotiations to tax breaks for things like corporate jets. "We've said all along that preferences in the code aren't something that helps economic growth overall," Cantor said. "But, listen, we are not for any proposal that increases taxes, and any type of discussion should be coupled with offsetting tax cuts somewhere else." Although ostensibly indicating a willingness to deal on tax breaks, Cantor's comments—echoed by other GOP lawmakers throughout the day--made it even more clear that Republicans won't allow any federal revenue enhancements through overhauling the tax code. Both sides may well back down and compromise before letting the nation go into default, but it will take a lot of face-saving spin.

According to Cantor, the bipartisan talks with Vice President Joe Biden produced a plan with the "potential" to cut $2 trillion off the deficit over 10 years. the discretionary spending cuts agreed to could become the basis for a shorter term deal which would entail the debt ceiling issue being revisited again next year, though neither side likes the idea. In fact Cantor joked with reporters Wednesday that the only thing he and the president agree on is that a short term deal would be a nonstarter.

For his part, Obama is looking to deal with the issue for good, with a $4 trillion deal which would both raise taxes and slash entitlement programs. It's an ambitious goal, but even if the deal is finalized with party leaders, it will likely be met with strong opposition from rank-and-file Democrats looking to guard social programs, and Republicans opposed to any type of tax increase.

[Read about President Obama's role as the "adult" in the debt ceiling negotiations.]

No one on Capitol Hill wants to relive this fight again next year. There will be fewer options left to cut a deal, and the election season will make compromise harder. There's plenty left to fight over this year--sometime this fall, lawmakers will have yet another showdown over the federal budget, with yet another threatened government shutdown on the horizon.

Whereas this showdown has, so far, avoided rattling the market or panicking Americans, an election-year showdown adds an element of uncertainty to the equation.

It's an option that everyone would like to avoid, but it may be the only way out.

Tags:
Eric Cantor,
Congress,
deficit and national debt

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Historically the rich paid more taxes and have gotten more and more tax cuts and reductions..Now the rich(republicans want to cut ssi) if they are not allowed to raise how much debt they can put us in ????? and they want to continue to cut their taxes. I say its time to get guns and help collect those taxes..shoot a rich dude today and the government will have more than enough taxes to collect on inheritance taxes.

joe blow of NY 12:11AM July 15, 2011

I FEEL THAT THE COUNTRY HAS CHANGED THE THE CLASS OF PEOPLE UNTIL IT IS NOW THE RICH AND THE POOR, NOLONGER A MIDDLE CLASS. THE BUSH TAX HAS BEEN A BURDEN TO THIS COUNTRY TOO LONG. WE THE PEOPLE VOTED THE PEOPLE IN AND NOW IF THEY FAIL TO KEEP THIS COUNTRY IN GOOD STANDING, WE MUST VOTE THE PEOPLE OUT AND START OVER, SOME FEEL THAT THIS IS THEIR LIFES CALLING, NOT SO IF FORMER PRES. NIXION WAS HERE HE COULD TELL YOU BETTER. WHY WOULD SOCIAL SECURITY BE AT THE TOP OF THE LIST TO CUT? THE RICH IS ONLY GETTING RICHER, LET THE LITTLE MAN HAVE SOME OF THE DREAM WE TALK ABOUT. THE DEBT CEILING HAS BEEN INCREASED MANY TIMES BEFORE, WHAT IS THE PROBLEM NOW? JUST LOOK BACK THREE YEARS AND SEE WHERE WE WERE THEN WITH THE ECONOMY. FORMER PRES. CLINTON BROUGHT THE BUDGET UP AND IN 8YRS. IF WAS GONE.

Maybelline Harris of IL 7:25PM July 12, 2011

earl hickey of IL

you're wrong, there would be no deficit if we eliminated the Bush tax cuts for Rich

there are real simple solutions - return to tax rates of Bill Clinton or even Ronald Reagan and we would be able to balance the budget immediately. sorry earl, you must be listing to too much Fox if you so pessimistic you can't see beyond this Republican depression and the current Republican effort to sabotage the economy

If we get out of some of these arbitrary optional wars, we would be able to restart nation building here, lord knows we need it, instead for some Mid East desert tribes.

We need to get past these obstructionists who don't want to invest in the US

Sally of 7:50PM July 10, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos