Divorce Rates Lower in States with Same-Sex Marriage

Reader Comments

Back to article

Why does anyone care if gay marriage is legalixed or not? I think it should but those who are against it say its a sin. So what? It's not like it effects yoou or the things in your life. So why bother protesting it.

Lexi-Danielle of OH 1:07PM April 19, 2013

Of course, you equate gay marriage with sex. Part of the reason that there is more promiscuity in the gay community is that there is no associated consequence of pregnancy as a deterrent to unsafe sex with multiple partners. Obviously, though, there are significant risks for infection. Yes, there are risk factors involved with sexual intercourse. Let's just look at the skyrocketing rates of STD transmission among heterosexuals and the disturbing connection in young heterosexual women developing HPV and cervical cancer. One of the ways we can combat promiscuity is by encouraging stable relationships and safe sexual practices, something that the stigmatized gay community has only recently gotten serious about because people who cite statistics about the HIV rate in the US among gays use it as a way to shove them back into the dark corners of society. Encouraging lasting relationships in the gay community will ultimately lower the rate of STD and HIV transmission, much as curbing the trend towards sexual promiscuity among young people in the heterosexual community will help curb instances of HPV among young women. Also, just an FYI, the demographics of the number of gay people in this country is difficult to calculate, in part because they continue to be marginalized. However, estimates of between 4 and 6% of the population seem to be pretty sound.

Jonathon Struve of IA 1:07PM May 09, 2012

I am a straight woman, married for over 30 years to the same man. We have many gay friends who have been with their partners/spouses for years and years. I did not choose to be attracted by men. My best friend, a lesbian, did not choose to be attracted to women.

My friends are wonderful people. To straight people everywhere, this is how some of us are wired. To say horrible things about our own children, family and friends is, at best, ignorant, at worst, it is hate.

My friends hurt no one. Some people are gay. I assure you that they are real people. Do you know anyone who is gay? How can you criticize people that you do not even know?

Jude of WI 7:59PM July 30, 2011

Andreas of NY thinks that homosexuality is "natural" and "right"!

See Reason 10 of 17 in the online article ""Is Cuomo Ignoring the Evidence Against Gay Marriage?" ( http://www.scribd.com/doc/54881192/Is-Cuomo-Ignoring-the-Evidence-Against-Gay-Marriage-Updated ).

Andreas' position is perplexing given the hard medical evidence:

"...The Surgeon General has said, "Condoms provide some protection, but anal intercourse is simply too dangerous a practice...." ("Condoms and sexually transmitted diseases, especially AIDS": Article 7, FDA document 90-4239).

"... David Ostrow et al have gone to great lengths to explain why the Surgeon General has adopted this position, and it bears repeating at this stage:...

"... The physiology of the rectum makes it clear that sodomy is unnatural. The inward expansion of the rectum during anal intercourse frequently tears the rectal lining, resulting in spasms, colitis, cramps, and a variety of other physical responses. Furthermore, sperm can readily penetrate the rectal wall (the vagina cannot be so readily penetrated) and do massive immunological damage, leaving the body vulnerable to a bewildering variety of opportunistic infections...." (David Ostrow et al, eds., “Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Homosexual Men”, New York, Plenum Medical Book Co., 1982 … in the article “Hemorrhoids, Anal Fissure and Condylomata Acuminata”; G. Manligit et al., “Chronic Immune Stimulation by Sperm Alloantigens,” in the Journal of the American Medical Association 251, 1984 … 237-241; See also J. Richards et al.,

“Rectal Insemination Modifies Immune Responses in Rabbits,” Science 224 … 1984 … 390-392; G. Shearer and A. Rabson, “Semen and Aids,” Nature

308 … 1984:230). (These and other citations in Roger Magnuson's "Are Gay Rights Right? Making Sense of the Controversy"; Multhnomah Press:)..."

Or perhaps this might help:

The Centers for Disease control FastFacts on HIV/AIDS in gay and bisexual men (MSM) IN SEPTEMBER 2010 (http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/FastFacts-MSM-FINAL508COMP.pdf ):

REMEMBER, THIS IS FOR 4% OF THE USA'S POPULATION ...

1. MSM account for nearly half of the more than one million people living with HIV in the U.S. (48%, or an estimated 532,000 total persons).

2. MSM account for more than half of all new HIV infections in the U.S. each year (53%, or an estimated 28,700 infections).

3. While CDC estimates that MSM account for just 4 percent of the U.S. male population aged 13 and older, the rate of new HIV diagnoses among MSM in the U.S. is more than 44 times that of other men (range: 522–989 per 100,000

MSM vs. 12 per 100,000 other men).

4. MSM are the only risk group in the U.S. in which new HIV infections are increasing. While new infections have declined among both heterosexuals and injection drug users, the annual number of new HIV infections among MSM

has been steadily increasing since the early 1990s.

So, Andreas, EXACTLY how "normal" and "natural" is homosexuality again?

Roger of NJ 3:43PM July 08, 2011

See Reason 10 of 17 in the online article ""Is Cuomo Ignoring the Evidence Against Gay Marriage?" ( http://www.scribd.com/doc/54881192/Is-Cuomo-Ignoring-the-Evidence-Against-Gay-Marriage-Updated ).

NOW HEAR THIS: Andreas of NY thinks that homosexuality is "natural" and "right"!

Andreas' position is perplexing given the hard medical evidence:

"...The Surgeon General has said, "Condoms provide some protection, but anal intercourse is simply too dangerous a practice...." ("Condoms and sexually transmitted diseases, especially AIDS": Article 7, FDA document 90-4239).

"... David Ostrow et al have gone to great lengths to explain why the Surgeon General has adopted this position, and it bears repeating at this stage:...

"... The physiology of the rectum makes it clear that sodomy is unnatural. The inward expansion of the rectum during anal intercourse frequently tears the rectal lining, resulting in spasms, colitis, cramps, and a variety of other physical responses. Furthermore, sperm can readily penetrate the rectal wall (the vagina cannot be so readily penetrated) and do massive immunological damage, leaving the body vulnerable to a bewildering variety of opportunistic infections...." (David Ostrow et al, eds., “Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Homosexual Men”, New York, Plenum Medical Book Co., 1982 … in the article “Hemorrhoids, Anal Fissure and Condylomata Acuminata”; G. Manligit et al., “Chronic Immune Stimulation by Sperm Alloantigens,” in the Journal of the American Medical Association 251, 1984 … 237-241; See also J. Richards et al.,

“Rectal Insemination Modifies Immune Responses in Rabbits,” Science 224 … 1984 … 390-392; G. Shearer and A. Rabson, “Semen and Aids,” Nature

308 … 1984:230). (These and other citations in Roger Magnuson's "Are Gay Rights Right? Making Sense of the Controversy"; Multhnomah Press:)..."

Or perhaps this might help:

The Centers for Disease control FastFacts on HIV/AIDS in gay and bisexual men (MSM) IN SEPTEMBER 2010 (http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/FastFacts-MSM-FINAL508COMP.pdf ):

REMEMBER, THIS IS FOR 4% OF THE USA'S POPULATION ...

1. MSM account for nearly half of the more than one million people living with HIV in the U.S. (48%, or an estimated 532,000 total persons).

2. MSM account for more than half of all new HIV infections in the U.S. each year (53%, or an estimated 28,700 infections).

3. While CDC estimates that MSM account for just 4 percent of the U.S. male population aged 13 and older, the rate of new HIV diagnoses among MSM in the U.S. is more than 44 times that of other men (range: 522–989 per 100,000

MSM vs. 12 per 100,000 other men).

4. MSM are the only risk group in the U.S. in which new HIV infections are increasing. While new infections have declined among both heterosexuals and injection drug users, the annual number of new HIV infections among MSM

has been steadily increasing since the early 1990s.

So, Andreas, EXACTLY how "normal" and "natural" is homosexuality again?

Roger of NJ 3:39PM July 08, 2011

These folks are being nice: What they are saying with their big words is that the more educated you are, the less likely you are to believe what we've all been taught--the lie that homosexuality is somehow unnatural and therefore wrong.

Anyone who thinks FRC's data isn't skewed probably still thinks the world is flat.

Roger of NH obviously watches Fox News for his fair and balanced view of the world.

Here is a different world view:

Homosexuality exists, with statistical regularity, in free cultures, and underground in almost every other "closed" culture.

Homosexuality, along with bisexuality, occurs in more than 450 non-human species.

All traits are selected, therefore all human traits are selected.

Mutations occur with statistical regularity--more so during periods of increased radiation. Mutations favorable to the survival of the individual are selected, thus allowing the species to evolve. Negative mutations die out.

Homosexuality is well documented throughout human history. If it were negative, it would have died out long ago.

Further,

Social engineering to effect population control (decrease growth) was practiced in Ancient Greece, c. 600 BCE. Homosexuality was encouraged to limit (male) offspring in order to help prevent endless subdivision of inherited real property. This was well accepted by the society and considered normal behavior.

Social engineering to effect population control (increase growth) has been practiced by Judeo-Christo-Islamic cultures for thousands of years in order to achieve national security: there is safety in numbers, and the more there are of US, the better WE can protect ourselves against THEM. Only 1 in every 100 is suitable for warfare, so an army of 100,000 requires a population of 10,000,000.

Approbation against non-procreative behaviors and relationships is used by social engineers to achieve the above results. Homosexuality was thought to lessen the chance of success in the long term by slowing the baby-making industrial complex.

A moral aspect was attached to this approbation as an ancient Judaic technique that ensured compliance: Since the Almighty says so, if you don't comply, you will go to Hell.

Species that do not live in balance with their environment go extinct. We are destroying our world in order to protect ourselves from our neighbors, our enemies.

If we do not lift the moral approbation against non-procreative behavior and relationships, we will continue down the current path of destruction. Our bisexual nature is key to human success in the geological long term. Without it, along with failing to redeem the other cerebral practices, we are doomed, and we are killing countless other species along with ourselves.

Finally, THE TREND TO ACCEPT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE is a final attempt by our species to survive in the long term. We should listen to our inner voices that tell us, "It's okay to be gay, because God made us this way. Don't listen to what the others say. One day, one day!!"

Andreas of NY 9:14PM July 07, 2011

Gay-advocacy DEPENDS for its survival on the constant and incessant selling of ... anecdotal fiction!

But what do the POLICE facts say?

Read the "Hiding Dirty Laundry" section of the 60-page 2002 law review by Dr. Judith Reisman "Crafting Bi/Homosexual Youth" ( http://www.regent.edu/news/lawreview/articles/14_2Reisman.doc ).

A truly astonishing picture of the "reality' of the "gay" lifestyle emerges!

Gay-advocacy ... and thereby "gay-marriage" ... is built on a lie, a hoax of stupendous proportions!

Dr. reisman's 'police" findings are cited at Reason 7 of 17 in the online article "Is Cuomo Ignoring the Evidence Against Gay Marriage?" ( http://www.scribd.com/doc/54881192/Is-Cuomo-Ignoring-the-Evidence-Against-Gay-Marriage-Updated ) which illustrates 27 INITIAL reasons ... 17 explicitly stated ... why New Yorkers will still reject "gay marriage" in 2011 and onwards!

WHAT ARE THE CURRENT FACTS?

Roger of NH 6:15PM July 07, 2011

Dr. Paul McHugh, Distinguished Service Professor in Psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Hospital, addresses the collossal psycho-sexual torment manifest in "transgenders" and "homosexuals" in his online article "Surgical Sex" (http://www.policystudies.ca/documents/Surgical_Sex_Change.pdf )

He is forced to come to one incredible conclusion (why wasn't it obvious to everyone before?)

"... ..We have wasted scientific and technical resources and damaged our professional credibility by collaborating with madness rather thantrying to study, cure, and ultimately prevent it…. "

Perhaps it wasn't obvious to everyone before because ... gay advocacy is built on a hoax of stupendous proportions!

Roger of NH 6:02PM July 07, 2011

Didn't ANYONE bother to read Justice Antonin Scalia's read/written dissent in Lawrence vs. Texas?

The LEAST Americans can expect of their legislators and elected officials ... and its reporters ... is to become acquainted with the details off an issue!

Scalia winced as his liberal colleagues manufactured "law" out of thin air, and warned America of the perilous path its liberal judges had undertaken ...

"...This effectively decrees the end of all morals legislation. If, as the Court asserts, the promotion of majoritarian sexual morality is not even a legitimate state interest, none of the above-mentioned laws can survive rational-basis review...”

Has ANYONE bothered to assess the slew of laws that "gay rights" will usurp?

Does gay-advocacy ... and thereby "gay-marriage" ... mean the end of the rational law? ... the end of reason?

The online article "Is Cuomo Ignoring the Evidence Against Gay Marriage?" ( http://www.scribd.com/doc/54881192/Is-Cuomo-Ignoring-the-Evidence-Against-Gay-Marriage-Updated ) illustrates 27 INITIAL reasons ... 17 explicitly stated ... why New Yorkers will still reject "gay marriage" in 2011 and onwards! As will Pennsylvania! As will New Jersey!

It is evidence-based!

Roger of NH 5:47PM July 07, 2011

As a mid-20's gay male that's been with my boyfriend for 7 years, never cheated, or been cheated on, has a masters degree, and choosing to live my life by serving as a positive role model... How exactly am I a bad person, or "pushing my agenda" on you? What plague am I spreading by being in a monogamous relationship just because I happen to live with another man? If you are going to judge a whole group of people by what some tend to do, then by all means turn your eyes towards any television. It would have you believe that all girls are "16 and pregnant," or that it is okay to be a vapid heiress and you should aspire to be as such. How about we take a look over at Jersey where we teach young girls it's ok to drink, and fight, and get laid after partying every night. How about where we glamourize fake "grillz" and "poppin bottles" or "makin it rain fo' the bitches" while we pretend to be "street" or "thug." Then again we could look at the countless affairs, lying, homosexuals trysts, and scandals that seem to be so prevalent in those who voice the loudest opposition to "our agenda" within the "moral right" or "family values centric" crowd. However, since they "went to rehab" or "repented" or "issued an apology" they are forever lost to oblivion. Since they are never reported on or heard from again, they are thereby considered to be null and void, and things continue like they never existed. Darn our countries short attention span and the news medias ability to distract with the next flash in the pan.

All in all, my point is, before you go casting stones and claiming we are "perverts" or "sinners" or whatever clever name you can come up with this month to make yourself feel superior, I would advise you to clean up your own act. To quote a very clever website "If you want to protect the sanctity of marriage, ban divorce." Straight people haven't been doing a very good job of protecting this sanctity with a nationwide divorce rate of over 50%, so what really is your problem? That we exist? That we are allowed to openly express ourselves and be who we are without fear of being locked up, or fear of being labeled "mentally unfit." Or is it because you feel that our "agenda" is to take over someone, and convert everyone, or sleep with everyone, or make homosexual experimentation a required course in high school. Well, i'll tell you this. I have no agenda other than being left alone to live in peace and happiness with the man I love. If you don't like it, fine, we don't have to be friends, in face i'd rather not be your friend. You aren't going to be forced to attend my wedding, nor do I want you to show up. Live and let live, love and be loved, share joy and happiness with those around you, and show kindness to all living creatures.

Angedelune of GA 5:06PM July 07, 2011

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Back to article

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos