Robert Gates's Departure Is Hillary Clinton's Opportunity

With low-key Panetta taking over the Pentagon, the State Department could reassert its foreign affairs primacy

June 30, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

And testifying before a Senate panel last week, the day after Obama's East Room address on his Afghanistan strategy, Clinton spoke about the progress and remaining challenges for Americans, civilians and diplomats especially, in Afghanistan and Pakistan. While doing so, she underscored the importance of the civilians and diplomats in ensuring America's national security interests in these countries. "I know it may be tempting to peel off the civilian elements of our strategy that make fewer headlines. But as our commanders on the ground will tell you, that would be a serious mistake," she said.

So apart from Clinton's ability to communicate her foreign policy agenda publicly, it will ultimately be the readiness of Congress to support foreign service and assistance abroad that will dictate the outcome. "As they're talking about cutting the Defense Department, nobody's talking about growing the foreign affairs budget," Sanok says. "She's putting herself out there trying to have a greater voice on national security, but the money's really not going to follow it."

Clinton, of course, has said this will be her only term as secretary of state, so how well she reasserts her department's role in the next couple of years could determine her foreign policy legacy.

Correction 06/30/11: A previous version of this article misspelled the name Richard Weitz.

Tags:
Robert Gates,
Department of Defense,
national security terrorism and the military,
Hillary Clinton,
military,
Obama administration,
State Department

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Obama is a disaster. The population is slowing seeing past the "Bush is the source of blame for all things . . . or tax the rich and all problems are solved" to understand the reality that Obama's policies aborted the recovery we were seeing early in his term. (Deep recessions are typically followed by sharp recoveries). Instead the raising of taxes, imposition of huge regulatory burdens and incredibly unaffordable new entitlements like Obamacare, the fiscal and monetary mismanagement and the uncertainty attendant on them, the imposition of expensive carbon compliance through misuse of EPA authority and similar measures aborted the recovery. Slowly people have figured out that Obama points his finger at everyone else but he owns this. Hillary is untainted by his economic policy and is generally popular. Democrats do not want to be annihilated by another Jimmy Carter debacle. Hillary is their only chance to win in 2012.

Adam Smith of NY 6:27PM July 01, 2011

Luther of LA:

Your comment was merely a comment. You haven't the faintest idea of who does what and who has actually "delivered the goods" on foreign policy in this country. Where is your researched opinion, based on your research to: "Compare and Contrast the Effectiveness of Hillary Clinton and Condoleeza Rice, Serving as U.S. Secretary of State." Please provide the documents that show "Hillary has half the accomplishments of Condi Rice."

Until you can give your opinion, based in fact, on the comparative accomplishments of these two women, your comment is just an empty comment.

ann keenan of MI 2:49PM July 01, 2011

I predic HRC will successfully challenge Obama in 2012 and go on to win the General Election. Been saying that for over two years now. Seems so obvious. Can't understand pundit universal silence.

Paul of CA 3:39PM June 30, 2011

Photo Galleries

Storms, Wildfires Tear Across U.S.

Heavy rain, high winds and fire continue to plague regions throughout the country.

advertisement

Latest Videos