Why the Republican Medicare Strategy Just Might Work in the Long Run

A deal with Democrats could swing the momentum the other way

May 31, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (10)

After a demoralizing loss in the special congressional election in New York, Republicans are admitting that the Medicare issue is hurting them at the polls. Since House Republicans overwhelmingly voted in favor of Wisconsin Republican Rep. Paul Ryan's plan to change Medicare into a voucher-based private system, Democrats have hammered them for trying to gut Medicare, and the attacks are working. But for Republicans, there's no going back. They'll have to stand by their votes and continue to push for the plan. And that just might work to win back public sentiment on the issue. [Read: New York Special Election Medicare Fight Enters Spin Mode.]

With Republicans unanimously behind Ryan's budget plan, the GOP still has a little bit of leverage to demand some sort of Medicare cost-cutting as part of a compromise to raise the debt ceiling, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is demanding that Democrats agree to do just that. If they manage to work out a deal on the issue as negotiations continue over the summer, it would complicate the Democrats' message and give the Republicans some bipartisan cover to explain their votes. It also may be the last chance to truly deal with Medicare spending, which budget experts say will become the biggest source of long-term federal debt. But working out a deal with Democrats won't be easy, especially now that they've gotten some momentum on the Medicare issue. "Republicans are looking for some way of reducing their political exposure here, and so they would like to get some agreement on Medicare savings," says Thomas Mann, a political expert at the Brookings Institution. "But Democrats will almost certainly not agree to that, without Republicans agreeing to some tax revenue increase. So, my guess is they won't do much with it." 

Both parties are still looking at Medicare reforms as part of a deficit-reduction measure. In a briefing with reporters, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer said that Medicare reforms are still "on the table." House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi also threw out a few ideas for how to trim Medicare costs, including allowing the program to negotiate over drug prices and cutting down on medical fraud. Yet, all but five Republican senators supported Ryan's plan when pushed to a vote by Democrats eager to embarrass them, with one Republican senator objecting that it didn't go far enough. (It was defeated, 40-57.) Earlier this month, the so-called Gang of Six senators seeking a bipartisan debt compromise lost one of its Republican members over rancorous discussions on Medicare spending. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

There are plenty of ideas out there about how to cut Medicare's costs in the future. President Obama proposed beefing up some of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act, including an oversight board that rates the efficiency of Medicare procedures. The president's fiscal commission included some relatively modest Medicare savings, including freezing and slowly cutting doctor reimbursement rates and changing or eliminating its long-term care insurance program. A second commission, cochaired by former Clinton Budget Director Alice Rivlin and former New Mexico Republican Sen. Pete Domenici, also created a voucher-based premium support system, but only as an optional alternative to the regular Medicare, not as a replacement. What will be difficult is finding a Medicare savings compromise which is palatable to Democrats, but also satisfies Republican promises to trim trillions of dollars off future spending. "I'm not sure how you stay in traditional Medicare and make the kind of cuts they're looking for," says Michael Tanner, a political analyst with the libertarian Cato Institute.

For Republicans, the Ryan plan has been a tough lesson in the difference between campaigning and governing—one that Democrats learned all too well after the healthcare reform law lead to electoral defeats in 2010. Ryan had announced his plan before the midterm elections, but few Republicans went near it, focusing their campaigns on the record of the Obama administration. That worked as a campaign for an out-of-power party, but now that Republicans have partial control of Congress, they have their own plans to defend. By sticking with a tough stance on Medicare reform, the GOP was likely hoping that they could keep their party unified and force greater policy concessions out of the White House. That worked with the 2011 budget negotiations, when Republicans held their caucus together by upping the ante on budget cuts after their initial proposal nearly provoked a revolt from ultra-conservative members. [Vote now: Should Paul Ryan's budget plan become law?]

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Steny Hoyer,
Paul Ryan,
Mitch McConnell,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
Nancy Pelosi,
healthcare reform,
Medicare

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

According to what I've heard, people currently on medicare or those who will be on medicare in the next ten years will not be affected by the voucher proposal. My questions are: What does that make the cutoff age, 52? 55? 57?; will the voucher replace medicare or will it supplement a reduced medicare payment?; how much will the voucher be worth if it completely replaces medicare? Based on the projected rise in insurance premiums, what percentage of the projected premiums will be covered? Until I hear some guestimates on the costs, I will reserve my comments on this plan. By the way, I am 73 years old and dont have a horse in this race but my grandchildren and great grandchildren certainly will.

Richard of VA 2:27PM July 06, 2011

I'm 34. I'm currently an independent. I can't stand the democrats and their "we're all victims philosophy". Nor can I completely condone the Republican stance of 100% laissez faire economics. Although these are broad brushes to paint with. The middle is usually closer to truth.

The truth is my grandfather's generation built a great nation. The envy of the world. My father's generation, while working hard and prospering, didn't care to pay attention to politics. And so, it is left to my generation to clean up the mess.

1) If you're over 50. Don't sweat it. Nothing will change for you. The Golden Goose will continue to lay the golden egg.

2) If we want a constitutional republic, protected rights, stable taxes and stable currency, then we, my generation is tasked with biting the bullet and cutting our own benefits, shrinking our government, accepting slightly higher taxes, and working longer.

I accept the ryan plan because anything less and we will have none of the above.

Derek of IN 12:31AM June 22, 2011

Let me get this straight...you think voters suffer from the same selective attention disease many political writers/pundits suffer from. Are we suppose to forget that Republicans passed legislation restricting voters access to vote, union busting, restricting women's rights, illegal imprisonment for immigrants, illegal drug testing for government benefits, violating same sex marriages, cutting benefits from the poor & elderly, vilified the Stimulus Plan/AffordableCare Act, opposed everything Obama does and gave more tax cuts to the wealthy all because Republicans are submissive to Wall Street/Oil Billionaires. C'mon how can you minimize the psychopathic approach Republicans have towards legislating? Oh, my bad, I'd temporarily forgot about your affliction.

Sandra Partridge of CO 4:08PM June 04, 2011

Photo Galleries

History of U.S. Bombings, Failed Attempts

A look at some of the worst bombings in the U.S. and infamous failed attempts.

advertisement

Latest Videos